Abstract:Study design: A randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial. Objective: To assess and compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between low-speed drilling without irrigation and high-speed drilling with irrigation for implant site preparation. Patients and methods: The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki principles, obtained approval from the local Ethics Committee, was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, and was written in accordance with CONSORT guidelines. Included were adult patients with single posterior edentulism who exhibited good oral hygiene, sufficient bone dimensions for implant placement, adequate keratinized mucosa, stable occlusion, and a healthy periodontium. Patients were randomly assigned to either the test group (low-speed drilling (150 rpm) without irrigation) or the control group (high-speed drilling (800 rpm) with irrigation). A single dental implant was placed for each patient, with all surgeries conducted by the same experienced operator according to a standardized protocol. Patient satisfaction during surgery, including drilling-time perception, vibration, pressure, noise, comfort, and drowning sensation, as well as postoperative pain and inflammation, were assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated using a 5-graded Likert scale for mouth opening, chewing, speaking, sleeping, daily routine, and job. Follow up extended on daily basis for 7 days. The PROMs were collected and analyzed in a blinded manner by independent researchers and a statistician to prevent bias. Results: The study included 66 patients (33 males and 33 females) with a mean age of 54.5 years. Patients in the test group reported a lower perception of drilling time, vibration, and noise but a higher perception of pressure compared to the control group; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Compared to the test group, patients in the control group experienced significantly greater drowning sensation and lesser comfort measures (p < 0.001). There was a moderate inverse correlation between drowning sensation and comfort (r = -0.57). The real drilling time was significantly longer in the test group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The test group reported significantly lower pain levels during the first 12 h (p < 0.05), and significantly lower inflammation levels at the second day (p < 0.05) compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed between the groups at any time point for any of the QOL parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusion: For a single implant site preparation, low-speed drilling without irrigation seems to offer greater patient comfort compared to high-speed drilling with irrigation, mainly due to reduced drowning sensation. Patients reported less postoperative pain and inflammation with the low-speed technique. Confirming these findings will require more research.

Effect of operators' proficiency level and patients' related factors on possible complications, using a high frequency polyamide sonic intracanal irrigation device: A prospective clinical cohort study

The effect of the irrigant activation protocol on postoperative pain in maxillary incisors with asymptomatic apical periodontitis: A three-arm randomized clinical trial

Slow drilling technique may enhance peri-operative patient-reported outcomes in dental implant surgery

Effect of guided conservative endodontic access and different file kinematics on debris extrusion in mesial root of the mandibular molars: An in vitro study

The Effect of Final Irrigation Agitation Techniques on Postoperative Pain after Single Visit Root Canal Treatment of Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Influence of sonic activation of epoxy-resin and calcium silicate sealer on postoperative pain: a patient-blinded, parallel group, randomized clinical trial

Effects of Endodontic Irrigants on Material and Surface Properties of Biocompatible Thermoplastics

Passive ultrasonic irrigation on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial

Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher, Endoactivator, and PUI agitation in the penetration of intracanal medicaments into dentinal tubules: A confocal laser scanning microscope analysis

Subgingival instrumentation to remove simulated plaque in vitro: influence of operators’ experience and type of instrument

Evaluation of efficacy of chlorhexidine intracanal medicament on the periodontal healing of concomitant endodontic-periodontal lesions without communication: an interventional study

A retrospective study on 1592 consecutively performed operations in one private referral clinic. Part I: Early inflammation and early implant failures

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Sonic and Ultrasonic Root Canal Irrigation Activation Protocols in Patients with Non-vital Teeth Associated with Apical Periodontitis (Randomized Clinical Trial

Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic activation on irrigant penetration in different tapered preparations: An in vitro study

Adjunctive clinical effect of a water-cooled Nd:YAG laser in a periodontal maintenance care programme: a randomized controlled trial

In vitro, clinical, and microbiological evaluation of a linear oscillating device for scaling and root planing

Comparison of ultrasonic versus side-vented needle irrigation for reductions in bacterial growth and postoperative pain: A randomized controlled trial

The antibacterial effect and the incidence of post-operative pain after the application of nano-based intracanal medications during endodontic retreatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Incidence of postoperative pain after using single continuous, single reciprocating, and full sequence continuous rotary file system: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Efficacy of mechanical/physical approaches for implant surface decontamination in non-surgical submarginal instrumentation of peri-implantitis. A systematic review

Reducing Apical Bacterial Extrusion: The Impact of Reciproc File Size and Irrigation Technique