Abstract:In recent years, the concepts of footprint family and planetary boundaries have both received considerable popularity in the field of sustainability science. By reviewing the conceptual roots of these two concepts, we argue that they are complements to each other and thus should be used collectively in assessing the environmental sustainability of the planet, nations, regions, etc. Building on the complementary nature of the footprint and boundary indicators, this paper proposes, for the first time, a framework for defining and assessing environmental sustainability from a novel point of view, in which the footprints and boundaries are measured and compared in a coherent manner. The footprint family is defined as a measure of the regenerative and absorptive capacity of the Earth’s ecosystems to satisfy mankind’s demand for natural resources and waste emissions. The planetary boundaries are defined as a measure of the Earth’s maximum regenerative and absorptive capacity that allows to define a safe operating space for humanity. As such, environmental sustainability can be simply defined as a safe state in which man’s environmental footprints are kept within the related planetary boundaries;otherwise it refers to environmental unsustainability. The environmental sustainability concept is featured by completeness, selectivity, interactivity, uncertainty, scale-dependence, and the negotiability of environmental deficit. The implications of the footprint-boundary integrated framework are illustrated by reference to the assessment and ranking of 30 major nations’ environmental sustainability with regard to carbon emissions (climate change), water use and land use. The results show that, in the case of carbon emissions, 22 nations are found to be unsustainable, of which the United States of America has the highest carbon deficit per capita of 26.1 t·a-1 (in CO2 equivalent). In the case of water use, Spain, which has a water deficit per capita of 1 497.8 m3·a-1, ranks the highest among the 17 nations that are found to be unsustainable. In the case of land use, the Dutch land deficit per capita (2.3 hm2·a-1) is significantly larger than that of other 14 nations which are classified as unsustainable. Our findings suggest that the sustainability of carbon emissions is in close relation to the nation’s level of social and economic development. The contribution of developed countries to global climate change, therefore, appears to be much higher than that of developing countries. The sustainability of water and land use is often driven by the average amount of water and land resource within the border of the nation that can be appropriated by an individual citizen. This paper provides a reference for quantifying and ranking the national performance on environmental sustainability. The framework established can also be applied to other environmental issues or at sub-national scales.

Determining sustainability using the Environmental Performance Index and Human Development Index - An alternative approach to the Environmental Human Index through a holistic quantitative dynamic framework

The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene

Relationship Between Environmental Sustainability and Human Development Index: A Case of Selected South Asian Nations

Human development at the cost of the environment?-an application of planetary pressures-adjusted human development index in the lens of planetary boundaries

Quantifying Human Well‐being for Sustainability Research and Policy

A rapid sustainability dynamic assessment of the USA and China 1995-2018

A Global Assessment of Sustainable Development Based on Modification of the Human Development Index via the Entropy Method

A Thermo-Economic Measure of Sustainability

Sustainability assessment of water resource systems using a novel hydro-socio-economic index (HSEI)

Going Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: an Index System of Human Dependence on Ecosystem Services

Multidimensional Assessment of National Environmental Sustainability Based on Footprint Family and Planetary Boundaries

Unveiling global sustainability boundaries: exploring inner dimensions of human critical determinants for sustainability

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Decision Support for Informing Global Sustainable Development: A Human-Centric AI-Thinking Approach

Investigating the Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Human Development Index: A Comparative Study on Countries and Regions in the Eastern Hemisphere from the Perspective of Evolution

An Exploratory DEA and Machine Learning Framework for the Evaluation and Analysis of Sustainability Composite Indicators in the EU

Unleashing the Influence Mechanism of Technology Innovation and Human Development for Ecological Sustainability in Emerging Countries

System dynamics modelling coupled with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for sustainability-related policy analysis and decision-making in the built environment

Achieving Sustainability through Environmental Social Governance Reporting: Overcoming the Challenges

The Interconnections between Renewable Energy, Economic Development and Environmental Pollution: A Simultaneous Equation System Approach

Dichotomous impacts on social and environmental sustainability: competitiveness and development levels matter

Applying DPSIR to sustainable development