Abstract:BackgroundEnteral nutrition (EN) is recommended as the preferred route for early nutrition therapy in critically ill adults over parenteral nutrition (PN). A recent large randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed no outcome differences between the two routes. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of the route of nutrition (EN versus PN) on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients.MethodsAn electronic search from 1980 to 2016 was performed identifying relevant RCTs. Individual trial data were abstracted and methodological quality of included trials scored independently by two reviewers. The primary outcome was overall mortality and secondary outcomes included infectious complications, length of stay (LOS) and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the treatment effect by dissimilar caloric intakes, year of publication and trial methodology. We performed a test of asymmetry to assess for the presence of publication bias.ResultsA total of 18 RCTs studying 3347 patients met inclusion criteria. Median methodological score was 7 (range, 2–12). No effect on overall mortality was found (1.04, 95 % CI 0.82, 1.33, P = 0.75, heterogeneity I2 = 11 %). EN compared to PN was associated with a significant reduction in infectious complications (RR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.48, 0.87, P = 0.004, I2 = 47 %). This was more pronounced in the subgroup of RCTs where the PN group received significantly more calories (RR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.37, 0.82, P = 0.003, I2 = 0 %), while no effect was seen in trials where EN and PN groups had a similar caloric intake (RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.80, 1.10, P = 0.44, I2 = 0 %; test for subgroup differences, P = 0.003). Year of publication and methodological quality did not influence these findings; however, a publication bias may be present as the test of asymmetry was significant (P = 0.003). EN was associated with significant reduction in ICU LOS (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.80, 95 % CI −1.23, −0.37, P = 0.0003, I2 = 0 %) while no significant differences in hospital LOS and mechanical ventilation were observed.ConclusionsIn critically ill patients, the use of EN as compared to PN has no effect on overall mortality but decreases infectious complications and ICU LOS. This may be explained by the benefit of reduced macronutrient intake rather than the enteral route itself.

Severity of illness influences the efficacy of enteral feeding route on clinical outcomes in patients with critical illness

A more physiological feeding process in ICU: Intermittent infusion with semi-solid nutrients (CONSORT-compliant).

Comparison of Postpyloric Tube Feeding and Gastric Tube Feeding in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Meta-Analysis

The Effectiveness of Intermittent Nasogastric Feeding on Enteral Nutrition of Critical Patients：a Meta-analysis

Effect of gastric versus post-pyloric feeding on the incidence of pneumonia in critically ill patients: observations from traditional and Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis.

The Route of Enteral Feeding in Patients with Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study

Effectiveness of Enteral Feeding Protocol on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Before and after Study

Early Enteral Nutrition Support Dose Selection in Critically Ill Patients: a Meta Analysis

Early Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition In Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Trials

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effect of intermittent versus continuous enteral feeding for critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Effects of continuous versus bolus infusion of enteral nutrition in critical patients

Gastric-tube versus post-pyloric feeding in critical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary aspiration- and nutrition-related outcomes

Comparison of Feeding Efficiency and Hospital Mortality between Small Bowel and Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Critically Ill Patients at High Nutritional Risk

A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients

Prevalence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and treatment of enteral feed intolerance during critical illness

Prevalence and risk factors of enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients and the effectiveness of preventive treatments: A prospective study

Effects of permissive hypocaloric vs standard enteral feeding on gastrointestinal function and outcomes in sepsis

Impact of early nutrition and feeding route on clinical outcomes of neurocritically ill patients

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients