Abstract:Pyrolysis of natural gas to produce H2 and solid carbon through methane cracking can be characterized as a high-CH4, low-CO2 process. It results in low CO2 emissions because no direct CO2 is generated at the point of H2 generation if solid carbon is not combusted further. However, it results in high CH4 emissions because of its higher natural gas consumption compared to the direct use of natural gas and, thus, higher CH4 losses along the natural gas supply chain. Here, I analyzed whether this process can provide climate benefit in comparison to the direct, unabated utilization of natural gas and also in comparison with H2 produced from water electrolysis with grid electricity. To this end, Monte Carlo simulations of time-resolved and US state-specific emission profiles and their impact on mid-century global warming under different CH4 mitigation scenarios were conducted. It was found that the climate benefit of natural gas pyrolysis is highly dependent on plant location and the speed at which CH4 emissions can be abated. New York, Pennsylvania, and Ohio emerged as the most promising locations. This is because of their projected long reliance on natural gas for power generation, which renders electrolysis using grid electricity less attractive, as well as the relatively low estimate of current CH4 emissions from the natural gas supply chain. However, without fast action on CH4 emission mitigation, the climate benefit of natural gas pyrolysis is small or non-existent, irrespective of the plant location. Overall, the uncertainty in the relative climate benefit of natural gas pyrolysis was found to be large; however, this study developed an easy-to-adapt MS Excel/VBA tool that can be updated as soon as more accurate data on CH4 emissions becomes available. Policymakers, businesspeople, and scholars can use this tool to estimate the climate impact within their own scenarios and locations.

Geospatial variation in carbon accounting of hydrogen production and implications for the US Inflation Reduction Act

Environmental life-cycle analysis of hydrogen technology pathways in the United States

Hydrogen Production Via Ammonia from Methane Integrated with Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Techno-Economic Analysis

Green with Envy? Hydrogen production in a carbon-constrained world

Technological evolution of large-scale blue hydrogen production toward the U.S. Hydrogen Energy Earthshot

Inflation Reduction Act impacts on the economics of clean hydrogen and liquid fuels

Geospatial Life Cycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chains

On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production

How green is blue hydrogen?

Navigating the Implementation of Tax Credits for Natural-Gas-Based Low-Carbon-Intensity Hydrogen Projects

Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen

Carbon utilization in natural gas-based hydrogen production via carbon dioxide electrolysis: Towards cost-competitive clean hydrogen

Fossil Capitalism’s Lock-ins: The Natural Gas-Hydrogen Nexus

Is hydrogen production through natural gas pyrolysis compatible with ambitious climate targets in the United States? A location-specific, time-resolved analysis

Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Production Processes: Turquoise Hydrogen vs. Steam Methane Reforming

Decarbonizing Singapore Via Local Production of H2 from Natural Gas

On the cost competitiveness of blue and green hydrogen

A Methodology for Fueling Mobility Markets with Hydrogen from Natural Gas plus Carbon Capture and Sequestration

Emissions from natural hydrogen

Unlocking Potential for Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production from U.S. Natural Gas Resources

Using Blue Hydrogen to Decarbonize Heavy Oil and Oil Sands Operations in Canada