Abstract:I write in response to the intriguing article authored by Andrea-Grosso et al. [1], which explores the comparison between robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Several review articles have also delved into this topic, primarily focusing on parameters such as surgical time, hospital stay, and catheterization time. In these aspects, RASP often finds itself unable to match the advantages offered by HoLEP. However, when considering postoperative urinary incontinence and urethral stricture, HoLEP appears to fall short, presenting challenges for both surgeons and patients alike. Postoperative urinary incontinence following benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery is influenced by a variety of factors. These include non-modifiable factors such as patient age, prostate size, body weight [2], and the stage of BPH progression [3], as well as modifiable factors like the choice of surgical technique, ranging from robotic simple prostatectomy to various transurethral enucleation methods. Among the transurethral techniques, there are several approaches, including anteroposterior [4], top-down, Omega sign, and AFS-preserved [5] enucleation. The relative merits and drawbacks of each technique are currently under active investigation, with ongoing research seeking to determine the most effective approach in mitigating postoperative incontinence. HoLEP entails retrograde access through the urethra to initiate enucleation within the prostate, passing through the external sphincter (ES) before entering the prostate. Consequently, the current mainstream approach involves early apical release, aimed at safeguarding the ES or the portions of the ES extending into the prostate from potential damage during subsequent traction injury. This protective measure has proven effective in significantly reducing postoperative urinary incontinence [4]. Conversely, RASP proceeds in an antegrade fashion entailing a transverse anterior incision of the prostate capsule to access the transition zone (T zone) of the prostate, with the ES serving as the endpoint. During the inevitable process of dissecting and separating the T zone and peripheral zone, as dictated by surgical principles, forces are applied to the T zone through traction and counter-traction to achieve successful separation. Remarkably, despite the greater force exerted by robotic instruments compared to endoscopy, this process does not result in the urinary incontinence hypothesized in HoLEP.

Comparison of Contemporary Surgical Outcomes Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy

The Diagnostic Value of Prostate Cancer Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Comparative Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) in BPH Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Differential Outcomes in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs. Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Modified Two-Lobe Technique Versus Traditional Three-Lobe Technique—A Randomized Study

Perioperative Outcome of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate versus Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Influence of anterior fibromuscular stroma on incontinence outcomes in RASP and HoLEP: a critical analysis of Grosso et al.'s findings

Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Advancing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Outcomes Reporting: An Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Literature

Shifting Trends in Prostate Treatment: A Systematic Review Comparing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate with Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized, Prospective Controlled Trial at Midterm Follow-Up

Efficacy and safety of low power holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A prospective short- and medium-term single-blind randomized trial

Single-Port Extraperitoneal vs. Multiport Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic resection of prostate: a randomized trial with 72-month follow-up.

Contemporary Trends of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) Utilization in the United States: A Comprehensive Analysis Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database (2011-2020)

Retrospective Comparison Of The Modified And Traditional Holmium Laser Transurethral Prostatectomy Based On A 1-Year Follow-Up

Early Outcomes of Single-Site Versus Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison Of Plasmakinetic Enucleation Of The Prostate With Holmium Laser Enucleation Of The Prostate In The Treatment Of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Critical analysis of a multicentric experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes and complications of 10 years of routine clinical practice

Modified robotic simple prostatectomy technique: a retrospective analysis of a series of 162 surgeries performed by a high-volume surgeon

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Is Safe and Feasible as a Same Day Surgery