The Effect of Value-Focused Discussions on Scientists' Ethical Decision Making

Tyler Garcia,Bill Bridges,Caitlin Solis,Caleb Linville,Wyatt Jones,Scott Tanona,Jonathan Herington,James T. Laverty

2024-01-12

Abstract:Many scientists view science as value-free, despite the fact that both epistemic and non-epistemic values structure scientific inquiry. Current ethics training usually focuses on transmitting knowledge about high-level ethical concepts or rules and is widely regarded as ineffective. We argue that ethics training will be more effective at improving ethical decision making if it focuses on connecting values to science. We pull from philosophy and psychology to define ethical decision making using the Four Component Model. This model states that in order to make an ethical decision someone must consider four components: moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral implementation. We formed a moderated fellowship of fourteen science faculty from different disciplines who met for ten sessions over the course of a year, where they discussed the values embedded in different scientific norms. We then conducted interviews before and after the year-long fellowship that involved guided reflection of scenarios where there was some kind of ethical misconduct where the scientific practice required value judgements (e.g using unpublished data in their own work). We looked at how the fellowship affected the scientists' ability to recognize ethical dimensions regarding the scenarios. We found that this fellowship improved moral sensitivity, but their moral reasoning does not improve. We outlined our approach on how to look at scientists' ethical decision making and made recommendations on how to improve our approach. This work can inform future ethical training to align better with what scientists value and introduce useful concepts from philosophy and psychology to education research in physics.

Physics Education,History and Philosophy of Physics,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper explores the influence of value focus discussions on scientists' ethical decision-making. The research indicates that despite many scientists believing that science is value-neutral, both epistemic and non-epistemic values structurally impact scientific research. Current ethics training often focuses on imparting high-order ethical concepts or rules, but it is considered ineffective. The paper advocates for ethics training that links values with science to enhance scientists' ethical decision-making capabilities.

The paper cites philosophical and psychological theories, particularly the four-component model, to define ethical decision-making, including moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral implementation. The study established a year-long seminar involving 14 science teachers from different disciplines who discussed values in scientific norms. Through interviews conducted before and after the seminar, the research found that this type of seminar can improve scientists' moral sensitivity, but there was no significant improvement in moral reasoning ability.

The research also highlights that current ethics training, such as Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training, primarily focuses on topics such as authorship, conflicts of interest, research misconduct, and protection of human subjects, while neglecting the breadth of ethical issues scientists face in their actual work. The paper emphasizes that scientists inevitably make value judgments in scientific practice and, therefore, ethics training should pay more attention to these practical values and introduce concepts from philosophy and psychology into physical science education research.

In conclusion, this paper aims to address how to enhance scientists' ethical decision-making processes by emphasizing values in science and proposes recommendations to improve existing ethics training methods.