Abstract:Spatial patterns in population trends, particularly those at fine geographic scales, can help better understand the factors driving population change in North American birds. The standard trend models for the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) were designed to estimate changes in relative abundance through time (trend) within broad geographic strata, such as countries, Bird Conservation Regions, U.S. states, and Canadian territories or provinces. Calculating trend estimates at the level of the BBS's individual survey transects ("routes") allows exploration of finer spatial patterns and estimation of the effects of covariates, such as habitat loss or annual weather, on both relative abundance and trend. Here, we describe four related hierarchical Bayesian models that estimate trends for individual BBS routes. All four models estimate route-level trends and relative abundances using a hierarchical structure that shares information among routes, and three of the models share information in a spatially explicit way. The spatial models use either an intrinsic Conditional Autoregressive (iCAR) structure or a distance-based Gaussian Process (GP) to estimate the spatial components. We fit all four models to data for 71 species and then, because of the intensive computations required, fit two of the models (one spatial and one non-spatial) for an additional 216 species. In a leave-future-out cross-validation, the spatial models outperformed the non-spatial models for 284 out of 287 species. The best approach to modeling the spatial components depends on the species being modeled; the Gaussian Process had the highest predictive accuracy for 69% of the species tested here and the iCAR was better for the remaining 31%. We also present two examples of route-level covariate analyses focused on spatial and temporal variation in habitat for Rufous Hummingbird ( Selasphorus rufus ) and Horned Grebe ( Podiceps auritus ). In both examples, the inclusion of covariates improved our understanding of the patterns in the rate of population change for both species. Route-level models for BBS data are useful for visualizing spatial patterns of population change, generating hypotheses on the causes of change, comparing patterns of change among regions and species, and testing hypotheses on causes of change with relevant covariates. The post Patterns and drivers of population trends on individual Breeding Bird Survey routes using spatially explicit models and route-level covariates first appeared on Avian Conservation and Ecology.

Not all who wander are lost: Trail bias in community science

Sampling Biases Shape Our View of the Natural World

Data gap or biodiversity gap? Evaluating apparent spatial biases in community science observations of Odonata in the east-central United States

Do Seasonal Species Assemblages Differ in Their Biogeography? Evidence from the Spatial Structure of Bird Communities on Land‐bridge Islands

Patterns and drivers of population trends on individual Breeding Bird Survey routes using spatially explicit models and route-level covariates

Effectively and Accurately Mapping Global Biodiversity Patterns for Different Regions and Taxa

Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance

Tracking data as an alternative to resighting data for inferring population ranges

Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Volunteer Data Contribution Activities: A Case Study of eBird

Measuring metrics: what diversity indicators are most appropriate for different forms of data bias?

A quixotic view of spatial bias in modelling the distribution of species and their diversity

Random versus Game Trail-Based Camera Trap Placement Strategy for Monitoring Terrestrial Mammal Communities

Quantifying the accuracy of location data and spatial ecology inferences from GPS tags in two rare, co-occurring turtle species differing in habitat use

Non-detection during excursions by citizen scientists modeled as a function of weather, season, list length, and individual preferences

Animal tracking moves community ecology: Opportunities and challenges

Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife–habitat models

Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models

Big data, big problems? How to circumvent problems in biodiversity mapping and ensure meaningful results

Biodiversity time series are biased towards increasing species richness in changing environments

Biodiversity shows unique responses to land-use change across regional biomes

The data double standard