Identification of Grossing Criteria for Intraoperative Evaluation by Frozen Section of Lung Cancer Resection Margins
Andréanne Gagné,Étienne Racine,Michèle Orain,Salma Meziou,Serge Simard,Christian Couture,Sylvain Pagé,Sylvain Trahan,Paula Ugalde,Yves Lacasse,David Joubert,Philippe Joubert,Racine, Étienne,Pagé, Sylvain,Orain, Michèle,Meziou, Salma,Lacasse, Yves,Joubert, Philippe,Trahan, Sylvain,Couture, Christian,Joubert, David,Simard, Serge,Ugalde, Paula,Gagné, Andréanne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001138
2019-10-04
Abstract:Because of a lack of official guidelines, systematic use of intraoperative frozen section for the evaluation of surgical margins in lung oncology constitutes standard practice in many pathology departments. This costly and time-consuming procedure seems unjustified as reported rates of positive margins remain low. We aimed to evaluate clinicopathologic criteria associated with positive margins and establish evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of frozen sections. This retrospective cohort included 1903 consecutive patients with a lung resection for malignant neoplasm between 2006 and 2015. Clinicopathologic data were retrieved from medical files. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables associated with a positive margin. Receiver operating characteristic curves and a probability table of positive margins based on tumor-margin distance were created. Our results were confirmed in a validation cohort of 27 patients with positive margins. The rate of positive margins was 3.8%. A positive margin status changed the surgical management in 48.6% of patients. A short macroscopic tumor-margin distance was associated with a higher risk of positive bronchovascular and parenchymal margins in univariate and multivariate analyses. Selecting a 2.0 cm tumor-margin distance cut-off for performing a frozen section would result in a 55.3% reduction of intraoperative evaluations, with a risk of missing a positive margin of 0.61%. Overall, we showed that systematic use of frozen section for intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins is unnecessary. A better selection of patients with a higher risk of a positive margin can be achieved with tumor-margin distance as a simple gross evaluation parameter.
pathology,surgery