Abstract:Stroke is the leading cause of permanent impairment and disability. Pending a radical cure, patients recovering from stroke will continue to require study and innovation. Perhaps the need for advances in treating stroke recovery grows more urgent because of the increased incidence and prevalence of stroke. These increases reflect greater life expectancy, aging of the baby boomer generation, and improved medical treatment of the complications caused by acute stroke. Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that treatment of patients with stroke in a specialized stroke unit cause lower mortality rates, shorter hospitalization, and greater likelihood of discharge home. Most importantly, these positive outcomes persist over a 10-year follow-up period [1–5]. With stroke rehabilitation units established as a standard of care, now is the time to focus on the mechanism of neurological recovery and attempt to use this knowledge to devise new strategies for the recovering stroke patient. The current standard of care in stroke units depends as much on the positive influence created by interdisciplinary approaches as it does on a particular protocol. Compassion and a reliance on natural recovery have served as the basis for these recovery treatment protocols for a long time. The challenge is to compare these unproven protocols to rational, novel therapies evolved from a theoretical and experimental base that use the randomized controlled trial design. The improved therapy must achieve statistically increased outcomes and also enhance quality of life. Perhaps with luck and ingenuity, positive outcome data with real-world effects will also meet the administrative challenges of cost efficiency. Most survivors of stroke experience significant and permanent physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments that translate into functional disabilities. However, current interdisciplinary treatment programs focus more on disability reduction than on impairment. Adapting and learning compensatory techniques to reduce disability—for example, using the unimpaired arm and hand—lead to relatively rapid functional response compared to impairment reduction techniques. Disability reduction with realworld outcome differences remains the goal of any rehabilitation experience, but hasty compensation for a disability may engender a pattern of disuse in the impaired limbs that blunts recovery and mutes the potential for future reduction in impairment and future disability reduction [6]. Some current studies take a balanced approach, focusing on impairment and disability outcomes while using techniques of task-specific training to influence impairment reduction [7–12]. Task-specific training breaks a complex functional movement into component parts, and teaching individual components of a movement with intensive repetition and guidance might improve motor outcome. In the clinic, renewed interest in Bruce T. Volpe, MD Professor, Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Burke Medical Research Institute

[Permanent pacing in childhood: a review of 11 years of experience].

Long-term Safety and Feasibility of Permanent His Bundle Pacing

Cardiac Pacemaker Survey-Twenty Hospitals Pacemaker Implantation Registry in China

Long-term outcome of permanent epicardial pacemaker implantation in neonates: Experience from an Indian center

Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.

Feasibility and Safety of Epicardial Pacemaker Implantation in Infants and Children

Cardiac pacing in the 1980s: treatment and techniques in transition

Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacing in Paediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Block or Sinus Node Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Looking out for science policy.

[Effectiveness Investigation on Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in 10 Infants and Toddlers].

"Stroke, stroke": a coxswain's call for more work and more innovation.

Eight year Follow-Up Data on a Leadless Pacing System Real life experience in comparison to data of the prospective trial

Reversal of Right Ventricular Pacemaker Syndrome by Transthoracic Implantation of Left Ventricular Epicardial Pacemaker in Children

Long-Term Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Bicaval Heart Transplant Recipients

Single-Chamber and Dual-Chamber Pacemaker Devices in Adults with Moderate and Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Single Tertiary Referral Center Experience

Time dependence of risks and benefits in pediatric primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy

Retrospective analysis of indications and complications related to implantation of permanent pacemaker: 25 years of experience in 31 dogs

Long-term prognosis of patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker indication in three referral cardiac centers in Cameroon: Insights from the National pacemaker registry

Emerging pacemaker technology for small children

Analysis of complications after pacemaker implantation 82 cases

Allostery, cooperativity, and different structural states in F-actin.