Abstract:BACKGROUND: <AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND">Speech and language therapists and nurses need to work together to keep patients with swallowing difficulties safe throughout their acute stroke admission. Speech and language therapists make recommendations for safe swallowing following assessment and nurses put recommendations into practice and monitor how patients cope. There has been little research into the everyday realities of ongoing swallow safety management by these two disciplines. Patient safety research in other fields of healthcare indicates that safety can be enhanced through understanding the cultural context in which risk decisions are made.</AbstractText>AIMS: <AbstractText Label="AIMS">To generate new understanding for how speech and language therapists (SLTs) and nurses share information for ongoing management of swallows safety on stroke units.</AbstractText>METHODS & PROCEDURES: <AbstractText Label="METHODS &amp; PROCEDURES">An ethnographic methodology involving 40 weeks of fieldwork on three stroke wards in England between 2015 and 2017. Fieldwork observation (357 h) and interviews with 43 members of SLT and nursing staff. Observational and interview data were analysed iteratively using techniques from the constant comparative method to create a thematically organized explanation.</AbstractText>OUTCOMES & RESULTS: <AbstractText Label="OUTCOMES &amp; RESULTS">An explanation for how disciplinary differences in time and space influenced how SLT and nursing staff shared information for ongoing management of swallow safety, based around three themes: (1) SLTs and nurses were aligned in concern for swallow safety across all information-sharing routes; however, (2) ambiguity was introduced by the need for the information contained in swallowing recommendations to travel across time, creating dilemmas for nurses. Patients could improve or deteriorate after recommendations were made and nurses had competing demands on their time. Ambiguity had consequences for (3) critical incident reporting and relationships. SLTs experienced dilemmas over how to act when recommendations were not followed.</AbstractText>CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: <AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS &amp; IMPLICATIONS">This study provides new understanding for patient safety dilemmas associated with the enactment and oversight of swallowing recommendations in context, on stroke wards. Findings can support SLTs and nurses to explore together how information for ongoing dysphagia management can be safely implemented within ward realities and kept up to date. This could include considering nursing capacity to act when SLTs are not there, mealtime staffing and SLT 7-day working. Together they can review their understanding of risk and preferred local and formal routes for learning from it.</AbstractText>WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: <AbstractText Label="WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS">What is already known on the subject It is known that information to keep swallowing safe is shared through swallowing recommendations, which are understood to involve a balance of risks between optimizing the safety of the swallow mechanism and maintaining physiological and emotional health. There is increasing appreciation from patient safety research, of the importance of understanding the context in which hospital staff make decisions about risk and patient safety. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The paper provides new empirical understanding for the complexities of risk management associated with SLT and nursing interactions and roles with respect to ongoing swallow safety. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Findings can underpin SLT and nurse discussion about how swallow safety could be improved in their own settings.</AbstractText>

Experiences of dysphagia trained nurses in the screening and early management of swallowing in acute stroke: A qualitative study

Nursing Adherence, Barriers and Facilitators to Conduct Post-Stroke Dysphagia Screening and Assessment: A Study Based on Theoretical Domain Framework

The Efficacy of Electromyographic Biofeedback Combined with Swallowing Training on Post-Stroke Dysphagia

Nurses’ practices in stroke-related dysphagia in low- and middle-income countries

Experiences of Dysphagia after Stroke: An Interview Study of Stroke Survivors and Their Informal Caregivers

Dysphagia screening among stroke patients in a tertiary hospital: a best practice implementation project

The assessment of dysphagia after stroke: state of the art and future directions

Advancing stroke patient care: a network meta-analysis of dysphagia screening efficacy and personalization

Exploring facilitators and barriers associated with oral care for inpatients with dysphagia post-stroke

RN dysphagia screening, a stepwise approach

Experiences and Perceptions of Stroke Patients Living with Dysphagia: A Qualitative Meta‐synthesis

Nurse-led dysphagia screening in the intensive care unit - An implementation study

Oral intake of solid medications in patients with post‐stroke dysphagia. A challenge for nurses?

Managing ongoing swallow safety through information‐sharing: An ethnography of speech and language therapists and nurses at work on stroke units

Abstract TP121: Using Visual Cues to Improve Dysphagia Screening Compliance in Acute Stroke Patients

Identification of a know-do gap: An observational study of the assessment and treatment of dysphagia during inpatient stroke rehabilitation in primary healthcare in Norway

Detection, evaluation, and management of aspiration in rehabilitation hospitals: role of the otolaryngologist--head and neck surgeon

Post-stroke dysphagia: an analysis of the competences of the care processes of the interdisciplinary team

Nursing Interventions for Identifying and Managing Acute Dysphagia are Effective for Improving Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review Update

Implementation strategies to improve evidence-based practice for post-stroke dysphagia identification and management: A before-and-after study

Advances in nursing of dysphagia after stroke