Abstract:This paper investigates whether the selective use of technology can begin to overcome the challenge of large cohort teaching and deliver an enhanced student learning experience. It describes the initial development and evaluation of a campus‐based management course taught to 270 third year engineering undergraduates at The University of Manchester. The course is structured around weekly keynote lectures, supplemented with extensive use of a virtual learning environment (VLE) and key Web 2.0 applications. The preliminary findings are that technology is not a panacea: face‐to‐face contact with teaching staff remains the priority for most students. Nevertheless, the VLE was found to improve the student learning experience provided that • Use of technology does not reduce face‐to‐face teaching time; • Teaching faculty acknowledges that students are, for the most part, highly strategic learners, engaging deeper with those technology tools that help them achieve their desired course outcomes; • Close attention is paid to learning design, aligning technology tools with the desired learning outcomes. Use of technology does not reduce face‐to‐face teaching time; Teaching faculty acknowledges that students are, for the most part, highly strategic learners, engaging deeper with those technology tools that help them achieve their desired course outcomes; Close attention is paid to learning design, aligning technology tools with the desired learning outcomes. Further work is now required to explore more effectively the use of the VLE and Web 2.0 as a vehicle for promoting collaborative learning. In addition, the authors will be redesigning course activities, both assessed and unassessed, to start to address the more lofty ambition of moving students from an acquisitive to a participative model of learning. What is already known about this topic • There is an ongoing debate about the effectiveness of learning technology in enhancing the student learning experience. • There are a number of published case studies describing and evaluating the effectiveness of VLEs in enhancing student learning across a range of disciplines, the majority of which involve small‐ to medium‐sized cohorts. • Learning technology can be used to achieve more constructivist pedagogical principles. There is an ongoing debate about the effectiveness of learning technology in enhancing the student learning experience. There are a number of published case studies describing and evaluating the effectiveness of VLEs in enhancing student learning across a range of disciplines, the majority of which involve small‐ to medium‐sized cohorts. Learning technology can be used to achieve more constructivist pedagogical principles. What this paper adds • A well‐conducted case study of the use of learning technology to enhance large cohort teaching. • A critical review of the literature on the use of learning technology to enhance student learning. • An empirical contribution to the debate on whether learning technology can enhance the student learning experience. A well‐conducted case study of the use of learning technology to enhance large cohort teaching. A critical review of the literature on the use of learning technology to enhance student learning. An empirical contribution to the debate on whether learning technology can enhance the student learning experience. Implications for practice and/or policy • Technology is not a panacea to enable higher education institutions to do more with less. • Technology can enhance the student learning experience provided that it does not reduce face‐to‐face teaching time. • In utilising learning technology, close attention should be paid to learning design, aligning technology tools with the desired learning outcomes. Technology is not a panacea to enable higher education institutions to do more with less. Technology can enhance the student learning experience provided that it does not reduce face‐to‐face teaching time. In utilising learning technology, close attention should be paid to learning design, aligning technology tools with the desired learning outcomes.

A few small steps or giant leap? De-densify the curriculum in one move

Evaluation of Student Academic Performance After Curricular Content Reduction

Reducing Student Workload Through Curricular Efficiency

A doctor of pharmacy curriculum revision process focused on curricular overload

Learning pathways composed of core subjects with features of reducing cognitive load have better learning outcomes

Culture transformation by stealth: Leveraging incremental change to revamp the curriculum

A Planning Tool for Incorporating Backward Design, Active Learning, and Authentic Assessment in the College Classroom

Assessment of non-time-intensive changes to a management course to address course evaluation scores

Implications of immersive scheduling for student achievement and feedback

Link to Life and Learning

Residents Are Coming: A Faculty Development Curriculum to Prepare a Community Site For New Learners

REACH: A Required Curriculum to Foster the Well-Being of Medical Students

HEAL: an instructional design model applied to an online clerkship in family medicine

Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered

Immersive learning in a block teaching model: A case study of academic reform through principles, policies and practice

Digital or didactic: Using learning technology to confront the challenge of large cohort teaching

It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms

Competency-based and less time-bound: a new approach to the macro-structure of a medical school curriculum

Applying cognitive load theory to the redesign of a conventional database systems course

Innovative curriculum: Integrating the bio-behavioral and social science principles across the LifeStages in basic science years

Working Smarter: Using Universal Design for Learning to Spiral Curriculum in Small Special Education Preparation Programs