Effectiveness of cladribine compared to fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Izanne Roos,Sifat Sharmin,Charles Malpas,Serkan Ozakbas,Jeannette Lechner-Scott,Suzanne Hodgkinson,Raed Alroughani,Sara Eichau Madueño,Cavit Boz,Anneke van der Walt,Helmut Butzkueven,Katherine Buzzard,Olga Skibina,Matteo Foschi,Francois Grand'Maison,Nevin John,Pierre Grammond,Murat Terzi,Julie Prévost,Michael Barnett,Guy Laureys,Liesbeth Van Hijfte,Jose Luis Sanchez-Menoyo,Yolanda Blanco,Jiwon Oh,Pamela McCombe,Cristina Ramo Tello,Aysun Soysal,Alexandre Prat,Pierre Duquette,Bassem I Yamout,Samia Khoury,Vincent van Pesch,Richard Macdonell,Maria José Sá,Mark Slee,Jens Kuhle,Davide Maimone,Daniele LA Spitaleri,Barbara Willekens,Abdallah Al Asmi,Emma Tallantyre,Neil P Robertson,Alasdair Coles,J William L Brown,Tomas Kalincik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241267211
Abstract:Background: Comparisons between cladribine and other potent immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) are lacking. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of cladribine against fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting MS. Methods: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with cladribine, fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab were identified in the global MSBase cohort and two additional UK centres. Patients were followed for ⩾6/12 and had ⩾3 in-person disability assessments. Patients were matched using propensity score. Four pairwise analyses compared annualised relapse rates (ARRs) and disability outcomes. Results: The eligible cohorts consisted of 853 (fingolimod), 464 (natalizumab), 1131 (ocrelizumab), 123 (alemtuzumab) or 493 (cladribine) patients. Cladribine was associated with a lower ARR than fingolimod (0.07 vs. 0.12, p = 0.006) and a higher ARR than natalizumab (0.10 vs. 0.06, p = 0.03), ocrelizumab (0.09 vs. 0.05, p = 0.008) and alemtuzumab (0.17 vs. 0.04, p < 0.001). Compared to cladribine, the risk of disability worsening did not differ in patients treated with fingolimod (hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-2.47) or alemtuzumab (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.26-2.07), but was lower for patients treated with natalizumab (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.94) and ocrelizumab (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.78). There was no evidence for a difference in disability improvement. Conclusion: Cladribine is an effective therapy that can be viewed as a step up in effectiveness from fingolimod, but is less effective than the most potent intravenous MS therapies.