[Metabolic heterogeneity of hemoglobin].

G. Schapira,J. Kruh,J. Dreyfus

Biological Sciences

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Managing Perioperative Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Perspectives from a Sports Medicine Surgeon

Ioanna K Bolia,Aryan Haratian,Jennifer A Bell,Laith K Hasan,Nima Saboori,Ryan Palmer,Frank A Petrigliano,Alexander E Weber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJSM.S266227

2022-01-20

Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Ioanna K Bolia, Aryan Haratian, Jennifer A Bell, Laith K Hasan, Nima Saboori, Ryan Palmer, Frank A Petrigliano, Alexander E Weber USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA Correspondence: Alexander E Weber USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, 1520 San Pablo Street, Suite 2000, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA Email Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR) are a relatively common procedure in orthopedic sports medicine with an estimated 130,000 arthroscopic operations performed annually. Most procedures are carried out on an outpatient basis, and though success rates of ACLR are as high as 95%, pain remains the most common postoperative complication delaying patient discharge, and thereby increasing the costs associated with patient care. Despite the success and relative frequency of ACLR surgery, optimal and widely accepted strategies and regimens for controlling perioperative pain are not well established. In recent years, the paradigm of pain control has shifted from exclusively utilizing opiates and opioid medications in the acute postoperative period to employing other agents and techniques including nerve blocks, intra-articular and periarticular injections of local anesthetic agents, NSAIDs, and less commonly, ketamine, tranexamic acid (TXA), sedatives, gabapentin, and corticosteroids. More often, these agents are now used in combination and in synergy with one another as part of a multimodal approach to pain management in ACLR, with the goal of reducing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and the incidence of delayed hospital discharge. The purpose of this review is to consolidate current literature on various agents involved in the management of postoperative pain following ACLR, including the role of classically used opiate and opioid medications, as well as to describe other drugs currently utilized in practice either individually or in conjunction with other agents as part of a multimodal regimen in pain management in ACLR. Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, ACL, postoperative pain, patient outcomes, multimodal pain management Anterior cruciate ligament tears are one of the most common sports injuries in the United States. 1 Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the gold standard in treatment, with an estimated 130,000 arthroscopic procedures performed annually. 2 Most procedures are carried out on an outpatient basis, and though success rates of ACLR are as high as 95%, pain remains the most common postoperative complication delaying patient discharge, and thereby increasing the costs associated with patient care. 2,3 Compared across other orthopedic sports medicine procedures including rotator cuff repair, meniscal debridement, and labral repair, ACLR has subjectively been ranked as the most painful. 4 Despite the success and relative frequency of ACLR surgery, optimal and widely accepted strategies and regimens for controlling perioperative pain are not well established. 5 Since successful management of postoperative pain is often correlated with improved patient outcomes, developing an effective strategy to provide adequate pain relief is of importance to orthopedic surgeons. 6 Regimens in postoperative pain management after ACLR vary significantly and range from agents used either individually or given in conjunction with other medications. Common agents in current practice include narcotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), and anesthetic agents such as lidocaine or bupivacaine that have nerve blocking and regional anesthetic capabilities. Less commonly used agents include ketamine, tranexamic acid (TXA), sedatives, gabapentinoids, and corticosteroids. 7 While historically, opiates and opioids were the gold standard in postoperative pain control, complications associated with prolonged narcotic use have shifted the paradigm of pain management in orthopedic practice towards a greater focus on optimizing multimodal pain control regimens to reduce the role of narcotics. 8–10 The purpose of this review is to consolidate current literature on various agents involved in the management of postoperative pain following ACLR, including the role of classically used opiate and opioid medications, as well as to describe other drugs currently utilized in practice either individually or in conjunction with other agents as part of a multimodal regimen in pain management after ACLR. Opiates and their synthetic analogs, opioids, were among the most popular pain control modalities used in the acute postoperative period for a variety of orthopedic procedures. Medications in this class are thought to act on the central nervous system as agonists of the Mu receptor. While opioids -Abstract Truncated-
Additional femoral nerve block analgesia does not reduce the chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Yuan-Yuan Yao,Qing-He Zhou,Li-Na Yu,Min Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014991

IF: 1.6

2019-01-01

Medicine

Abstract:Femoral nerve block analgesia was deemed to the gold standard for acute pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). But effect on chronic pain management is not investigated fully. We conducted a retrospective study to explore the effect of single-injection femoral nerve block on postsurgical chronic pain. All medical records of patients undertaking TKA between January, 2013 and June, 2014 were reviewed via the Docare anesthesia database. Patients who administrated with the self-controlled intravenous analgesia were assigned to group P. Patients who received a single-injection femoral never block combined with patient self-controlled intravenous analgesia were assigned to group N+P. The visual analog scale (VAS) score before surgery, the first postoperative day (POD 1), POD 2, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery were extracted from medical records. Pain score was compared over these 2 groups to investigate treatment outcomes. In all, 470 patients met the selection criteria for group P and 266 patients met the selection criteria for group N+P. Compared with group P, the VAS score decreased significantly in group N+P at POD 1 (P<.001), and the same was observed at POD 2 (P<.001); the moderate to severe pain incidence rate decreased significantly in group N+P at POD 1 (P<.01) and POD 2 (motion, P<.001). The rescued anesthesia rate reduced significantly in group N+P in POD 1 (P=.001), whereas no difference was found in POD 2 (P=.864). No difference was found at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery (all P>.05). The single-injection femoral nerve block could relieve the acute postsurgical pain in a short period of time. But no evidence was found that it could reduce the chronic pain between 3 and 12 months after TKA.
INTRA-ARTICULAR MORPHINE AND ROPIVACAINE INJECTION PROVIDES EFFICACIOUS ANALGESIA COMPARED TO FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK IN THE FIRST 24 HOURS POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH BTB IN AN ADOLESCENT COHORT

Brendon C. Mitchell,Matthew Y. Siow,Andrew T. Pennock,Eric W. Edmonds,Tracey P. Bastrom,Henry G. Chambers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967121s00023

IF: 2.6

2021-07-01

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Background: Opioid consumption and patient satisfaction are influenced by a surgeon’s pain management protocol and the use of adjunctive pain mediators. Two commonly utilized adjunctive pain modifiers for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction include femoral nerve blockade and intra-articular injection; however, debate remains as to the most efficacious methodology. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesize that intra-articular injection with ropivacaine and morphine is as efficacious as a femoral nerve block injection of ropivacaine, dexamethasone, and dexmedetomidine for post-operative pain management in the first 24 hours after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) ACL reconstruction. Methods: Charts were retrospectively reviewed for a single pediatric orthopedic surgeon performing BTB ACL reconstructions from 2013-2019. One hundred sixteen patients were identified, of whom 58 received intra-articular injection and 58 received single shot femoral nerve block. All patients were admitted for 24 hours. Pain scores were assessed every 4 hours. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed were tabulated for each patient. Results: Opioid use was 24.3 MMEs in patients treated with intra-articular injection vs 28.5MMEs in those with peripheral block (p=0.108). Consumption of MMEs was greater in the intra-articular group in the 0-4 hours period (7.1 MMEs vs. 4.6 MMEs, p=0.008). There was significantly less MME consumption in patients receiving intra-articular injection compared with peripheral block at 16-20 and 20-24 hours (3.2 MMEs vs. 5.6 MMEs, p=0.01; 3.8 MMEs vs. 6.5 MMEs, p<0.001 respectively). Mean pain scores were not significantly different over the 24-hour period (peripheral block=2.7, intra-articular injection=3.0, p=0.19). Conclusion: Moving away from the use of peripheral nerve block as an analgesic modality may be challenging given the multidisciplinary role of pain management in these patients. However, as Ramlogan et al. succinctly noted in their recent editorial “Anterior cruciate ligament repair and peripheral nerve blocks: time to change our practice?” in the British Journal of Anesthesia, both orthopedic and anesthesia colleagues alike are beginning to recognize that it is a change that may benefit our patients. Our study strengthens this argument and shows that there is no significant difference in MME consumption between the femoral nerve block and intra-articular injection groups in the first 24 hours post-operatively. While peripheral block is associated with lower opioid consumption in the first 4 hours after surgery, patients receiving intra-articular block require less opioids 16-24 hours post-operatively. Given these findings, we propose that intra-articular injection is a viable alternative for analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction. [Table: see text][Figure: see text]

orthopedics,sport sciences
Postoperative Multimodal Approach to Pain Control in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft Surgery: A Single-Center Series

Alexey Cheykin,Evgeniy Nikolaevich Goncharov,Oleg Aleksandrovich Koval,Nikolay Goncharov,Eduard Bezuglov,Aleksandr Vetoshkin,Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion Ramirez,Nicola Montemurro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030052

2024-08-15

Surgeries

Abstract:Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are prevalent and represent a significant socioeconomic burden, as ACL injuries account for nearly 60% of all knees joint traumas. The purpose of this study is to emphasize the role of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and the challenges in postoperative pain management. Methods: This study involved 90 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, categorized into three groups receiving different pain management protocols. The focus was on evaluating the efficacy of multimodal analgesia using lidocaine and magnesium sulfate. The main outcome was pain assessment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Patients receiving fentanyl, lidocaine, and magnesium sulfate (FLM) reported significantly lower pain scores in the postoperative period. Minimal use of additional opioids was observed, suggesting effective pain management with the multimodal analgesia regimen. Conclusions: The study showed that multimodal analgesia, including FLM, effectively manages postoperative pain following ACL reconstruction. This study showed significantly lower pain scores with FLM, highlighting its potential in early postoperative pain relief. Future research should consider long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive evaluations of multimodal analgesia’s impact.
Editorial Commentary: Multiple Factors, Including Multimodal Anesthesia, Can Reduce Opioid Requirements After Rotator Cuff Repair

Justin J Greiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.017

2024-09-19

Abstract:Rotator cuff repair often results in significant pain and discomfort early after surgery, whereas longer-term outcomes generally result in substantial improvement. Efforts to decrease pain levels and opioid use after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have led to the expansion of multimodal analgesia techniques. An interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB)-"plus" technique adds a subacromial space injection and "blind" (i.e., without imaging) suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks. Recent research has shown that the ISBPB-plus technique results in less opioid consumption at 48 hours compared with an isolated ISBPB and that both techniques show similar patient satisfaction and postoperative pain scores. Although the optimal multimodal strategy has yet to be determined for specific surgical treatments, decreased opioid consumption is a high priority. Multiple patient factors also require consideration, including severity of pathology, management of depression, preoperative patient education, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Moreover, surgical technique modifications, cryotherapy, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation may provide pain-reduction benefits.
Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Adductor Canal Block for Managing Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Shaheer Nadeem,Reza Ojaghi,Partha Patel,Eric Locke,Andrew McGuire,Michael A. Pickell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241292029

IF: 2.6

2024-11-17

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2024. Background:Adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration analgesia (LIA) are frequently used to manage pain in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).Purpose:To compare the difference in pain scores and opioid consumption between ACB and LIA for ancillary pain management in patients after ACLR.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies that compared pain scores at 2, 6, 12, or 24 hours after ACLR or provided information on 24-hour opioid consumption were included. Of 240 publications initially screened by abstract and title, 4 studies were included, and data related to participant characteristics, anesthetic technique, and pain-related outcomes were extracted. The standardized mean difference (MD) in pain scores and morphine milligram equivalents consumed in 24 hours was compared using a random-effects model.Results:In all studies, ropivacaine was the primary anesthetic used for LIA and ACB, with 1 study also employing bupivacaine as an alternative. The difference in pain scores between LIA and ACB was not significant at 2 hours (MD, 0.04 [95% CI, –0.22 to 0.29]; P = .79), 6 hours (MD, 0.16 [95% CI, –0.20 to 0.52]; P = .39), 12 hours (MD, 0.54 [95% CI, –0.49 to 1.56]; P = .31), or 24 hours (MD, 0.12 [95% CI, –0.10 to 0.34]; P = .28). The difference in morphine milligram equivalents was also not statistically significant (MD, –0.07 [95% CI, –0.25 to 0.11]; P = .68).Conclusion:From this review, the authors suggest considering LIA over ACB because of its potential to offer comparable pain relief and opioid consumption while being less time intensive. However, the study results should be interpreted with caution, given the limited number of studies included.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Postoperative Pain Control After ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia

Sermsak Sumanont,Khananut Jaruwanneechai,Aumjit Wittayapairoj,Punyawat Apiwatanakul,Artit Boonrod

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241292604

IF: 2.6

2024-11-23

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2024. Background:Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated.Purpose:To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.Results:A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; P = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; P = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups.Conclusion:Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction.Registration:TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).

orthopedics,sport sciences
Lower Opioid Prescription Quantity Does Not Negatively Impact Pain Control or Patient Satisfaction After ACL Reconstruction

William L. Johns,Adeeb Jacob Hanna,Henson Destine,John Hayden Sonnier,Christopher Dodson,Bradford Tucker,Matthew Pepe,Kevin B. Freedman,Fotios Tjoumakaris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.23.00657

2024-01-29

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Abstract:Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different quantities of prescribed opioid tablets on patient opioid utilization, postoperative pain and function, and satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: This was a prospective, randomized trial enrolling patients undergoing primary ACLR. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 prescription groups: 15, 25, or 35 tablets containing 5-mg oxycodone. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) pain and medication logs, opioid medication satisfaction surveys, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires postoperatively. Results: Among the 180 patients included in the analysis, there was no significant difference in VAS pain scores (p > 0.05), IKDC scores (p > 0.05), morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (p = 0.510) consumed, or patient satisfaction with regard to pain control (p = 0.376) between treatment groups. Seventy-two percent of opioids were consumed in the first 3 days postoperatively, and 83% of patients in the 15-tablet cohort felt that they received the “right amount” of or even “too many” opioids. Conclusions: The prescription of 15 opioid tablets resulted in equivalent pain control, patient satisfaction, and short-term functional outcomes as prescriptions of 25 or 35 opioid tablets after ACLR. Lower prescription quantities of opioid medication may provide equivalent postoperative pain and help to minimize the number of unused opioid doses at risk for possible diversion after ACLR. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

surgery,orthopedics
The formation of fast-sedimenting turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA: structural rearrangement inside the capsid.

C. Pleij,H. G. Eecen,L. Bosch,M. Mandel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(77)90258-6

IF: 3.513

1977-02-01

Virology

Abstract:
Femoral Nerve Block and Local Instillation Analgesia Associated With More Reliable Efficacy in Regional Anesthesia Interventions Within 24 Hours Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Network Meta-analysis

Hongzhi Liu,Xinqiu Song,Chuiqing Li,Yan Li,Wanshou Guo,Hongmei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.014

2023-05-01

Abstract:PURPOSE: To assess the relative effectiveness of different regional anesthetic techniques (peripheral nerve blocks, local instillation analgesia, including intra-articular, subcutaneous, and periarticular infiltration) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to December 31, 2020. The search was supplemented by manual review of relevant reference lists. Randomized controlled trials of participants after ACLR that compared regional anesthesia interventions were selected. The 2 coprimary outcomes were (1) rest pain scores and (2) cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption on day 1 (24 hours) post-ACLR. Data were pooled using a Bayesian framework.RESULTS: Of 759 records identified, 46 trials were eligible, evaluating 9 interventions in 3,171 patients. Local instillation analgesia (LIA), including intra-articular, subcutaneous, and periarticular infiltration, had significant improvement in pain relief as compared with placebo (-0.91; 95% CrI -1.45 to -0.37). Femoral nerve block (FNB) also showed significant effects in relieving pain as compared with placebo (-0.70; 95% 95% credible interval [CrI] -1.28 to -0.12). Compared with placebo, a significant reduction in opioid consumption was found in LIA (mean difference -13.29 mg; 95% CrI -21.77 to -4.91) and FNB (mean difference -13.97 mg; 95% CrI -24.71 to -3.04). Femoral and sciatic nerve block showed the greatest ranking for pain relief and opioid consumption without significant evidence (P > .05) to support superiority in comparison with placebo, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis shows that FNB and LIA can significantly diminish postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption following ACLR compared with placebo in the setting of regional anesthesia, and femoral and sciatic nerve block may be the number 1 top-ranked analgesic technique despite high uncertainty.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, Systematic review of Level I studies.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Deletion of the H19 transcription unit reveals the existence of a putative imprinting control element.

M. Ripoche,C. Kress,oise Poirier,L. Dandolo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/GAD.11.12.1596

IF: 12.89

1997-06-15

Genes & Development

Abstract:The distal region of mouse chromosome 7 contains a cluster of imprinted genes that includes H19 and Igf2 (insulin-like growth factor 2). H19 is expressed as an untranslated RNA found at high levels in endodermal and mesodermal embryonic tissues. This gene is imprinted and exclusively expressed from the allele of maternal origin. The Igf2 gene shows a similar pattern of expression but is expressed from the paternal allele. We have generated a targeted deletion of the H19 transcription unit by insertion of a neo replacement cassette. The homozygous mutant animals are viable and fertile and display an overgrowth phenotype of 8% compared with wild-type littermates. This is associated with the disruption of Igf2 imprinting and the consequent biallelic expression of this gene. A striking feature of the recombinant H19 allele is the occurrence of a parental imprint set on the neo replacement cassette. Therefore imprinting of the H19 locus is independent of the H19 gene itself. Taken together with the results of a larger H19 mutation described previously, this indicates that an imprinting control element is located within the region 10 kb upstream of H19.
Posterior capsule injection of local anesthetic for post-operative pain control after ACL reconstruction: a prospective, randomized trial

Robert A. Keller,Michael E. Birns,Adam C. Cady,Orr Limpisvasti,Michael B. Banffy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5111-3

2018-08-27

Abstract:PURPOSE: Alternative modalities to optimize pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are continually being explored. The purpose of this study was to compare femoral nerve block (FNB) only vs FNB with posterior capsule injection (PCI) of the knee for pain control in patients undergoing ACLR.METHODS: Patients undergoing primary ACLR were randomized to receive either FNB only or FNB with PCI. Following surgery, patient's pain was evaluated in the postoperative care unit (PACU) and at home for 4 days. Pain levels were measured via visual analog scale (VAS) and calculating opioid consumption. Outcomes of interest included postoperative pain levels and opioid consumption.RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were evaluated, with 21 patients randomized to each study arm. Outcomes showed significant pain reduction in both anterior and posterior knee VAS scores in the PACU in those that received PCI (anterior VAS: 39.6 vs 21.3 (SD = 12.9), p < 0.01; posterior VAS: 25.4 vs 15.3 (SD = 8.05), p = 0.01). Moreover, the PCI group also showed significantly less opioid consumption compared to FNB only (23.5 vs 17.4 pills, p = 0.03). There were no differences found in pain scores between groups in home VAS sores.CONCLUSIONS: These finding suggest the use of arthroscopically assisted injection of local anesthetic to the posterior capsule of the knee significantly reduces early post-operative pain and dramatically reduces the number of opoid medication taken after ACLR.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, randomized, control trial, Level I.
Comparison of Intra-Articular Low-Dose Sufentanil, Ropivacaine, and Combined Sufentanil and Ropivacaine on Post-Operative Analgesia of Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Xin Wang,Donglin Jia,Xiuyun Chen,Yan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2326-6

2012-01-01

Abstract:PURPOSE:To evaluate the effect of combined local anaesthetic and opioid in post-operative analgesia, the effect of intra-articular injection of local anaesthetic (ropivacaine), opioid (sufentanil) and combination of these two (ropivacaine combined with sufentanil) after the single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were compared.METHODS:In a prospective randomized double-blind design, 80 patients who underwent isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under epidural analgesia were randomly allocated to 4 groups, group A (n = 20) received 30 mL of 0.9% saline as the control group, group B (n = 20) received 10 mg ropivacaine and 2 μg sufentanil in 30 mL 0.9% saline, group C (n = 20) received 10 mg ropivacaine in 30 mL 0.9% saline, group D (n = 20) received 2 μg sufentanil in 30 mL 0.9% saline at the end of the operation. Pain was assessed by use of a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) which was evaluated at 6 and 24 h post-operation. The pain VAS score in active straight leg raising exercise, sleep quality and the status of the administered supplementary analgesia drugs during the first 24 h were also collected.RESULTS:Pain scores of each of the three experiment groups were significantly lower than the control group in every aspect. Group B (ropivacaine with sufentanil) had significant lower pain score than group C (ropivacaine) and group D (sufentanil) both at 6 and 24 h after the operation. Patients in group B, C or D showed significant better sleep qualities than group A. Significantly more patients in group A received supplementary analgesia than group B, C or D. In group B, no patient needed to receive intramuscular dolantin as supplementary analgesia.CONCLUSIONS:Intra-articular injection of opioid (sufentanil), local anaesthetic (ropivacaine) or combination of these two kinds of agents could significantly reduce the pain following the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. The combined intra-articular injection of opioid and local anaesthetic provided better analgesia effect than using sufentanil or ropivacaine alone.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Randomized controlled trial, Level I.
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Interventional Study

Tapan Dhumey,Nikhil Bhalerao,Amreesh Paul,Dnyanshree Wanjari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64625

2024-07-15

Cureus

Abstract:Background A common knee joint disorder is injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which often requires surgery. Proper pain control after the surgery facilitates fast recovery and prevents chronic pain. To provide analgesia for knee procedures, the use of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and regional techniques are commonly employed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs). Methodology This prospective interventional study included 30 participants scheduled for patellar graft ACLR. They were assigned into groups, i.e., ACB and FNB, with 15 patients each. The evaluation occurred one day before the operation, and all surgical procedures were performed using spinal anesthesia. During the postoperative period, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized to quantify pain intensity at the end of the surgery and at various intervals after the surgery. Patients with a VAS score greater than 4 received either FNB or ACB using bupivacaine 0.125%. Duration of analgesia time, power of quadriceps muscle, and neurologic complications were documented. Results No statistically significant value was observed in the mean duration of analgesia between the patients in ACB (348.33 minutes) and the patients in FNB (363.06 minutes). No motor block was observed in 12 patients who received ACB, while only four patients had a motor-sparing effect among those who received FNB. No neurological adverse effects were observed in the study participants. Conclusions ACB provides an equal duration of analgesia similar to FNB, and ACB significantly spares motor strength and maintains higher quadriceps power than FNB.
Protection of hydroxyl in the synthesis of semisynthetic beta-lactam antibiotics.

P. W. Woo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7164/ANTIBIOTICS.34.1157

1981-09-01

Abstract:The 2-methoxypropan-2-yl group fulfills the need of a hydroxyl protecting group generally suitable for the synthesis of beta-lactam antibiotics, satisfying the criteria of low-cost, convenience and selectivity in formation, and, above all, ease of deprotection under conditions compatible to the highly sensitive beta-lactam function and without contamination of the final products. The use of this protecting group has enabled the successful attachment of 6-[4-(N-acetyl-4-hydroxyl-L-prolylamino)phenyl]-1,2-dihydro - 2 - oxo - 3 - pyridinecarboxyl group, through an amide linkage, to amoxicillin, cephaloglycin, and the 3[[(1-carboxymethyl)-1-H-tetrazol-5-yl]thio]methyl analogue of the latter, yielding broad-spectrum antibiotics with notably good activities against strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Structure and function of vulture pecten.

S. R. Bawa,R. C. Yashroy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000144308

Acta Anatomica

Abstract:
Is This the Magic Trick We Were Missing?

Metaxia Bareka,Maria P. Ntalouka,Fragkiskos Angelis,Maria Mermiri,Aikaterini Tsiaka,Michael Hantes,Eleni Arnaoutoglou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041054

IF: 3.9

2024-02-14

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring grafting is a common orthopedic procedure that is associated with moderate-to-severe pain. Peripheral nerve blockade as an anesthetic technique is an appealing option in the era of modern anesthesia. The aim of this narrative review is to document the efficacy and safety of the combination of femoral, obturator, and sciatic (FOS) nerve blocks as an exclusive method for anesthesia in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. An electronic search of the literature published up to October 2023 was conducted in the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to find studies on ACL reconstruction and peripheral obturator nerve block. Overall, 8 prospective studies—with a total of 315 patients—published between 2007 and 2022 were included in this review. Ultrasound-guided peripheral FOS nerve blockade is an effective anesthetic technique for ACL reconstruction, offering good perioperative pain management, minimal opioid consumption, and an excellent safety profile. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to determine the best approach for obturator nerve blockade and the appropriate type and dosage of local anesthetic.

medicine, general & internal
Conformationally Gated Charge Transfer in DNA Three-Way Junctions.

Yuqi Zhang,Ryan M. Young,A. K. Thazhathveetil,Arunoday P N Singh,Chaoren Liu,Y. Berlin,F. Grozema,F. Lewis,M. Ratner,N. Renaud,Khatcharin Siriwong,A. Voityuk,M. Wasielewski,D. Beratan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00863

2015-06-11

Abstract:Molecular structures that direct charge transport in two or three dimensions possess some of the essential functionality of electrical switches and gates. We use theory, modeling, and simulation to explore the conformational dynamics of DNA three-way junctions (TWJs) that may control the flow of charge through these structures. Molecular dynamics simulations and quantum calculations indicate that DNA TWJs undergo dynamic interconversion among "well stacked" conformations on the time scale of nanoseconds, a feature that makes the junctions very different from linear DNA duplexes. The studies further indicate that this conformational gating would control charge flow through these TWJs, distinguishing them from conventional (larger size scale) gated devices. Simulations also find that structures with polyethylene glycol linking groups ("extenders") lock conformations that favor CT for 25 ns or more. The simulations explain the kinetics observed experimentally in TWJs and rationalize their transport properties compared with double-stranded DNA.
Comparative Effects of Spinal Anesthesia and Combined Spinal with Peripheral Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

Sanja Berić,Tamara Murselović,Mark Žižak,Stjepan Bulat,Goran Vrgoč

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226845

IF: 3.9

2024-11-17

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia (SA) alone versus combined spinal anesthesia with adductor canal block (ACB) and sciatic nerve block (SNB) (SA + ACB + SNB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesized that SA + ACB + SNB would provide better analgesia, greater patient satisfaction, and shorter postanesthesia recovery times than SA alone. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 patients aged 15–49 years scheduled for elective arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either SA or SA + ACB + SNB. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4, 12, and 24 h post-operation. General health was evaluated using the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) at 1 month postoperatively. Range of motion and analgesic consumption were also recorded. Results: The median VAS score at 4 h post-operation was significantly lower in the SA + ACB + SNB group compared to the SA group (0 [IQR: 0–1] vs. 2 [IQR: 1–3], p = 0.0137). No significant differences in VAS scores were found at 12 h (p = 0.9282) and 24 h (p = 0.5809). PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores did not differ significantly between groups. The SA group had a lower postoperative range of motion (ROM) compared to the SA + ACB + SNB group, with a mean active ROM of 40.67 degrees (±23.52) versus 72.17 degrees (±24.69), respectively (p < 0.0001). Analgesic consumption was similar, with 53.33% of participants in each group using postoperative analgesics (p = 1.0). The mean surgery duration was 74.6 min. The gender distribution was 83% male and 17% female, with an average age of 27.7 years. Conclusions: Adding ACB and SNB to spinal anesthesia improved immediate postoperative pain relief and preserved range of motion in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, suggesting potential clinical benefits in pain management and functional recovery.

medicine, general & internal
[Effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with imrecoxib on analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled study]

Yiyuan Sun,Yipeng Lin,Qi Li,Bohua Li,Duan Wang,Xihao Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202304068

2023-08-15

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with imrecoxib on analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A total of 160 patients with ACL injuries who met the selection criteria and were admitted between November 2020 and August 2021 were selected and divided into 4 groups according to the random number table method (n=40). Group A began to take imrecoxib 3 days before operation (100 mg/time, 2 times/day); group B began to take imrecoxib 1 day before operation (100 mg/time, 2 times/day); group C took 200 mg of imrecoxib 2 hours before operation (5 mL of water); and group D did not take any analgesic drugs before operation. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, constituent ratio of meniscal injuries with preoperative MRI grade 3, constituent ratio of cartilage injury Outerbridge grade 3, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the time of injury and at rest among 4 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, hospitalization stay, constituent ratio of perioperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 1, postoperative opioid dosage, and complications were recorded. The VAS scores were used to evaluate the degree of knee joint pain, including resting VAS scores before operation and at 6, 24, 48 hours, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and walking, knee flexion, and night VAS scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. The knee injury and osteoarthritis score (KOOS) was used to evaluate postoperative quality of life and knee-related symptoms of patients, mainly including pain, symptoms, daily activities, sports and entertainment functions, knee-related quality of life (QOL); and the Lysholm score was used to evaluate knee joint function. Results: All patients were followed up 1 year. There was no significant difference in operation time, hospitalization time, or constituent ratio of perioperative ASA grade 1 among 4 groups (P>0.05); the dosage of opioids in groups A-C was significantly less than that in group D (P<0.05). Except for 1 case of postoperative fever in group B, no complications such as joint infection, deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities, or knee joint instability occurred in each group. The resting VAS scores of groups A-C at 6 and 24 hours after operation were lower than those of group D, and the score of group A at 6 hours after operation was lower than those of group C, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the knee flexion VAS scores of groups A-C were lower than those of group D, the walking VAS scores of groups A and B were lower than those of groups C and D, the differences were significant (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the KOOS pain scores in groups A-C were higher than those in group D, there was significant difference between groups A, B and group D (P<0.05); the KOOS QOL scores in groups A-C were higher than that in group D, all showing significant differences (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups A-C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores and KOOS scores between the groups at other time points (P>0.05). And there was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional analgesic scheme, applying the concept of preemptive analgesia with imrecoxib to manage the perioperative pain of ACL reconstruction can effectively reduce the early postoperative pain, reduce the dosage of opioids, and promote the early recovery of limb function.

[Metabolic heterogeneity of hemoglobin].

Managing Perioperative Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Perspectives from a Sports Medicine Surgeon

Additional femoral nerve block analgesia does not reduce the chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

INTRA-ARTICULAR MORPHINE AND ROPIVACAINE INJECTION PROVIDES EFFICACIOUS ANALGESIA COMPARED TO FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK IN THE FIRST 24 HOURS POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH BTB IN AN ADOLESCENT COHORT

Postoperative Multimodal Approach to Pain Control in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft Surgery: A Single-Center Series

Editorial Commentary: Multiple Factors, Including Multimodal Anesthesia, Can Reduce Opioid Requirements After Rotator Cuff Repair

Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Adductor Canal Block for Managing Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Postoperative Pain Control After ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia

Lower Opioid Prescription Quantity Does Not Negatively Impact Pain Control or Patient Satisfaction After ACL Reconstruction

The formation of fast-sedimenting turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA: structural rearrangement inside the capsid.

Femoral Nerve Block and Local Instillation Analgesia Associated With More Reliable Efficacy in Regional Anesthesia Interventions Within 24 Hours Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Network Meta-analysis

Deletion of the H19 transcription unit reveals the existence of a putative imprinting control element.

Posterior capsule injection of local anesthetic for post-operative pain control after ACL reconstruction: a prospective, randomized trial

Comparison of Intra-Articular Low-Dose Sufentanil, Ropivacaine, and Combined Sufentanil and Ropivacaine on Post-Operative Analgesia of Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Interventional Study

Protection of hydroxyl in the synthesis of semisynthetic beta-lactam antibiotics.

Structure and function of vulture pecten.

Is This the Magic Trick We Were Missing?

Conformationally Gated Charge Transfer in DNA Three-Way Junctions.

Comparative Effects of Spinal Anesthesia and Combined Spinal with Peripheral Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair

[Effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with imrecoxib on analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled study]