Lipolysis inhibition as a treatment of clinical ketosis in dairy cows: Effects on adipose tissue metabolic and immune responses

Miguel Chirivi,Daniela Cortes,C Javier Rendon,G Andres Contreras
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23998
Abstract:Dairy cows with clinical ketosis (CK) exhibit excessive adipose tissue (AT) lipolysis and systemic inflammation. Lipolysis in cows can be induced by the canonical (hormonally induced) and inflammatory lipolytic pathways. Currently, the most common treatment for CK is oral propylene glycol (PG); however, PG does not reduce lipolysis or inflammation. Niacin (NIA) can reduce the activation of canonical lipolysis, whereas cyclooxygenase inhibitors such as flunixin meglumine (FM) can limit inflammation and inhibit the inflammatory lipolytic pathway. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of including NIA and FM in the standard PG treatment for postpartum CK on AT function. Multiparous Jersey cows (n = 18; 7.1 ± 3.8 DIM) were selected from a commercial dairy. Inclusion criteria were CK symptoms (lethargy, depressed appetite, and drop in milk yield) and high blood levels of BHB (≥1.2 mmol/L). Cows with CK were randomly assigned to one of 3 treatments: (1) PG: 310 g administered orally once per day for 5 d, (2) PG+NIA: 24 g administered orally once per day for 3 d, and (3) PG+NIA+FM: 1.1 mg/kg administered IV once per day for 3 d. Healthy control cows (HC; n = 6) matched by lactation and DIM (±2 d) were sampled. Subcutaneous AT explants were collected at d 0 and d 7 relative to enrollment. To assess AT insulin sensitivity, explants were treated with insulin (1 µL/L) during lipolysis stimulation with a β-adrenergic receptor agonist (isoproterenol, 1 µM). Lipolysis was quantified by glycerol release in the media. Lipid mobilization and inflammatory gene networks were evaluated using quantitative PCR. Protein biomarkers of lipolysis, insulin signaling, and AT inflammation, including hormone-sensitive lipase, protein kinase B (Akt), and ERK1/2, were quantified by capillary immunoassays. Flow cytometry of AT cellular components was used to characterize macrophage inflammatory phenotypes. Statistical significance was determined by a nonparametric t-test when 2 groups (HC vs. CK) were analyzed and an ANOVA test with Tukey adjustment when 3 treatment groups (PG vs. PG+NIA vs. PG+NIA+FM) were evaluated. At d 0, AT from CK cows showed higher mRNA expression of lipolytic enzymes ABHD5, LIPE, and LPL, as well as increased phosphorylation of hormone-sensitive lipase compared with HC. At d 0, insulin reduced lipolysis by 41% ± 8% in AT from HC, but CK cows were unresponsive (-2.9 ± 4%). Adipose tissue from CK cows exhibited reduced Akt phosphorylation compared with HC. Cows with CK had increased AT expression of inflammatory gene markers, including CCL2, IL8, IL10, TLR4, and TNF, along with ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Adipose tissue from CK cows showed increased macrophage infiltration compared with HC. By d 7, AT from PG+NIA+FM cows had a more robust response to insulin, as evidenced by reduced glycerol release (36.5% ± 8% compared with PG at 26.9% ± 7% and PG+NIA at 7.4% ± 8%) and enhanced phosphorylation of Akt. By d 7, PG+NIA+FM cows presented lower inflammatory markers, including ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and reduced macrophage infiltration, compared with PG and PG+NIA. These data suggest that including NIA and FM in CK treatment improves AT insulin sensitivity and reduces AT inflammation and macrophage infiltration.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?