CT-based comparison of porcine, ovine, and human pulmonary arterial morphometry
Leonid Goubergrits,Marie Schafstedde,Nikola Cesarovic,Angelika Szengel,Boris Schmitt,Moritz Wiegand,Jan Romberg,Andreas Arndt,Titus Kuehne,Jan Brüning
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47532-8
IF: 4.6
2023-11-19
Scientific Reports
Abstract:To facilitate pre-clinical animal and in-silico clinical trials for implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors, understanding the respective species pulmonary arteries (PA) anatomy is important. Thus, morphological parameters describing PA of pigs and sheep, which are common animal models, were compared with humans. Retrospective computed tomography data of 41 domestic pigs (82.6 ± 18.8 kg), 14 sheep (49.1 ± 6.9 kg), and 49 patients (76.8 ± 18.2 kg) were used for reconstruction of the subject-specific PA anatomy. 3D surface geometries including main, left, and right PA as well as LPA and RPA side branches were manually reconstructed. Then, specific geometric parameters (length, diameters, taper, bifurcation angle, curvature, and cross-section enlargement) affecting device implantation and post-interventional device effect and efficacy were automatically calculated. For both animal models, significant differences to the human anatomy for most geometric parameters were found, even though the respective parameters' distributions also featured relevant overlap. Out of the two animal models, sheep seem to be better suitable for a preclinical study when considering only PA morphology. Reconstructed geometries are provided as open data for future studies. These findings support planning of preclinical studies and will help to evaluate the results of animal trials.
multidisciplinary sciences