Abstract:BackgroundWearable sensor systems can provide data for at-home gait analyses and input to controllers for rehabilitation devices but they often have reduced estimation accuracy compared to laboratory systems. The goal of this study is to evaluate a portable, low-cost system for measuring ground reaction forces and ankle joint torques in treadmill walking and calf raises.MethodsTo estimate the ground reaction forces and ankle joint torques, we developed a custom instrumented insole and a tissue force sensor. Six healthy subjects completed a collection of movements (calf raises, 1.0 m/s walking, and 1.5 m/s walking) on two separate days. We trained artificial neural networks on the study data and compared the estimates to a multi-camera motion system and an instrumented treadmill. We evaluated the relative strength of each sensor by testing each sensor’s ability to predict the ankle joint torque calculated from a reference inverse kinematics algorithm. We assessed model accuracy through root mean squared error and normalized root mean square error. We hypothesized that the estimation of the models would have normalized root mean square error measures less than 10 %.ResultsFor walking at 1.0 and walking at 1.5 m/s, the single-task, intra-day and multi-task, intra-day predictions had normalized root mean square error less than 10 % for all three force components and both center of pressure components. For the calf raise task, the single-task, intra-day and multi-task, intra-day predictions had normalized root mean square error less than 10 % for only the anterior-posterior center of pressure. The multi-task, intra-day model had similar predictions to the single-task, intra-day model. The normalized root mean square error of predictions from the insole sensor alone were less than 10 % for walking at 1.0 m/s and 1.5 m/s. No sensor was sufficient for the calf raise task. The combination of the insole sensor and the tendon sensor had lower normalized root mean square error than the individual sensors for all three tasks.ConclusionsThe proposed sensor system provided accurate estimates for five of the six components of the ground reaction kinetics during walking at 1.0 and 1.5 m/s and one of the six components during the calf raise task. The normalized root mean square error of the predictions of the ground reaction forces were similar to published studies using commercial devices. The proposed system of low-cost sensors can provide useful estimations of ankle joint torque for both walking and calf raises for future studies in mobile gait analysis.

Characterization of change in microcontroller susceptibility during accelerated aging

Assessment of Ground Contact Time in the Field: Evaluation of Validity and Reliability

Estimation of Temporal Parameters During Running with a Wrist-worn Inertial Sensor: an In-field Validation

From lab to field: validity and reliability of inertial measurement unit-derived gait parameters during a standardised run

Validity and Reliability of Thoracic-Mounted Inertial Measurement Units to Derive Gait Characteristics During Running

Native chromatin immunoprecipitation.

Parameterization of Biomechanical Variables through Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) in Occasional Healthy Runners

Accuracy of three methods in gait event detection during overground running

Ageing purpose: another thrifty genotype.

Real-time inertial lower body kinematics and ground contact estimation at anatomical foot points for agile human locomotion

Consumer-priced wearable sensors combined with deep learning can be used to accurately predict ground reaction forces during various treadmill running conditions

Development of a Non-Contacting Muscular Activity Measurement System for Evaluating Knee Extensors Training in Real-Time

Comparison of yellow dent and NutriDense corn hybrids in swine diets.

Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Estimation of Foot Trajectory for Clinical Gait Analysis

Estimation of Ground Contacts from Human Gait by a Wearable Inertial Measurement Unit using machine learning

Estimation of ground reaction forces and ankle moment with multiple, low-cost sensors

Accuracy and Interpretation of the Acceleration from an Inertial Measurement Unit When Applied to the Sprint Performance of Track and Field Athletes

Validity of Inertial Measurement Units to Measure Lower-Limb Kinematics and Pelvic Orientation at Submaximal and Maximal Effort Running Speeds

Algorithm for Gait Parameters Estimation Based on Heel-Mounted Inertial Sensors

A 0.05 m Change in Inertial Measurement Unit Placement Alters Time and Frequency Domain Metrics during Running

A method for embedding thin membranes in historesin.