OPTIKNEE 2022: consensus recommendations to optimise knee health after traumatic knee injury to prevent osteoarthritis
Jackie L Whittaker,Adam G Culvenor,Carsten Bogh Juhl,Bjørnar Berg,Alessio Bricca,Stephanie Rose Filbay,Pætur Holm,Erin Macri,Anouk P Urhausen,Clare L Ardern,Andrea M Bruder,Garrett S Bullock,Allison M Ezzat,Michael Girdwood,Melissa Haberfield,Mick Hughes,Lina Holm Ingelsrud,Karim M Khan,Christina Y Le,Justin M Losciale,Matilde Lundberg,Maxi Miciak,Britt Elin Øiestad,Brooke Patterson,Anu M Räisänen,Søren T Skou,Jonas Bloch Thorlund,Clodagh Toomey,Linda K Truong,Belle L van Meer,Thomas James West,James Justin Young,L Stefan Lohmander,Carolyn Emery,May Arna Risberg,Marienke van Middelkoop,Ewa M Roos,Kay M Crossley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-106299
Abstract:The goal of the OPTIKNEE consensus is to improve knee and overall health, to prevent osteoarthritis (OA) after a traumatic knee injury. The consensus followed a seven-step hybrid process. Expert groups conducted 7 systematic reviews to synthesise the current evidence and inform recommendations on the burden of knee injuries; risk factors for post-traumatic knee OA; rehabilitation to prevent post-traumatic knee OA; and patient-reported outcomes, muscle function and functional performance tests to monitor people at risk of post-traumatic knee OA. Draft consensus definitions, and clinical and research recommendations were generated, iteratively refined, and discussed at 6, tri-weekly, 2-hour videoconferencing meetings. After each meeting, items were finalised before the expert group (n=36) rated the level of appropriateness for each using a 9-point Likert scale, and recorded dissenting viewpoints through an anonymous online survey. Seven definitions, and 8 clinical recommendations (who to target, what to target and when, rehabilitation approach and interventions, what outcomes to monitor and how) and 6 research recommendations (research priorities, study design considerations, what outcomes to monitor and how) were voted on. All definitions and recommendations were rated appropriate (median appropriateness scores of 7-9) except for two subcomponents of one clinical recommendation, which were rated uncertain (median appropriateness score of 4.5-5.5). Varying levels of evidence supported each recommendation. Clinicians, patients, researchers and other stakeholders may use the definitions and recommendations to advocate for, guide, develop, test and implement person-centred evidence-based rehabilitation programmes following traumatic knee injury, and facilitate data synthesis to reduce the burden of knee post-traumatic knee OA.