Abstract:The article presents empirical data concerning the meaning of freedom and autonomy in the emotional-cognitive processes that govern pre-suicidal decision-making. The data is derived from a qualitative interview study conducted between December 2012 and July 2014 on an intensive care unit in Germany. Twelve patients (three male, nine female; seven with pre-diagnosed mental illness) who had attempted suicide by intoxication were included. The narrative biographical approach chosen allows to capture the individuals' experiences preceding their decisions for suicide and provides insights into the biographical contexts of their decisions. Most strikingly, the narratives underline the essential importance of interpersonal relationships as well as an ambivalent reciprocity of cognitive and emotional processes in pre-suicidal reasoning, while ideas of autonomy and decision-making capacity traditionally address rational deliberation. This divergence between patients' subjective perceptions and scholarly conceptualisations of autonomous suicide is in line with increasing criticism of conventional approaches, given that they ignore essential elements of human existence, such as values, emotions, and social interdependence. The empirical findings suggest moving beyond the idea of autonomous decision-making for suicide as a rational procedure and instead conceptualise the pre-suicidal decision-making process as a highly emotional phenomenon within a relational context. Acknowledging that suicidality is not only linked to cognitive considerations but also intertwined with or predominantly controlled by emotional dimensions, such as despair, crisis, and marginalisation, we argue that further evaluation tools are required to address suicidality in all its facets. In moving beyond the mere consideration of cognitive functions, this approach is particularly suitable for representing the reality of persons with mental illness. This provides urgently needed guidance for clinical practice, considering that the latest German jurisdiction on physician-assisted suicide holds that the right to a self-determined death cannot be refused unless an acute psychiatric condition directly caused the suicide wish.

When Suicide is not a Self -Killing: Advance Decisions and Psychological Discontinuity—Part I

When Suicide is not a Self -Killing: Advance Decisions and Psychological Discontinuity—Part II

Reasoning for autonomous suicide? A qualitative approach to pre-suicidal decision-making

Physician Aid-in-Dying and Suicide Prevention in Psychiatry: A Moral Crisis?

On Wilkinson: unpacking Parfit, paternalism and the primacy of autonomy in contemporary bioethics

Choosing death in unjust conditions: hope, autonomy and harm reduction

Non-Psychiatric Treatment Refusal in Patients with Depression: How Should Surrogate Decision-Makers Represent the Patient's Authentic Wishes?

What is suicide? Classifying self-killings

Suicide decision‐making: Differences in proximal considerations between individuals who aborted and attempted suicide

Words Matter: Why Distinguishing Medical Aid in Dying From Suicide Should Matter to a Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrist

Euthanasia and End-of-Life Decisions: From the Empirical Turn to Moral Intuitionism

Towards an alternative approach to personhood in the end of life questions

‘In a twilight world’? Judging the value of life for the minimally conscious patient

Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value

Advance Medical Decision-Making Differs Across First- and Third-Person Perspectives

From involuntary incarceration to Medically Assisted Suicide: Mental illness, suicide and autonomous judgement

Coping with Moral Dilemmas in German Criminal Law Theory and Justice: Classical Cases and Modern Variants

Grief and the Inconsolation of Philosophy

Understanding the psychodynamics of the pathway to suicide

In Defense of "Physician-Assisted Suicide": Toward (and Back to) a Transparent, Destigmatizing Debate

Unintended Intrauterine Death and Preterm Delivery: What Does Philosophy Have to Offer?