Atypical antipsychotic use in Australian patients: cross-sectional study of uptake and perceived benefit

A. Harris,P. Rogers,G. Moore,D. Toscano,A. Redoblado-Hodge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0924270800030350
2006-12-01
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Abstract:Background: Major depressive disorder may be a heterogeneous disorder; yet, melancholic depression is the most consistently described subtype, regarded as qualitatively different to nonmelancholic depression in terms of cognitive and motor impairments. Eye movement studies in depression are infrequent and fi ndings are inconclusive. Methods: This study used a battery of saccadic (very fast) eye movements to explore refl exive saccades, as well as higher order cognitive aspects of saccades including inhibitory control and spatial working memory. Nineteen patients with major depressive disorder (9 melancholic, 10 nonmelancholic) and 15 healthy controls participated. Results: Differences were showed between melancholic and nonmelancholic patients. Melancholia was associated with longer latencies, diffi culty increasing peak velocities as target amplitudes increased and hypometric primary saccades during the predictable protocol. In contrast, the nonmelancholic depression group performed similarly to controls on most tasks, but saccadic peak velocity was increased for refl exive saccades at larger amplitudes. Conclusions: The latency increases, reduced peak velocity and primary saccade hypometria with more severe melancholia may be explained by functional changes in the fronto-striatal-collicular networks, related to dopamine dysfunction. In contrast, the serotonergic system plays a greater role in nonmelancholic symptoms and this may underpin the observed increases in saccadic peak velocity. These fi ndings provide neurophysiological support for functional differences between depression subgroups that are consistent with previous motor and cognitive fi ndings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?