Abstract:Study design: A retrospective study. Objective: To analyze and compare the sagittal spinopelvic alignment variation after implantation of purely dynamic and hybrid pedicle screw-based stabilization systems, seeking for its clinical implication. Summary of background data: Numerous studies have investigated the kinematic features of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization systems since their clinical application. However, there is a lack of literature concerning their influence on the sagittal spinopelvic alignment, which has been proved to be important in the development of future adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Methods: Lateral standing lumbar radiographs of 29 patients (17 males, 12 females, 27 to 64 y) who were implanted with purely dynamic (Dynesys: group A, n=15) or hybrid (FlexPLUS: group B, n=14) stabilization systems, and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, have been reviewed. These parameters were measured using Spineview software and were compared within and between groups: L1 to S1 lordosis, lordosis of instrumented segments (ISL), cranial adjacent segment lordosis (CASL) next to the instrumentation, highest instrumented segment lordosis (HISL), pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt. Results: Preoperative lordosis parameters were not significantly different between group A and B. The average L1 to S1 lordosis decreased from 55.3 degrees preoperatively to 52.6 degrees postoperatively in group A (P=0.007) and from 60.2 degrees to 59.3 degrees in group B (P=0.054). There was no significant difference between both groups (P=0.083). The average ISL decreased from 25.9 degrees preoperatively to 21.7 degrees postoperatively (P=0.00002) in group A and from 30.0 degrees to 28.6 degrees in group B (P=0.153). The prepostoperative ISL variation was significantly different between group A and B (P=0.015). The average HISL decreased from 9.5 degrees to 6.2 degrees in group A (P=0.0007) and from 13.1 degrees to 12.4 degrees in group B (P=0.295). The loss of HISL was significantly greater (P=0.010) in group A than in group B. The average CASL increased from 6.9 degrees to 9.2 degrees (P=0.013) in group A. The CASL variation from 10.6 degrees to 10.4 degrees was not significant (P=0.763) in group B. When comparing both groups, the difference of CASL variation was statistically significant (P=0.043). The pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt did not change significantly before and after instrumentation in both groups. Conclusions: On the basis of the result of this study, the hybrid stabilization system could better preserve the lordosis of instrumented segments and subsequently reduce the extent of compensatory lordosis increase at the cranial adjacent segment. This could theoretically prevent the development of an ASD. The long-term outcome and the correlation between lordosis-preserving capacity and ASD need to be further prospectively analyzed.

Surgical tips for the implantation of BDYNTM dynamic stabilization system: combining spinal navigation with motion preservation for low-grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Minimally Invasive Approach for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Lateral Single-Position Surgery with Intraoperative Computed Tomography Navigation and Fluoroscopy: A Technical Note

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND ACCURACY IN TRANSPEDICULAR SCREW FIXATION USING INTRAOPERATIVE CT-GUIDED NAVIGATION FOR LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

Index-level fusion and adjacent segment disease following dynamic stabilization for lumbar degenerative disc disease: illustrative case

Revision surgery of spinal dynamic implants: a literature review and algorithm proposal

The one-stop-shop approach: Navigating lumbar 360-degree instrumentation in a single position

Use of Dynamic Spinal Instruments (Dynesys) in Adult Spinal Deformities According to Silva–Lenke and Berjano–Lamartina Classifications

Influence of 2 different dynamic stabilization systems on sagittal spinopelvic alignment

Surgical management of high-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis associated with Hajdu-Cheney syndrome: illustrative case

Anatomical Reduction of Spondylolisthesis Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: An Intraoperative Technical Note

Biomechanical Analysis of a Newly Proposed Surgical Combination (MIS Screw-Rod System for Indirect Decompression+ Interspinous Fusion System for long Term Spinal Stability) in Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

Single bypass fixation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: Anatomical insights and technical note

A Hybrid Dynamic Stabilization and Fusion System in Multilevel Lumbar Spondylosis

Short-term effects of minimally invasive dynamic neutralization system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

Dynamic Stabilization System in Addition to Decompression for the Degenerative Spinal Stenosis.

Innovative 3D Navigation Module for Precise Unilateral Pedicle Screw Combined with Contralateral Translaminar Facet Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery

Creation and application of individual navigation templates in surgical treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine

Single-Position Fluoroscopy-Guided Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Intraoperative Computed Tomography–Navigated Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation: Technical Report and Literature Review

Comparison Between Dynamic Stabilization and Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2019: biomechanical changes in dynamic sagittal balance and lower limb compensatory strategies following realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity patients

Biomechanical investigation of the effect of pedicle-based hybrid stabilization constructs: A finite element study