Testing dogs for immunity against Canine Parvovirus , Canine Distemper Virus and Infectious Canine Hepatitis

J. D. Lund,M. Prior,L. Madsen

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Sustainable Economic Development in China: Balancing Growth and Environmental Concerns

Junye Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/ajhsj891

2024-07-10

International Journal of Religion

Abstract:Purpose: Over the last three decades, China’s economy has grown remarkably, ranking second in the world among all countries. China’s market-oriented policies, which give priority to economic development, are credited with the country’s economic boom. China’s remarkable economic growth in recent years has had a significant effect on the environmental balance of the nation. Presently, Chinese authorities must address environmental issues without impeding the nation’s progress. Even though China’s economy has expanded quickly since reforms and the opening up, the country’s environmental degradation issue has gotten more serious.Examine China’s current strategies for economic development and their effects on environmental sustainability and economic growth.The dynamic connects between the highlighted factors (renewable consumption of energy, economic expansion, oil rent, and resources of all kinds) and the increase in greenhouse gas emissions—a proxy for environmental sustainability—is examined in this article using China as an example.The findings of an empirical study using every year data from 2018 to 2022 and the auto-regressive distribution lag limits technique point to the existence of a long-run equilibrium link between each of the variables highlighted and greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, since they have a negative impact on greenhouse gas emissions, the usage of renewable energy sources and petroleum rents contribute to ecological sustainability.In conclusion, China’s commitment to sustainability may benefit from some of the remedies this paper’s results suggest. This study demonstrates the useful use of New Structure Economy in a crucial industrial area in China, adding to the body of knowledge on sustainability in the environment and economic development.
A comparative analysis of the drivers of environmental and human development aspects in the United States of America and China

Edmund Ntom Udemba,Andrew Adewale Alola,Dongming Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04185-x

IF: 4.08

2024-01-12

Environment Development and Sustainability

Abstract:The significance of this study is the insight from comparing the largest economies in the world, i.e., the United States of America (USA) and China with the two most important aspects of sustainable development goals, the human development index (HDI) and environmental development and management. Hence, this study is significant in policy wise, by acting as a pace setting study in policy adoption by other economies that are looking up to the development patterns of the applied economies (the USA and China) in achieving their sustainable development goals. Quarterly dataset (2000Q1–2018Q4) for USA and China are utilized for this study. Relevant policy-based instruments (human development index—HDI, carbon emissions—CO 2 emission, energy efficiency, education, entrepreneurial activities and trade) and scientific approaches (symmetric-autoregressive distributed lag—ARDL and Granger causality) are used in a two-model (models for economic welfare—HDI and environment—CO 2 emission) quantitative analysis. Findings show that energy efficiency, education, entrepreneurial activities and trade all have positive and negative links with HDI and CO 2 emission, respectively, in both economies, thus pointing toward achieving sustainable development goals 2030. Findings from the Granger causality analysis support the ARDL results with feedback transmission between the instruments and the two indicators for sustainability. The only difference is the interaction that exists between HDI and carbon emission in each economy. In the case of USA, both economic welfare and environment are improving with negative link between HDI and CO 2 emission which points to inclusive sustainable development for USA. However, a positive link exists between HDI and CO 2 emission which means that economic development is maintained to the detriment of the environment. Policy insight from the result suggests that, while USA sustainable development is inclusive in nature (economy and environment), China's sustainable development is only rooted in economic development.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
Environmental Protection and Sustainability Strategies in China: Towards a Green Economy

Xiumei Guo,Dora Marinova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137372055_14

2014-01-01

Abstract:With almost 20 per cent of the global population, China is the world’s most populous economy (US Census Bureau, 2013) and the OECD (2013) anticipates that China will soon surpass the US to become the most economically powerful country. This large country already holds many other top positions but not all of them are encouraging. Since 2006, China has been the largest global greenhouse gases (GHG) emitter (PBL, 2008) and in 2008 its total ecological footprint became 2.9 billion gha -the largest for a single country (WWF, 2012). Although on a per capita basis, these statistics look better, particularly in comparison with developed economies such as the US and Australia, the impact of the Chinese economy on the globe is vast. However, China is now determined to become a significant player in tackling climate change and curbing environmental pollution. Since 2009, China has been the largest investor in new renewable energy technology (UNEP and Frankfurt School, 2013) and its current 12th Five-Year Plan is promoting a resource-efficient and environmentally friendly society.
China and The U.S.: Moving Towards Sustainable Development Goals

M. Beletskaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2023-4-26-39

2023-01-01

Abstract:This article compares the two largest economies of the world and the leading global actors – the United States and China – from the point of view of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs), adopted in 2015 by the UN General Assembly as a ‘plan for achieving a better and more sustainable future for all’. The comparison was based on data from SDG indices developed as part of a project led by Jeffrey Sachs. According to the integral index, China still lags behind the United States, but is rapidly improving its position. Based on the consideration of all 17 SDGs, it is shown that for 3 SDGs, China’s indicators are noticeably superior to the United States, for 5 SDGs, China lags behind the United States, and indicators for the remaining SDGs are close by. The analysis made it possible to conclude that progress towards the SDGs for the USA and China is interconnected. Despite all the differences between the countries under consideration, common areas of success (quality education, poverty eradication, industrialization, innovation and infrastructure) and areas of lag (reducing inequality, preserving marine ecosystems, preserving terrestrial ecosystems) are identified. It is shown that China has historically demonstrated centralized and hierarchical schemes, operating primarily on a top-down basis, which allows for the initial establishment of a holistic and balanced approach and ensuring consistency in the implementation of plans. The US is characterized by a bottom-up approach that allows for greater flexibility, initiative and responsibility at the corporate and local levels. At the same time, US policy in the area of SDGs largely depends on the political attitudes of the administration in power. The multidimensional nature of the mutual dependence of the economies of the United States and China, the direct or indirect influence of these largest economies in the world, necessitate increasing coordination of actions and correlation of policies. The complexity of the transition to sustainable development and the inability of one country to completely solve them on their own leads to the need for coordinated and complementary policies. Therefore, it is necessary to consider ways to achieve the SDGs in the broad context of cooperation between interested countries.
Multidimensional Assessment of National Environmental Sustainability Based on Footprint Family and Planetary Boundaries

FANG Kai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2014.11.022

2014-01-01

Abstract:In recent years, the concepts of footprint family and planetary boundaries have both received considerable popularity in the field of sustainability science. By reviewing the conceptual roots of these two concepts, we argue that they are complements to each other and thus should be used collectively in assessing the environmental sustainability of the planet, nations, regions, etc. Building on the complementary nature of the footprint and boundary indicators, this paper proposes, for the first time, a framework for defining and assessing environmental sustainability from a novel point of view, in which the footprints and boundaries are measured and compared in a coherent manner. The footprint family is defined as a measure of the regenerative and absorptive capacity of the Earth’s ecosystems to satisfy mankind’s demand for natural resources and waste emissions. The planetary boundaries are defined as a measure of the Earth’s maximum regenerative and absorptive capacity that allows to define a safe operating space for humanity. As such, environmental sustainability can be simply defined as a safe state in which man’s environmental footprints are kept within the related planetary boundaries;otherwise it refers to environmental unsustainability. The environmental sustainability concept is featured by completeness, selectivity, interactivity, uncertainty, scale-dependence, and the negotiability of environmental deficit. The implications of the footprint-boundary integrated framework are illustrated by reference to the assessment and ranking of 30 major nations’ environmental sustainability with regard to carbon emissions (climate change), water use and land use. The results show that, in the case of carbon emissions, 22 nations are found to be unsustainable, of which the United States of America has the highest carbon deficit per capita of 26.1 t·a-1 (in CO2 equivalent). In the case of water use, Spain, which has a water deficit per capita of 1 497.8 m3·a-1, ranks the highest among the 17 nations that are found to be unsustainable. In the case of land use, the Dutch land deficit per capita (2.3 hm2·a-1) is significantly larger than that of other 14 nations which are classified as unsustainable. Our findings suggest that the sustainability of carbon emissions is in close relation to the nation’s level of social and economic development. The contribution of developed countries to global climate change, therefore, appears to be much higher than that of developing countries. The sustainability of water and land use is often driven by the average amount of water and land resource within the border of the nation that can be appropriated by an individual citizen. This paper provides a reference for quantifying and ranking the national performance on environmental sustainability. The framework established can also be applied to other environmental issues or at sub-national scales.
China's Environment on a Metacoupled Planet

Jianguo Liu,Andres Vina,Wu Yang,Shuxin Li,Weihua Xu,Hua Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030040

2018-01-01

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Abstract:China has emerged as a global economic powerhouse after four decades of unprecedented growth. Such growth has generated many environmental challenges with enormous ecological, socioeconomic, and health consequences in China and beyond. Although the overall quality of air and water is starting to improve, both are still below national and international standards. Water shortages are widespread. Biodiversity continues to decline. China is the world's top CO2emitter, although per capita emissions are much lower than those of developed counties. On the positive side, large national conservation programs have been implemented, including the Natural Forest Conservation Program, the Grain-to-Green Program, Ecosystem Functional Conservation Areas, and Ecological Protection Redlines. More than 2,750 nature reserves have been established and a new national park system is being constructed. Some endangered and threatened species, such as the giant panda, are showing signs of recovery, and forest cover and some ecosystem services have increased. These mixed environmental outcomes result from human-nature interactions within China as well as between China and adjacent and distant countries. These include increasing rapid economic growth, resource consumption, land use change, trade and investment, and conservation and development policies. We suggest systems approaches such as nexus approaches and flow-centered governance to help China achieve ecological civilization and become an environmental leader on a metacoupled planet.
What Does Sustainability Demand? an Institutionalist Analysis with Applications to China

Rong Tan,Rumei Hu,Arild Vatn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2021.1940690

IF: 2.915

2021-01-01

Journal of Chinese Governance

Abstract:In this paper we discuss if existing political and economic institutions can ensure sustainable futures. We do so by combining a global outlook with more specifically examining the situation in China. Present institutions foster growth, they are however weak at motivating actions that keep economies within an environmentally safe and socially just space. We especially note the challenges that strong focus on growth combined with ex post environmental regulations create for natural systems with tipping-points. In this situation, there is a need to change institutions to ensure strong emphasis on long-term sustainability as opposed to short term economic surplus. Regarding political decision-making, we discuss ways to break short-termism through strengthening public deliberation as well as formalizing political responsibility for the future. Regarding economic institutions, we emphasize the need to widen the goals of firms including responsibilities for environmental qualities. The latter may demand changes in ownership structures.
A Methodology for Evaluating Quantitatively the Sustainability Status and Trends of Economic Development

Fuliu XU,Shanshan Zhao,Ying ZHANG,Junyi HAO,Wei ZHAN,Zhenyan ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2005.06.001

2005-01-01

Abstract:In conjunction with environmental performance, a definition to sustainable economic development was proposed, and a novel triangle method was designed to evaluate economic development sustainability, based on the interrelationships among economic development, resource-energy consumption and environment pollution. As a case study, the triangle method was applied to assess the sustainability status and long-term trends of China's economic development. The results showed that economic development in 2000 represented a relatively weak state of sustainability, and that most of the 31 political regions in Mainland China reflected sustainability positions ranging from weakly unsustainable to weakly sustainable. The China's economic development between 1980—1991 revealed a rather weak sustainability trend, while that from 1991—2000 demonstrated a relatively strong sustainable trend. China's unremitting efforted in environmental protection over the last two decades would be responsible for these status and trends. The triangle method, as an intuitive platform for illustrating sustainability status and trends in economic development, seemed to hold promise as an analytical management tool given its simplicity, ease of use, and flexibility.
Assessing Urban Sustainability of Chinese Megacities: 35 Years after the Economic Reform and Open-Door Policy

Lu Huang,Lijiao Yan,Jianguo Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.005

IF: 8.119

2016-01-01

Landscape and Urban Planning

Abstract:Driven by unprecedented economic development for more than three decades, China's urbanization level rose from 17.9% in 1978 to 54.8% in 2014. This breakneck speed of urbanization has resulted in myriad environmental problems and social inequities. To gauge the urban sustainability of China, our study focused on ten megacities which are socioeconomic centers of the country. We evaluated the three dimensions of sustainability using a set of sustainability indicators, including Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), Ecological Footprint (EF), Biocapacity, Environmental Performance Index (EPI), City Development Index (CDI), Human Development Index (HDI), Gini coefficient, and Urban-rural income ratio. Based on time-series data from 1978 to 2012, our study has produced the following findings: (1) The values of GPI for the ten megacities started to increase since 2006 after a relatively constant period between 1994 and 2005; (2) The pressures of economic growth on the environment (EF) increased while biocapacity decreased for the ten megacities, with smaller biocapacity deficits for western cities; (3) The overall level of human wellbeing (HDI) increased; (4) Socioeconomic inequality (Gini and urban-rural income ratio) widened, but the widening trend seemed to have ceased in recent years for most of the ten megacities; and (5) Certain aspects of urban environment and city development (EPI and CDI) improved gradually, particularly in waste treatment and infrastructure development. Our findings suggest that, to achieve overall urban sustainability, China must move away from maximizing economic development and focus on improving environmental quality of its megacities. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
How Do Industrial Ecology, Energy Efficiency, and Waste Recycling Technology (Circular Economy) Fit into China’s Plan to Protect the Environment? Up to Speed

Sasmoko Sasmoko,Muhammad Zaheer Akhtar,Haroon ur Rashid Khan,Sriyanto Sriyanto,Mohd Khata Jabor,Awais Rashid,Khalid Zaman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling7060083

2022-11-07

Recycling

Abstract:The challenges of environmental protection are especially prevalent in South and Southeast Asian nations, which adversely affects their sustainable developmental goals. During the last two decades, increased industrialization and urbanization have caused massive air pollution, particularly in the most industrialized and densely populated countries. Due to China’s fast economic expansion and development, the demand for natural resources has increased, resulting in climate change, biodiversity loss, soil degradation, and environmental risks. China’s ecological footprint has been the subject of little investigation on the premises of a circular economy. This study used a literature review methodology on the critical key factors that hinder or facilitate the transition of a linear economy towards a circular economy. Further, based on the literature review, this study used industrial ecology, energy efficiency, and waste recycling technology factors to analyze the role of the circular economy on the country’s environmental sustainability agenda for the period of 1975–2020. The results show that in the short run, the link between ecological footprints and per capita income is monotonically decreasing; however, in the long run, the relationship is U-shaped. In both the short and long run, waste recycling technology and cleaner manufacturing significantly decrease ecological footprints. Renewable energy consumption increases ecological footprints in the short run but decreases them in the long run. The management of natural resources reduces ecological footprints to support the ‘resource blessing’ hypothesis. The Granger causality corroborated the unidirectional relationship between ecological footprints, oil rents, and urbanization and ecological footprints. In addition, economic growth Granger causes industrialization and waste recycling technology while green energy Granger causes economic growth, industrialization, and recycling technology. The two-way link between economic development and urbanization exists within a nation. The variance decomposition analysis (VDA) predicts that in the future, China’s natural resources, green energy demand, and technological spillover will limit its ecological footprint through material and technology efficiency.
Exploring the Road toward Environmental Sustainability: Natural Resources, Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Yugang He,Xiang Li,Panpan Huang,Jingnan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031579

IF: 3.9

2022-01-29

Sustainability

Abstract:Despite the fact that China’s economy has grown swiftly since the reform and opening up, the problem of environmental degradation in China has become increasingly significant. Therefore, this paper uses China as an example to examine the dynamic relationship between the highlighted variables (renewable energy consumption, economic growth, oil rent, and natural resources) and greenhouse gas emissions (a proxy for environmental sustainability). Using annual data over the period 1971–2018 and employing the auto-regressive distributed lag bounds approach to perform an empirical analysis, the results suggest that there is a long-run equilibrium relationship between the highlighted variables and greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, renewable energy consumption and oil rent contribute to environmental sustainability because of their negative effects on greenhouse gas emissions. On the contrary, economic growth and natural resources hinder environmental sustainability due to their positive effects on greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, using the fully modified ordinary least squares approach and dynamic ordinary least squares approach to conduct a robustness test, the results also support the previous findings. To conclude, the findings of this paper may provide some solutions for China’s environmental sustainability.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
A triangle model for evaluating the sustainability status and trends of economic development

Fu-Liu Xu,Shan-Shan Zhao,Richard W. Dawson,Jun-Yi Hao,Ying Zhang,Shu Tao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.023

IF: 3.1

2006-01-01

Ecological Modelling

Abstract:In conjunction with ecological performance, a definition to sustainable economic development was proposed, and a novel triangle method was designed to evaluate economic development sustainability, based on the interrelationships among economic development, resource–energy consumption, and environment pollution. As a case study, the triangle method was applied to assess the sustainability status and long-term trends of China's economic development. The results show that economic development in 2000 represents a relatively weak state of sustainability, and that most of the 31 political regions in Mainland China reflect sustainability positions ranging from weakly unsustainable to weakly sustainable. The China's economic development between 1980 and 1991 reveals a rather weak sustainability trend, while that from 1991 to 2000 demonstrates a relatively strong sustainable trend. China's unremitting efforts in environmental protection over the last two decades would be responsible for these status and trends. The triangle method, as an intuitive platform for illustrating sustainability status and trends in economic development, seems to hold promise as an analytical management tool given its simplicity, ease of use, and flexibility.
Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Environmental Sustainability in China

Michinori Uwasu,Keishiro Hara,Masashi Kuroda,Ji Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135322

IF: 3.9

2024-06-23

Sustainability

Abstract:Environmental sustainability is crucial to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We can gain an overview of a region's or country's dynamics by quantifying and analyzing its patterns over time and space. It can then be used to develop more sustainable policies. This study created a database of indices covering China's environment, economy, and resource domains. Using an improved Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) approach, we assessed sustainability and its spatiotemporal dynamics in 31 Chinese provinces between 2000 and 2017. Our findings suggest that provinces with high levels of socioeconomic development tend to have higher environmental scores, especially after experiencing severe environmental issues. Some underdeveloped provinces achieved high scores due to their relatively low environmental pressure and high resource efficiency. However, most underdeveloped provinces had high environmental pressure and low resource efficiency, leading to low environmental sustainability. We also discovered that sustainability scores improved between 2000 and 2017, mainly due to socioeconomic advancements. Yet, some environmental issues, such as air pollution, worsened during the latter part. Therefore, we confirmed an inverted U-curve relationship between environmental, resource, and socioeconomic components. Clustering analysis based on provincial economic and demographic characteristics also revealed different chronological patterns of environmental scores across the clusters. Additionally, we detected the transfer of pollution from developed to less-developed regions during the early 2000s.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Using System Dynamics to Analyse Key Factors Influencing China's Energy-Related CO2 Emissions and Emission Reduction Scenarios

Honghua Yang,Xu Li,Linwei Ma,Zheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128811

IF: 11.1

2021-01-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:Considering the complexity and dynamicity of national energy-related CO2 emissions, it is necessary to analyse the influencing factors and evaluate the possible impact of relevant emission reduction policies before formulating them. Based on the system dynamics (SD) method, this study proposed a research framework and established a multi-level SD model to comprehensively analyse national energy-related carbon emissions, considering the relationship between factors of society, economic, energy and carbon emissions. The method was applied to the case of China. Firstly, it simulated China's historical emissions and predicted future baseline from 2005 to 2050. Then, based on the sensitivity analysis, the key influencing factors were discerned. Finally, by setting scenarios and introducing causal chains, the model was used to test the effectiveness of different emission reduction measures. The results show that GDP, energy structure and industrial structure have significant impact on energy-related CO2 emissions. The impact of the population is limited, while that of industrial energy intensity varies in different periods. Without carbon constraints, China's CO2 emissions will peak by 2043 with the value of 15.2 Gt/year. Enhancing technological innovation in energy efficiency improvement and non-fossil energy is a better choice to reduce carbon emissions at current stage. An integrated measure combining technological innovation, infrastructure construction, resident behaviour improvement and adjustment of industrial structure can effectively advance the carbon peak to 2028, and reduce carbon intensity by 94% by 2050 compared to 2005, which will achieve China's national determined contribution goals. Such information will be important for China's future energy low-carbon transition and will provide suggestions for policy-making.
Safeguarding China's long-term sustainability against systemic disruptors

Ke Li,Lei Gao,Zhaoxia Guo,Yucheng Dong,Enayat A. Moallemi,Gang Kou,Meiqian Chen,Wenhao Lin,Qi Liu,Michael Obersteiner,Matteo Pedercini,Brett A. Bryan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49725-9

IF: 16.6

2024-06-25

Nature Communications

Abstract:China's long-term sustainability faces socioeconomic and environmental uncertainties. We identify five key systemic risk drivers, called disruptors , which could push China into a polycrisis: pandemic disease, ageing and shrinking population, deglobalization, climate change, and biodiversity loss. Using an integrated simulation model, we quantify the effects of these disruptors on the country's long-term sustainability framed by 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Here we show that ageing and shrinking population, and climate change would be the two most influential disruptors on China's long-term sustainability. The compound effects of all disruptors could result in up to 2.1 and 7.0 points decline in the China's SDG score by 2030 and 2050, compared to the baseline with no disruptors and no additional sustainability policies. However, an integrated policy portfolio involving investment in education, healthcare, energy transition, water-use efficiency, ecological conservation and restoration could promote resilience against the compound effects and significantly improve China's long-term sustainability.

multidisciplinary sciences
ImPACTS Identity of Sustainability Assessment

XU Zhongmin,CHENG Guodong,QIU GuoYu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2005.02.003

2005-01-01

Abstract:Based on formal ImPACT identity which describes environmental impacts (Im) as a function of population (P), affluence (A), intensity use (C) and efficiency (T), a new "ImPACTS" identity as a framework for sustainability science was produced, where S denote the level of social resources, m is assigned to management and I is changed from formal environmental impacts to the trade-off between environmental impacts and development. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of ImPACTS by performing an empirical analysis of our integrated impacts assessment on the Earth by using existing data of Ecological footprint and Human development index. In an attempt to analyse the relationship between ecological footprint and social development using existing data, developed countries showed a great advantage over developing countries in terms of energy resource use efficiency due to their social and technological development. Global warming shows that humanity has gone beyond the sustainable scale of the Earth. We thus suggest that every country should increase its global share of ecological footprints within the sustainable scale of the Earth, rather than simply decrease its ecological footprints. The reason why current analysis contradicts the conventional ecological footprint analysis is that ecological footprint's concept simply considers the land embodied in goods and attributes a high ecological footprint value to high-income countries, and effects of trade on social development and in turn on the environment have not been considered. The ecological footprint analysis ignores the effects of development mainly in the stock of social resources on environment. The critical point in sustainable development is to harmonize environment and development. Examples from water shortage in northern China and China's food security and world energy consumption show that managing and mobilizing social resources should be considered as an alternative to mitigating human impacts on the environment and adapting to these impacts.
Leading role of natural resources, eco-efficiency assessment, and energy transition in environmental sustainability: A depth of digital transformation

Bin Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105145

IF: 8.222

2024-06-10

Resources Policy

Abstract:There has been a worldwide upsurge in environmental movements. The planet's ecosystem has degraded significantly over the years. The disturbing effects of environmental deterioration on Earth's physical geography cause concern among those concerned about the planet's future. While previous research has looked at various ecological elements, recent attention has turned to digital change and the need to make the most of it. Eco-efficiency is a critical component in reducing carbon output (CO2). Reaching carbon neutrality goals, getting carbon peaking, and achieving high-quality economic growth, digital transformation, and eco-efficiency are intense endeavors. A panel data set spanning G-15 economies from 1995 to 2022, this article examines the effects of digital transformation, eco-efficiency, and the food supply chain on carbon emissions. The unit root test established the stationarity of all indicators at the initial difference. In addition to Pedroni and Kao cointegration methods, the panel study uses ADF, DF-GLS, and PP unit root test, as well as dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) and fully FMOLS stands for panel adjusted regular least square. Approaches for robustness: the present research additionally uses panel quantile regression to examine the effect of factors. In order to promote environmental sustainability and minimize CO2 emissions, the findings highlighted the need for eco-efficiency, digital transformation, the food supply chain, and government policy. On the other hand, natural resource exploitation and energy transition worsen environmental quality and raise CO2 emissions in Great economies. We use the DH panel causality test to assess the factors' correlation further. Furthermore, carbon emissions (CO2) are affected in one way by changes in the energy sector and the food supply chain and in another by changes in eco-efficiency, digital transformation, and government policy. Environmental deterioration has many causes, and this study's results may help shed light on those reasons while suggesting solutions.

environmental studies
Dynamics among economic growth, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in IEA countries: the role of industry value-added

Xiaotian Yang,Irfan Khan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16000-z

IF: 5.8

2021-08-17

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:As an indicator of environmental degradation, the ecological footprint has seen a terrific focus in the literature. We explore the dynamics among economic growth, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in the presence of population growth and industry value-added in the thirty International Energy Agency (IEA) member countries. We apply advanced econometric modeling for empirical analysis over the period 1992 to 2016. This study’s short-run results suggest that capital formation and biocapacity increase ecological footprint in the short run. The findings of long-run estimates demonstrate that industrial value-added and capital formation improve environmental sustainability. However, economic growth, urbanization, biocapacity, and population growth deteriorate environmental sustainability in the long run. Policymakers in the IEA countries are encouraged to establish policies that promote a sustained lifestyle, ecological awareness, clean technological innovations, efficient production and consumption measures, and enlarge cities to limit the adverse effects of urbanization on environmental sustainability. Finally, study limitations and future research directions are discussed.

environmental sciences
Tracking the roadmaps to sustainability: what do the symmetric effects of eco-digitalization, green technology, green finance, and renewable energy portend for China?

Feng Han,Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim,Usama Al-Mulali,Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04289-4

IF: 4.08

2023-12-20

Environment Development and Sustainability

Abstract:The post-COP26 era provides policy directions for economies to track the ways of achieving sustainable environment as a lasting solution to the ravaging impacts of global warming. The call for global sustainability heightens the criticality of digital economy which is recently evolving in environmental empirics. This study provides the first empirical evidence advancing the symmetric effects of eco-digitalization, green technology, green finance, and renewable energy on environmental sustainability in China within the novel STIRPAT model. The study explores the ARDL model to evaluate the stated hypotheses based on quarterly data from 1995Q1 to 2019Q4. The preliminary analyses reveal the vulnerability of the Chinese environment to surging greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Besides, the structural break unit root anchored on Zivot–Andrew reveals prominent breakpoint years. The essential roles of urbanization and affluence are empirically investigated. Robustness checks on the long-run impacts are conducted based on FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR coupled with the causality analysis examined based on Toda–Yamamoto estimator. The findings uncover that eco-digitalization, green technology, green finance, and renewable energy promote environmental sustainability in China by mitigating CO 2 emissions and ecological footprint. Conversely, urbanization and affluence escalate both pollutants. Further, causalities running from bidirectional to unidirectional nexuses among the variables are well documented. Policy insights that drive the paths to sustainability in China are suggested based on the findings.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
How Do Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Political Stability Affect Environmental Sustainability in the United States? Insights from a Modified Ecological Footprint Model

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01953-6

IF: 1.815

2024-04-20

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Abstract:In the last century, global warming and environmental pollution issues have reached the levels that threaten humanity. Competition on economic growth is considered one of the primary causes of environmental pollution. It has increased the significance of sustainable development and renewable energy consumption. Within the scope of sustainable development, the countries with large economies bear a greater responsibility to reduce environmental pollution. This study aims to investigate the effect of economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and political stability on environmental degradation in the United States (US) for the period 1984–2017. A comprehensive econometric analysis is conducted by using the Fourier Autoregressive Distributed Lag (FARDL) test in this study. The results of the cointegration tests indicate that economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and political stability are cointegrated with the ecological footprint pressure index representing the environmental degradation. The FARDL test results reveal that economic growth increases environmental degradation, whereas renewable energy consumption and political stability mitigate environmental degradation in both the short- and long-run. This study provides policy recommendations aiming to increase renewable energy consumption and political stability within the context of sustainable development.

economics

Testing dogs for immunity against Canine Parvovirus , Canine Distemper Virus and Infectious Canine Hepatitis

Sustainable Economic Development in China: Balancing Growth and Environmental Concerns

A comparative analysis of the drivers of environmental and human development aspects in the United States of America and China

Environmental Protection and Sustainability Strategies in China: Towards a Green Economy

China and The U.S.: Moving Towards Sustainable Development Goals

Multidimensional Assessment of National Environmental Sustainability Based on Footprint Family and Planetary Boundaries

China's Environment on a Metacoupled Planet

What Does Sustainability Demand? an Institutionalist Analysis with Applications to China

A Methodology for Evaluating Quantitatively the Sustainability Status and Trends of Economic Development

Assessing Urban Sustainability of Chinese Megacities: 35 Years after the Economic Reform and Open-Door Policy

How Do Industrial Ecology, Energy Efficiency, and Waste Recycling Technology (Circular Economy) Fit into China’s Plan to Protect the Environment? Up to Speed

Exploring the Road toward Environmental Sustainability: Natural Resources, Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

A triangle model for evaluating the sustainability status and trends of economic development

Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Environmental Sustainability in China

Using System Dynamics to Analyse Key Factors Influencing China's Energy-Related CO2 Emissions and Emission Reduction Scenarios

Safeguarding China's long-term sustainability against systemic disruptors

ImPACTS Identity of Sustainability Assessment

Leading role of natural resources, eco-efficiency assessment, and energy transition in environmental sustainability: A depth of digital transformation

Dynamics among economic growth, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in IEA countries: the role of industry value-added

Tracking the roadmaps to sustainability: what do the symmetric effects of eco-digitalization, green technology, green finance, and renewable energy portend for China?

How Do Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Political Stability Affect Environmental Sustainability in the United States? Insights from a Modified Ecological Footprint Model