Abstract:BackgroundNutrition therapy is essential in critically ill adults. Little is known about appropriate nutrition therapy in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection. MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational study in adult patients with confirmed COVID‐19 infection receiving mechanical ventilation. Data regarding patient demographics and nutrition therapy were collected. Patients that received enteral nutrition within 24 hours of starting mechanical ventilation were compared with patients starting enteral nutrition later. The primary outcome was inpatient length of stay. Propensity score matching was conducted to control for baseline differences in patient groups. ResultsOne hundred fifty‐five patients were included in final analysis. Patients who received enteral nutrition within 24 hours received a significantly greater daily amount of calories (17.5 vs 15.2 kcal/kg, P = .015) and protein (1.04 vs 0.85 g/kg, P = .003). There was no difference in length of stay (18.5 vs 23.5 days, P = .37). The propensity score analysis included 100 patients. Following propensity scoring, significant differences in daily calorie (17.7 [4.6] vs 15.1 [5.1] kcal/kg/d, P = .009) and protein (1.03 [0.35] vs 0.86 [0.38] g/kg/d, P = .014) provision remained. No differences in length of stay or other outcomes were noted in the propensity score analysis. ConclusionInitiation of enteral nutrition within 24 hours was not associated with improved outcomes in mechanically ventilated adults with COVID‐19. No harm was detected either. Future research should seek to clarify optimal timing of enteral nutrition initiation in patients with COVID‐19 who require mechanical ventilation. IntroductionNutrition therapy plays an important role in the management of critically ill patients. Significant delay in initiation of enteral nutrition with accumulation of caloric deficit has been associated with more nosocomial infections, longer length of stay, and higher mortality.1-3, 4 Enteral nutrition is the delivery route of choice, as it promotes gut integrity and reduces systemic inflammation when compared with parenteral nutrition.5, 6 Guidelines recommend initiation of enteral nutrition within 24–48 hours of onset of critical illness in patients who cannot take in nutrition orally on their own.7, 8Although early nutrition intervention is widely accepted as standard of care, much is unknown about optimal nutrition therapy practices. Although some studies have found that early, aggressive calorie provision via enteral nutrition is beneficial, other studies have demonstrated that trophic or hypocaloric feeding may yield similar outcomes.9, 10 Early use of parenteral nutrition to meet 100% of caloric goals has not been shown to significantly improve outcomes.11, 12 The optimal amount of nutrition provision is especially controversial in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury (ALI). One randomized controlled trial in patients with ALI found no benefit to full enteral nutrition as opposed to trophic feeding for the first 6 days of mechanical ventilation.13 Another randomized controlled trial in patients with ALI was terminated early because full nutrition was associated with higher mortality.14Like many other therapeutic -Abstract Truncated-

Challenges of Gastric Versus Post-pyloric Feeding in COVID-19 Disease

How Differences in the Disease Process of the COVID-19 Pandemic Pose Challenges to the Delivery of Critical Care Nutrition

Comparison of Postpyloric Tube Feeding and Gastric Tube Feeding in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Effect of gastric versus post-pyloric feeding on the incidence of pneumonia in critically ill patients: observations from traditional and Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis.

Postintubation Dysphagia During COVID-19 Outbreak-Contemporary Review

The Effects of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Early Enteral Nutrition in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID‐19 Infection

Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019

A Review of the Tolerance and Adequacy of Enteral Nutrition Administered in the Prone Position in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

Nutrition delivery across hospitalisation in critically ill patients with COVID-19: An observational study of the Australian experience

Gastric-tube versus post-pyloric feeding in critical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary aspiration- and nutrition-related outcomes

Challenges to Provision of Adequate Medical Nutrition Therapy in a Critically Ill COVID-19 Patient Fed in the Prone Position

A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients

Nutrition management for critically and acutely unwell hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Australia and New Zealand

Severity of illness influences the efficacy of enteral feeding route on clinical outcomes in patients with critical illness

How to avoid harm with feeding critically ill patients: a synthesis of viewpoints of a basic scientist, dietitian and intensivist

Experience of post-pyloric feeding in seriously ill patients in clinical practice

Nutrition of the COVID-19 patient in the intensive care unit (ICU): a practical guidance

Bedside naso-jejunal placement is more difficult, but successful in patients with COVID-19 in critical care: A retrospective service evaluation of a dietitian-led service

Dysphagia in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective study

Gut, Metabolism and Nutritional Support for COVID-19: Experiences from China