Women in Plastic Surgery Innovation
Helen Xun,Jose A. Foppiani,Valeria P. Bustos,Lauren Valentine,Allan Weidman,Angelica Hernandez Alvarez,JacqueLyn Kinney,Miroslava Verbat,Ashley Boustany,Bernard T. Lee,Samuel J. Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000003872
2024-04-01
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Abstract:Background This study aims to pioneer in evaluating women's representation in plastic surgery innovations, focusing on mammary prosthesis devices' inventorship. Despite growing gender parity in the field, women's involvement in innovation remains underexplored. This is especially crucial, as the predominant recipients of these innovative technologies are women, urging a necessity for broader female engagement in pioneering surgical advancements. Method Patents under the “A61F2/12: Mammary prostheses and implants” classification between the dates January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, were identified using Google Patents Advanced. Inclusion criteria included patents (not designs) in English and applications (not grants), with no litigation limitations. Data collected included ID, title, assignee (categorized as industry, academic, private, individual), inventors, and dates (priority, filing, and publication). Sex of inventors was identified with the literature validated gender API, with manual resolution of unresolved genders or with ga_accuracy scores of less than 75%. Data were analyzed using 2-tailed Student t tests, χ 2 analysis, and Pearson correlation coefficient (significance set at P ≤ 0.05). Results Of the more than 130,000 plastic surgery patents in English identified between the 10-year period, 1355 were classified as A61F2/12. A total of 374 unique patents were included for analysis (841 duplicates were removed, and 140 patents were excluded because of non-English character author names). There was a significant increase in patents over the decade (from 15 in 2011 to 88 in 2020, R 2 = 0.74, P < 0.05), with a decrease in number of inventors per patent ( R 2 = 0.12, P < 0.05). Of the 1102 total inventors, 138 were female (11.2%), with a 4-fold increase in representation over the decade ( R 2 = 0.58, P < 0.05), including increase in patents filed with a woman first inventor (0%–14.8%). Women were equally likely to be first 3 inventors versus middle to last inventors (12.8% vs 11.1%, respectively). Conclusions Over a decade, mammary device innovations rose significantly. Although women inventors' representation improved, it remains disproportionate compared with women in residency/practice. Hence, interventions should aim to align inventor representation with training ratios, through institutional optimization, reducing gender segmentation, and enhancing funding opportunities.
surgery