Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the anteroposterior (AP) position and inclination of the maxillary incisors in subjects with class I normal occlusion and a harmonious profile with patients with skeletal class III malocclusions, and to investigate the changes in maxillary incisor inclination and AP position after surgical-orthodontic treatment in class III patients.Material and methods: Sixty-five subjects (35 female and 30 male; mean age: 21.8 +/- 3.89 years) with normal profiles and class I skeletal and dental patterns were selected as a control sample. Sixty-seven patients (38 female and 29 male; mean age: 21.3 +/- 3.31 years) with skeletal and dental class III malocclusions who sought surgical-orthodontic treatment were used as the study sample. Subjects were asked to smile and profile photographs were taken with the head in a natural position and the maxillary central incisors and the forehead in full view; cephalograms were taken and superimposed on the profile pictures according to the outline of the forehead and nose. Forehead inclination, maxillary incisor facial inclination and the AP position of the maxillary central incisor relative to the forehead (FAFFA) were measured on the integrated images and statistical analyses were performed.Results: In both groups, there were no significant male/female differences in either the maxillary central incisor inclination or AP position. Female subjects had a significantly steeper forehead inclination compared with males (P < 0.001) in both groups. After combined surgical-orthodontic treatment, the significant labial inclination (P < 0.001) and posterior positioning (P < 0.001) of the maxillary central incisors had been corrected to close to normal range (P> 0.05). In the control group, 84.6% had the facial axial point (FA) of their maxillary central incisors positioned between lines through the forehead facial axis (FFA) point and the glabella. In the study group, however, 79.1% had the maxillary central incisors positioned posterior to the line through the FFA point and the difference with the control group was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The position of the maxillary central incisors was strongly correlated with forehead inclination in the control sample (r(2) = 0.456; P < 0.01), but only a poor correlation was detected in the class III group (r(2) = 0.177; P> 0.05).Conclusions: With the integrated radiograph photograph method, the lateral cephalogram was reoriented, which makes it possible to accurately measure the variables on profile photographs. The AP position and inclination of the maxillary central incisors relative to the forehead plays an important role in the esthetics of the profile during smiling and could be an important variable to be considered during diagnosis and treatment planning. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Influence of social media and corrected smile photographs in patients with malocclusion

The effects of images posted to social media by orthodontists on public perception of professional credibility and willingness to become a client

Evaluation of the impact of orthodontists' smile with malocclusions on social media and professional credibility

Social media and orthodontics: Are our patients scrolling?

Social, intellectual, psychological, and attractiveness judgements of lay people about patients before and after combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment

Perceptions towards orthodontic marketing through social media among young adults seeking orthodontic treatment: a qualitative study

Role of Sagittal and Oblique Smiling Profiles in Evaluating Facial Esthetics

Relationship between perception of smile esthetics and orthodontic treatment in Spanish patients

Connectivity and Integration of Instagram® Use in the Lives of Dental Students and Professionals: A Country-Wide Cross-Sectional Study Using the InstaAA© Questionnaire

Changes in smile parameters after surgical-orthodontic treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion

Study of influence of orthodontic controllable smile characteristic indexes on smile esthetics

Evaluation of Change in the Facial Profile and Aesthetics in Relation to Incisor Position in Both Maxillary and Mandibular Arches

Effect of maxillary incisor labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position on smiling profile esthetics.

Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons for Indian facial profiles: A cross-sectional study

Assessment of Aesthetic Smile Components in Patients With Skeletal Class II Vertical and Horizontal Growth Patterns Compared to Class I Cases

Impact of Orthodontic-Induced Facial Morphology Changes on Aesthetic Evaluation: a Retrospective Study

Changes in Anteroposterior Position and Inclination of the Maxillary Incisors after Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions.

A short-term evaluation of oral hygiene education methods in fixed orthodontics patients: a randomized clinical trial comparing assistant training, software, and social media

Psychological Impact and Perceptions of Orthodontic Treatment of Adult Patients with Different Motivations.

SELF-PERCEPTION OF DENTAL APPEARANCE AND AWARENESS TOWARDS ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AND INTERNS OF DENTISTRY

Perceived Effects of Orthognathic Surgery versus Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment of Convex Facial Profile Patients