A systematic review of the sex differences in risk factors for knee osteoarthritis

Ingrid A Szilagyi,Jan H Waarsing,Joyce B J van Meurs,Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra,Dieuwke Schiphof
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac688
2023-06-01
Abstract:Objectives: Previous systematic reviews focused on the evidence of common risk factors for knee OA (KOA); however, the effect and strength of association between risk factors and KOA might be different between the two sexes. The aim of the present systematic review was to determine the current evidence on sex differences in the association between risk factors and KOA and their prevalence. Methods: We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Web of Science. A methodological quality assessment was conducted independently by two researchers according to an adapted version of the standardized set of criteria known as the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). The NOS, a star system, was converted to three categories of quality. Results: In total, 27 studies reported sex-specific risk estimates on several risk factors for KOA. Out of the 22 longitudinal cohort studies (except one nested case-control), 12 were of good quality and 10 were of fair quality. The five cross-sectional studies consisted of one of good, three of fair and one of poor quality. There was an indication of sex differences in risk factors leading to higher risk of KOA: high BMI, alcohol consumption, atherosclerosis and high vitamin E levels in women, and high physical activity, soft drink consumption and abdominal obesity in men. Knee injury, high blood pressure and low step rate seem to affect both women and men. Conclusion: More good quality studies are needed to assess sex differences in risk factors for KOA, especially for symptomatic/clinical OA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?