Abstract:Since Dempsey and Lathan1 introduced submuscular breast augmentation for the first time in 1968, this procedure has been considerably refined and it is still today the dominant way of performing a breast augmentation. In the 1970s, the main reason to use submuscular breast augmentation was because it reduced the frequency of capsular contraction when smooth implants were inserted. In the late 1970s, textured silicone implants were introduced as another way to reduce the very high frequency of capsular contraction noted with smooth implants in the subglandular space. It is well documented that textured implant surfaces reduce capsular contraction in the subglandular space.2 The main reason to avoid submuscular breast augmentation in this early period of breast augmentation was because of the animation deformities created during pectoralis activity. With a full muscle cover, there is a great deal of movement, especially when using smooth implants. With the introduction of dual-plane breast augmentation by Tebbetts in 2001,3 the outcome of submuscular breast augmentation improved greatly. In the study by Roxo et al, the authors describe a submuscular breast augmentation technique that should be regarded as a dual-plane I technique.4 In this technique, the inferomedial origin of the pectoralis is released without subglandular dissection on top of the muscle, and it is surprising to read that none of the patients in this study had any animation deformities. In my personal experience, the dual-plane I technique always creates animation deformities and thus it is a technique that I avoid. In dual-plane II and III techniques, a subglandular dissection is done in the lower pole of the breast, allowing the lateral part of the pectoralis muscle to retract away from the capsule but maintaining muscle along the sternum distal to the level of the nipple areola complex. Therefore, with dual-plane II and III techniques, animation deformities are greatly minimized. It would have been interesting to view some preoperative and postoperative photographs of procedures that involved tightening the pectoralis muscle to see if the statement that no animation deformity was noted is correct. Surgeons are recommended to always take animation photographs to evaluate the movement of the pectoralis muscle after breast augmentation. My personal preference for performing submuscular breast augmentation is also to avoid division of the muscle in its most inferior part, because this does not allow reconstruction of the submammary fold by suturing of Scarpa’s fascia to the thoracic fascia.5,6 It is instead recommended that the muscle division is done 2 to 3 cm above the implant’s lower pole position, where the fold should be recreated. If the muscle is divided too close to the fold, the distally divided part of the muscle can unfold and this does not allow a good fixation and recreation of the fold. A benefit of submuscular breast augmentation with dualplane techniques is much better cover of the implant edge, especially in the décolletage. This minimizes implant visibility and rippling, and it is likely also to reduce the atrophy of the overlying gland. Contrary to what the inexperienced surgeon believes, a submuscular breast augmentation is also usually a quicker procedure than subglandular breast

THE STABILITY OF ADRENALINE OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS ON STERILIZATION AND STORAGE

Oncogenic Osteomalacia in Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Case Report and Literature Review

A Retrospective Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Efficacy and the Complications: Between CassiII Rotational Core Biopsy and Core Needle Biopsy

Preliminary Screening of Antibacterial Activity Using Crude Extracts of Hibiscus rosa sinensis.

Retrospective study of diagnosis and treatment of renal oncocytoma

Safety and Diagnostic Efficacy of Image-Guided Biopsy of Small Renal Masses

[Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Renal Oncocytoma: 26 Cases Report].

Symmetrical infarction of the cervical spinal cord due to spontaneous bilateral vertebral artery dissection.

Unusual Case of Coronary Thrombosis

Renal cell oncocytoma tumor evolutions: a case report

Management, outcomes and predictors of recurrence in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Results from the Canadian Kidney Cancer information system (CKCis).

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of renal biopsy cytology

Initial Management of Indeterminate Renal Lesions in a Statewide Collaborative: A MUSIC-KIDNEY Analysis

Commentary on: Functional and Volumetric Analysis of the Pectoralis Major Muscle After Submuscular Breast Augmentation.

Renal oncocytoma with adverse pathologic features: a clinical and pathologic study of 50 cases

Distinguishing Benign Renal Tumors with an Oncocytic Gene Expression (ONEX) Classifier

Connexin 43 ( GJA 1 ) is required in the population of dividing cells during fi n regeneration

Perioperative Complications and Oncologic Outcomes of Nephrectomy Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: A Multicenter Collaborative Study

[Percutaneous biopsy of the renal masses under ultrasound: a single-center 14 years experience].

Time-Resolved Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

Real‐world study on the characteristics, post‐nephrectomy journey, and outcomes of patients with early‐stage renal cell carcinoma based on risk groups