Two-year trends from the LANDMARC study: A 3-year, pan-India, prospective, longitudinal study on the management and real-world outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Ashok K Das,Sanjay Kalra,Shashank Joshi,Ambrish Mithal,Prasanna Kumar K M,Ambika G Unnikrishnan,Hemant Thacker,Bipin Sethi,Subhankar Chowdhury,Amarnath Sugumaran,Senthilnathan Mohanasundaram,Shalini K Menon,Vaibhav Salvi,Deepa Chodankar,Saket Thaker,Chirag Trivedi,Subhash K Wangnoo,Abdul H Zargar,Nadeem Rais
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.404
Abstract:Introduction: There are limited data on the real-world management of diabetes in the Indian population. In this 2-year analysis of the LANDMARC study, the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and related complications were assessed. Method: This multicenter, observational, prospective study included adults aged ≥25 to ≤60 years diagnosed with T2DM (duration ≥2 years at enrollment) and controlled/uncontrolled on ≥2 anti-diabetic agents. This interim analysis at 2 years reports the status of glycaemic control, diabetic complications, cardiovascular (CV) risks and therapy, pan-India including metropolitan and non-metropolitan cities. Results: Of the 6234 evaluable patients, 5318 patients completed 2 years in the study. Microvascular complications were observed in 17.6% of patients (1096/6234); macrovascular complications were observed in 3.1% of patients (195/6234). Higher number of microvascular complications were noted in patients from non-metropolitan than in metropolitan cities (p < .0001). In 2 years, an improvement of 0.6% from baseline (8.1%) in mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was noted; 20.8% of patients met optimum glycaemic control (HbA1c < 7%). Hypertension (2679/3438, 77.9%) and dyslipidaemia (1776/3438, 51.7%) were the predominant CV risk factors in 2 years. The number of patients taking oral anti-diabetic drugs in combination with insulin increased in 2 years (baseline: 1498/6234 [24.0%] vs. 2 years: 1917/5763 [33.3%]). While biguanides and sulfonylureas were the most commonly prescribed, there was an evident increase in the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (baseline: 3049/6234, 48.9% vs. 2 years: 3526/5763, 61.2%). Conclusion: This longitudinal study represents the control of T2DM, its management and development of complications in Indian population. Clinical trial registration number: CTRI/2017/05/008452.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?