Abstract:Abstract In this study, we leveraged the high temporal resolution of EEG to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the flexible regulation of cognitive control that unfolds over different timescales. We measured behavioral and neural effects of color–word incongruency, as different groups of participants performed three different versions of color–word Stroop tasks in which the relative timing of the color and word features varied from trial to trial. For this purpose, we used a standard Stroop color identification task with equal congruent-to-incongruent proportions (50%/50%), along with two versions of the “Reverse Stroop” word identification tasks, for which we manipulated the incongruency proportion (50%/50% and 80%/20%). Two canonical ERP markers of neural processing of stimulus incongruency, the frontocentral negative polarity incongruency wave (NINC) and the late positive component (LPC), were evoked across the various conditions. Results indicated that color–word incongruency interacted with the relative feature timing, producing greater neural and behavioral effects when the task-irrelevant stimulus preceded the target, but still significant effects when it followed. Additionally, both behavioral and neural incongruency effects were reduced by nearly half in the word identification task (Reverse Stroop 50/50) relative to the color identification task (Stroop 50/50), with these effects essentially fully recovering when incongruent trials appeared only infrequently (Reverse Stroop 80/20). Across the conditions, NINC amplitudes closely paralleled RTs, indicating this component is sensitive to the overall level of stimulus conflict. In contrast, LPC amplitudes were largest with infrequent incongruent trials, suggesting a possible readjustment role when proactive control is reduced. These findings thus unveil distinct control mechanisms that unfold over time in response to conflicting stimulus input under different contexts.

Transfer of learned cognitive control settings within and between tasks

Between-task transfer of item-specific control is replicable and extends to novel conditions.

Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning

EXPRESS: Transfer of cognitive control adjustments within and between speakers

Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect

Training Reveals The Sources Of Stroop And Flanker Interference Effects

From eyes to hands: Transfer of learning in the Simon task across motor effectors

Transfer of statistical learning between tasks.

The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task

When stimulus variability accelerates the learning of task knowledge in adults and school-aged children

Mechanisms underlying flexible adaptation of cognitive control: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence in a flanker task

Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.

Transfer of visual perceptual learning over a task-irrelevant feature through feature-invariant representations: Behavioral experiments and model simulations

A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes

Attention Control Training and Transfer Effects on Cognitive Tasks

Beyond stimulus–response rules: Task sets incorporate information about performance difficulty.

The Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control Processes in the Human Brain

One-shot stimulus-control associations generalize over different stimulus viewpoints and exemplars

Flexibility by association? No evidence for an influence of cue–transition associations on voluntary task switching.

Context Modulates Early Stimulus Processing when Resolving Stimulus-response Conflict

No evidence for cross-paradigm transfer of abstract task knowledge in adults and school-aged children