Oleic acid abomasal infusion limits lipolysis and improves insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue from periparturient dairy cows

Ursula Abou-Rjeileh,JoséM Dos Santos Neto,Miguel Chirivi,Nial O'Boyle,David Salcedo,Crystal Prom,Juliana Laguna,Jair Parales-Giron,Adam L Lock,G Andres Contreras
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22402
Abstract:Excessive adipose tissue (AT) lipolysis around parturition in dairy cows is associated with impaired AT insulin sensitivity and increased incidence of metabolic diseases. Supplementing cows with oleic acid (OA) reduces circulating biomarkers of lipolysis and improves energy balance. Nevertheless, it is unclear if OA alters lipid trafficking in AT. In the liver and skeletal muscle, OA improves mitochondrial function and promotes lipid droplet formation by activating perilipin 5 (PLIN5) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα). However, it is unknown if this mechanism occurs in AT. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of OA on AT lipolysis, systemic and AT insulin sensitivity, and AT mitochondrial function in periparturient dairy cows. Twelve rumen-cannulated Holstein cows were infused abomasally following parturition with ethanol (CON) or OA (60 g/d) for 14 d. Subcutaneous AT samples were collected at 11 ± 3.6 d before calving (-12 d), and 6 ± 1.0 d (7 d) and 13 ± 1.4 d (14 d) after parturition. An intravenous glucose tolerance test was performed on d 14. Adipocyte morphometry was performed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained AT sections. The antilipolytic effect of insulin (1 μg/L) was evaluated using an ex vivo explant culture following lipolysis stimulation. PLIN5 and PPARα transcription and translation were determined by real-time quantitative PCR and capillary electrophoresis, respectively. RNA sequencing was used to evaluate the transcriptomic profile of mitochondrial gene networks. In CON cows, postpartum lipolysis increased the percentage of smaller (<3,000 µm2) adipocytes at 14 d compared with -12 d. However, OA limited adipocyte size reduction at 14 d. Likewise, OA decreased lipolysis plasma markers nonesterified free fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate at 5 and 7 d. Over the 14-d period, compared with CON, OA increased the concentration of plasma insulin and decreased plasma glucose. During the glucose tolerance test, OA decreased circulating glucose concentration (at 10, 20, 30, 40 min) and the glucose clearance rate. Moreover, OA increased insulin at 10 and 20 min and tended to increase it at 30 min. Following lipolysis stimulation, OA improved the antilipolytic effect of insulin in the AT at 14 d. PLIN5 and PPARA gene expression decreased postpartum regardless of treatment. However, OA increased PLIN5 protein expression at 14 d and increased PPARA at 7 and 14 d. Immunohistochemical analysis of AT and RNA sequencing data showed that OA increased the number of mitochondria and improved mitochondrial function. However, OA had no effect on production and digestibility. Our results demonstrate that OA limits AT lipolysis, improves systemic and AT insulin sensitivity, and is associated with markers of mitochondrial function supporting a shift to lipogenesis in AT of periparturient dairy cows.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?