Single-drug immunosuppression is associated with noninferior medium-term survival in pediatric heart transplant recipients

Laurence Watelle,Moustapha Touré,Jacqueline M Lamour,Mariska S Kemna,Joseph A Spinner,Timothy M Hoffman,Waldemar F Carlo,Jean A Ballweg,Steven C Greenway,Frederic Dallaire
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.1705
Abstract:Background: Patients are usually maintained on at least 2 immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) after the first year post heart transplant. Anecdotally, some children are switched to single-drug monotherapy (a single ISD) for various reasons and varying durations. Outcomes associated with differences in immunosuppression after heart transplantation are unknown for children. Objectives: A priori we defined a noninferiority hypothesis for monotherapy compared to ≥2 ISDs. The primary outcome was graft failure, a composite of death and retransplantation. Secondary outcomes included rejection, infection, malignancy, cardiac allograft vasculopathy and dialysis. Methods: This international, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study used data from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society. We included patients who underwent first-time heart transplant <18 years of age between 1999 and 2020 with ≥1 year of follow-up data available. Results: Our analysis included 3493 patients with a median time post-transplant of 6.7 years. There were 893 patients (25.6%) switched to monotherapy at least once with the remaining 2600 patients always on ≥2 ISDs. The median time on monotherapy after the first year post-transplant was 2.8 years (range 1.1-5.9 years). We found an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.47-0.88) favoring monotherapy compared to ≥2 ISDs (p = 0.002). There were no meaningful differences in the incidence of secondary outcomes between groups, except for a lower rate of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in patients on monotherapy (HR 0.58, 95%CI: 0.45-0.74). Conclusions: For pediatric heart transplant recipients placed on monotherapy, immunosuppression with a single ISD after the first year post-transplant was noninferior to standard therapy with ≥2 ISDs in the medium term. Condensed abstract: Some children are switched to a single immunosuppressive drug (ISD) for various reasons after heart transplant, but outcomes associated with differences in immunosuppression are unknown for children. We assessed graft failure in children on a single ISD (monotherapy) compared to ≥2 ISDs in a cohort of 3493 children with a first heart transplant. We found an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.47-0.88) favoring monotherapy. We concluded that for pediatric heart transplant recipients placed on monotherapy, immunosuppression with a single ISD after the first year post-transplant was non-inferior to standard therapy with ≥2 ISDs in the medium term.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?