Sour taste cells functionally identified

W. Meyerhof

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.155960

2008-06-01

Journal of Physiology

Abstract:The sense of taste enables mammals to evaluate their food for the presence of calories and toxins and regulates intake behaviour with regard to the needs of energy balance (Simon et al. 2006). In this context, the five basic tastes, sweet, umami, bitter, salty and sour, fulfil specific tasks with sour taste warning against acids in unripe fruits or spoiled food (Lindemann, 2001). Understanding of how the oral detection of taste stimuli is linked to neuronal ensembles that guide behavioural output requires the elucidation of the functional organization of the peripheral and central gustatory system. Processing of gustatory information begins in oral taste buds, assemblies of ∼100 specialized epithelial cells (Roper, 2007). One population of principal taste cells, Type II or receptor cells, largely lacks neuronal markers and depolarizes in response to sapid stimuli but not to KCl. It effectively segregates into subpopulations detecting l-amino acids/ribonucleotides, sweet or bitter compounds that are identified by their cognate heptahelical receptors. These cells release ATP through gap junction hemichannels and stimulate purinergic 2X2/2X3 receptors present on afferent nerves and on Type III or presynaptic cells, which constitute the other population of principal taste cells. Type III cells are depolarized by KCl but not sapid stimuli, for which they lack receptors. They express various neural markers, make synapses with the afferents and release serotonin. Much less is known with regard to the cells, receptors and transduction of salty and sour taste. Recently, PKD2L1 and PKD1L3, two members of the family of transient receptor potential channels, have been identified in a subset of taste bud cells distinct from sweet, umami or bitter cells (Chandrashekar et al. 2006). Intriguingly, PKD2L1 cells coexpress various Type III cell marker proteins and synapse with the afferents (Kataoka et al. 2008). Ablation of these cells by PKD2L1 gene targeting experiments caused a selective loss of neurophysiological and behavioural responses to sour stimuli, suggesting that PKD2L1 expressing cells may constitute the sour taste sensors (Chandrashekar et al. 2006). However, this significant work left some important questions unanswered. Whereas it is clear that the PKD2L1 expressing cell population includes sour cells, it is less clear whether PKD2L1 is exclusively located in sour cells, or what the precise role of this protein for sour taste transduction might be. In this respect the work reported by Huang et al. (2008) in this issue of The Journal of Physiology is a big step forward. These researchers measured acid-induced rises in [Ca2+]i in single isolated taste cells, which they have classified by their functional properties into Type II or Type III cells, and in intact taste bud cells in slices of vallate papillae. Moreover, they used cells genetically engineered to express transmitter receptors as innovative biosensors to demonstrate neurotransmitter release from the cell under study. With a combination of these elegant techniques, Huang et al. made three important discoveries. Firstly, they demonstrate convincingly that the presynaptic Type III cells respond to acids with Ca2+ influx, thereby functionally identifying unequivocally this population as the principle sour sensors. Secondly, they identified serotonin as the transmitter released from Type III cells in response to sour stimuli. Thirdly, the present paper solves the longstanding puzzling observation that weak organic acids are more intensely sour than strong mineral acids (Da Conceicao Neta et al. 2007). By using acetic acid as a stimulus of varying molarity at constant pH versus varying pH at constant molarity, Huang et al. also clearly demonstrate that the active sour stimulus is the protonated organic acid and not the extracellular protons themselves. Protonated organic acids permeate the cell membrane and dissociate in the cytosol. Thus, the present report firmly supports the conjecture that the proximate sour stimulus is a drop in intracellular pH (Lyall et al. 2001). The work of Huang and colleagues not only resolves three major problems of taste research, it also gives direction to future research by raising a number of important new questions. Firstly, which mechanism links the drop in pHi to Ca2+ influx and transmitter release? In the past, researchers mainly focused on membrane channels gated by extracellular protons as candidate sour ‘receptors’ (Roper, 2007), but now they are challenged to identify candidate genes sensitive to intracellular protons. Secondly, does the serotonin released from Type III cells act as the transmitter at synapses which activate the afferent nerves, or does it act locally as a paracrine factor? Finally, given the finding that receptor cells release ATP, which acts on afferent fibres and Type III cells alike (Roper, 2007), it is obvious to ask whether the sour-responsive presynaptic type III cells also play a role in the transduction of other taste qualities. Probably, in the near future researchers will unravel some of the taste bud's outstanding mysteries.