Therapeutic choices and disease activity after 2 years of treatment with cladribine: An Italian multicenter study (CladStop)

Irene Schiavetti,Alessio Signori,Angela Albanese,Jessica Frau,Eleonora Cocco,Lorena Lorefice,Sonia di Lemme,Roberta Fantozzi,Diego Centonze,Doriana Landi,Girolama Marfia,Elisabetta Signoriello,Giacomo Lus,Chiara Zecca,Claudio Gobbi,Rosa Iodice,Leonardo Malimpensa,Cinzia Cordioli,Diana Ferraro,Francesca Ruscica,Livia Pasquali,Anna Repice,Paolo Immovilli,Maria Teresa Ferrò,Simona Bonavita,Massimiliano Di Filippo,Gianmarco Abbadessa,Flora Govone,Maria Pia Sormani,CladStop study group,Massimiliano Di Filippo,Martina Cardi,Emanuele Cassano,Antonella Conte,Sonia Di Lemme,Elena Di Sabatino,Carolina Gabri Nicoletti,Luigi Grimaldi,Luigi Lavorgna,Giuseppina Miele,Francesca Napoli,Carmine Siniscalchi,Stefano Tozza,Francesca Vitetta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16250
2024-03-30
European Journal of Neurology
Abstract:Background and purpose Cladribine tablets, a purine analogue antimetabolite, offer a unique treatment regimen, involving short courses at the start of the first and second year, with no further treatment needed in years 3 and 4. However, comprehensive evidence regarding patient outcomes beyond the initial 24 months of cladribine treatment is limited. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled 204 patients with multiple sclerosis who had completed the 2‐year course of cladribine treatment. The primary outcomes were therapeutic choices and clinical disease activity assessed by annualized relapse rate after the 2‐year treatment course. Results A total of 204 patients were enrolled; most patients (75.4%) did not initiate new treatments in the 12 months postcladribine. The study found a significant reduction in annualized relapse rate at the 12‐month follow‐up after cladribine completion compared to the year prior to starting therapy (0.07 ± 0.25 vs. 0.82 ± 0.80, p
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?