UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions
Jill Cadwgan,Jane Goodwin,Barbara Babcock,Molly Brick,Richard Chin,Ava Easton,Ben Green,Siobhan Hannan,Rhys P. D. Inward,Suzannah Kinsella,Callum King,Manju A. Kurian,Phillip Levine,Andrew Mallick,Jeremy Parr,Carol Anne Partridge,Sam Amin,Dan Lumsden,J. Helen Cross,Ming J. Lim,UK Childhood Neurological Disorders PSP Group,Anne‐Marie Childs,Vijeya Ganesan,Anthony Hart,Rachel Kneen,Robert McFarland,Evangeline Wassmer,William P Whitehouse,Ruth Williams,Tom Arichi,Vicky Burford,Sarah Crombie,Laavanya Damodaran,Paul Eunson,Paul Gringras,Anne Gordon,Emily Harrop,Anthony Hart,Catherine Martin,Carla Rush,Catherine Tuffrey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16021
2024-07-18
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Abstract:Aim To identify research priorities regarding the effectiveness of interventions for children and young people (CYP) with childhood neurological conditions (CNCs). These include common conditions such as epilepsies and cerebral palsy, as well as many rare conditions. Method The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) champion and facilitate priority setting partnerships (PSPs) between patients, caregivers, and clinicians (stakeholders) to identify the most important unanswered questions for research (uncertainties). A NIHR–JLA and British Paediatric Neurology Association collaboration used the JLA PSP methodology. This consisted of two surveys to stakeholders: survey 1 (to identify uncertainties) and survey 2 (a prioritization survey). The final top 10 priorities were agreed by consensus in a stakeholder workshop. Results One hundred and thirty‐two charities and partner organizations were invited to participate. In survey 1, 701 participants (70% non‐clinicians, including CYP and parent and caregivers) submitted 1800 uncertainties from which 44 uncertainties were identified for prioritization in survey 2; from these, 1451 participants (83% non‐clinicians) selected their top 10 priorities. An unweighted amalgamated score across participant roles was used to select 26. In the final workshop, 14 health care professionals, 11 parent and caregivers, and two CYP ranked the 26 questions to finalize the top 10 priorities. Ten top priority questions were identified regarding interventions to treat CYP with CNCs and their associated comorbidities, for example, sleep, emotional well‐being, and distressing symptoms. Interpretation The results of this study will inform research into the effectiveness of interventions for children with neurological conditions.
pediatrics,clinical neurology