Abstract:Public administration in Africa has its own specific features for at least two reasons. First, African societies are not organized along the lines of competing interests driven by their grounding in the economic production process. These societies have never been subject to an agrarian revolution, let alone an industrial one, that allows for the evolution of a system of social stratification similar to what is found in economically developed countries. In the latter, society is shaped by the state, much of it in its own image. The second reason, therefore, is that the African state—the locus of public administration—is a foreign creation imposed on society without roots in the economy or society. This tends to make its governance capricious and shaped foremost by political battles over how rents and privileges are shared among groups that come together for reasons of consumption rather than production. This is a general feature of the African scene, but it is qualified by a variable colonial legacy and a postindependence development experience. Former British and French colonies differ because of the legal systems they inherited—the former the common law tradition, the latter the Napoleonic civil law apparatus. This difference is important in shaping not only public administration but also the wider political outlook—a factor that affects inter-African cooperation. Since independence, public administration in these countries has been influenced by international and domestic pressures to accelerate development and promote democratic governance. This postindependence experience has been variable, some having managed to steer clear of violence, others having suffered political breakdowns. The African story of public administration since independence is diverse and representative of both successes and failures. Three countries—Botswana, Kenya, and Rwanda—are of special interest because they indicate different pathways that other countries in the region may follow to improve their governance and public administration.

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN A GLOBALIZED ASIA: INTELLECTUAL IDENTITIES, CHALLENGES, AND PROSPECTS

Comparative Public Administration in a Globalized World: Moving Beyond Standard Assumptions Toward Increased Understanding

Comparative Studies in Public Administration: Intellectual Challenges and Alternative Perspectives

The Case for Public Administration with a Global Perspective

On the “Chineseness” and “Publicness” of Chinese Public Administration

Reflections on public administration education with a case of Bangladesh

Deconcentrated global governance, transnational administration, and the public administration discipline

Notes on Contemporary Public Administration Theories in the West

Governance and public administration in China

What Should Be Concerned:On the Big Question of Public Administration

Special issue introduction: integrating Asia Pacific influences and public management research

African Public Administration

Administration: Reconsideration of the Theory of Relation Between a Country and Its Citizen Society

China's Public Administration Education:Past,Present,and Future

On Three Public Administration Paradigms and Their Transformation

China's Public Administration Discipline:A Critical Thinking Towards Localization

Path‐Dependent Public Servants: Comparing the Influence of Traditions on Administrative Behavior in Developing Asia

The Fruits of Diversity and Globalization: Participation and Contributions of East-Asian Scholars in Public Administration

Public Administration for Development: Trends and the Way Forward

Development and Dynamics of State Administration in Indonesia: The Struggle of the Discourse of the “State” Administration vis a vis the “Public” Administration

An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries