Abstract:OBJECT Patients, practitioners, payers, and regulators are advocating for reform in how medical advances are evaluated. Because surgery does not adhere to a standardized developmental pathway, how the medical community accepts a procedure remains unclear. The authors developed a new model, using publication data and patterns, that quantifies this process. Using this technique, the authors identified common archetypes and influences on neurosurgical progress from idea inception to acceptance. METHODS Seven neurosurgical procedures developed in the past 15-25 years were used as developmental case studies (endovascular coil, deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-l-nitrosourea wafer, and 3 radiosurgery procedures), and the literature on each topic was evaluated. A new metric the authors termed "progressive scholarly acceptance" (PSA) was used as an end point for community acceptance. PSA was reached when the number of investigations that refine or improve a procedure eclipsed the total number of reports assessing initial efficacy. Report characteristics, including the number of patients studied, study design, and number of authoring groups from the first report to the point of PSA, were assessed. RESULTS Publication data implicated factors that had an outsized influence on acceptance. First, procedural accessibility to investigators was found to influence the number of reports, number of patients studied, and number of authoring groups contributing. Barriers to accessibility included target disease rarity, regulatory restrictions, and cost. Second, the ease or difficulty in applying a randomized controlled trial had an impact on study design. Based on these 2 factors, 3 developmental archetypes were characterized to generally describe the development of surgery. CONCLUSIONS Common surgical development archetypes can be described based on factors that impact investigative methods, data accumulation, and ultimate acceptance by society. The approach and proposed terminologies in this report could inform future procedural development as well as any attempts to regulate surgical innovation.

New product ideas: from the mind to the market

Developing a new treatment device: How to get an idea to the marketplace

Bringing Your Idea to the Market: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons

How to Start a Biomedical Device Company: Physicians Can Lead the Team Effort

Ten steps to transform ideas into product innovations: An interdisciplinary collaboration between nursing and engineering

Requirements to bring a medical device to market

Developing a new product development & launch process. Case: pharmaceutical market

A Study on the Marketing Strategy for a New Product Development and Launch in the Market

Starting a Medical Technology Venture as a Young Academic Innovator or Student Entrepreneur

Effective Strategies to Patent Plastic Surgery Ideas and Intellectual Property

Evaluating innovation. Part 2: Development in neurosurgery

Application of the Stanford Biodesign Framework in Healthcare Innovation Training and Commercialization of Market Appropriate Products: A Scoping Review

Nine Steps in the Entrepreneurial Journey for Academic Radiologists

Aligning Incentives for Surgical Innovation: Review of the Literature and Best Practices

Navigating challenges in new product development: Strategies for reducing failure rates in the medical device industry

Challenges experienced by pediatric nurses in the process of developing innovative products: A qualitative study

Crucial Business Model Elements for Medical Device Startup Companies in Emerging Markets

A qualitative study : clinical marketing strategies for medical devices innovations that increase adoption in the USA

Doctors as Device Manufacturers? Regulation of Clinician-Generated Innovation in the ICU

Case studies of innovative medical device companies from India: barriers and enablers to development

The new collaborative path in medical device development: the medical device innovation consortium