Understanding user experience and normative data in pharyngeal residue rating scales used in flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): A scoping review
Thomas Wilson Martin Checklin Nadine Lawson Alissa J. Burnett Theresa Lombardo Amy Freeman-Sanderson 1 Footscray Hospital,Western Health,Footscray,Australia2 Deakin University,Geelong,Australia,Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN),School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,Geelong,Australia3 Austin Hospital,Austin Health,Heidelberg,Australia4 Epworth Healthcare,Richmond,Australia5 Discipline of Speech Pathology,School of Allied Health,Human Services and Sport,La Trobe University,Melbourne,Australia6 Speech Pathology & Dietetics,Cabrini Health,Malvern,Australia7 Graduate School of Health,University of Technology Sydney,Sydney,Australia8 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital,Sydney,Australia9 Critical Care Division,Faculty of Medicine,The George Institute for Global Health,UNSW Sydney,Sydney,Australia10 Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC),School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,Monash University,Melbourne,Australia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2420606
2024-11-12
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Abstract:Purpose Pharyngeal residue rating scales are often used to rate pharyngeal residue observed during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Despite the widespread use of pharyngeal residue rating scales, there is no data that has systematically explored user experience. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate specific reporting of user experience, user centred design principles, and normative data in the development of pharyngeal residue rating scales.
rehabilitation,audiology & speech-language pathology,linguistics