Oncologic surveillance after surgical treatment for clinically localized kidney cancer: UroCCR study n. 129
Alberto Martini,Jean-Christophe Bernhard,Ugo G Falagario,Guillaume Herman,Arna Geshkovska,Zine-Eddine Khene,François Audenet,Cecile Champy,Franck Bruyere,Muriel Rolland,Thibaut Waeckel,Martin Lorette,Nicolas Doumerc,Louis Surlemont,Bastien Parier,Thibault Tricard,Nicolas Branger,Constance Michel,Gaëlle Fiard,Alexis Fontenil,Maxime Vallée,Julien Guillotreau,Jean-Jacques Patard,Charlotte Joncour,Romain Boissier,Idir Ouzaid,Frédéric Panthier,Olivier Belas,Richard Mallet,Pierre Gimel,Stéphane DE Vergie,Pierre Bigot,Jean B Beauval
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05857-9
Abstract:Background: In 2021, the EAU Guidelines implemented a novel, expert opinion-based follow-up scheme, with a three-risk-category system for clear cell (cc) and non-cc renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) after surgery with curative intent. We aimed to validate the novel follow-up scheme and provide data-driven recurrence estimates according to risk groups, to confirm or implement the oncologic surveillance strategy. Methods: We identified 5,320 patients from a prospectively maintained database involving 28 French referral centers. The risk of recurrence, as either loco-regional or distant, was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method for each group (low- intermediate- or high-risk) according to ccRCC or non-ccRCC histology. The noncumulative distribution of recurrences was graphically investigated through the LOWESS smoother. Results: Two thousand two hundred ninety-three (58%), 926 (23%), and 738 (19%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk ccRCC, and 683 (50%), 297 (22%), and 383 (28%) had low-, intermediate, and high-risk non-ccRCC, respectively. Median follow-up for survivors was 46 months. Overall, 661 patients experienced recurrence. Over time, the noncumulative risk of recurrence was approximately 10% for low-risk cc-RCC, non-ccRCC, and intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, with non-significant difference among the three recurrence functions (P=0.9). At 5-year, time point after which imaging should be de-intensified to biennial, the noncumulative risks of recurrence were: for intermediate risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 15% and 11%, respectively; for high-risk ccRCC and non-ccRCC: 24% and 8%, respectively. Among high-risk non-ccRCC patients there were 9 recurrences at 3-month. There was no significant difference between the recurrence function of high-risk non-ccRCC patients with negative imaging at 3-month and the one of intermediate-risk ccRCC (P=0.3). Conclusions: Given the relatively low recurrence risk of patients with intermediate-risk non-ccRCC, those individuals could be followed up with a similar strategy to the low-risk category. Similarly, patients with high-risk non-ccRCC with negative imaging at 3-month, could be followed up similarly to intermediate-risk ccRCC after the 3-month time point.