Abstract:We endorse the recent editorial recommendations by Frerk and Lee [1]. The problems pertaining to difficult airway management frequently stem from the heterogeneity of airway device research method and the inconsistency in airway training. Our department has therefore attempted to set-up a ‘firewall’ against the onslaught of new airway devices from outside and at the same time consolidate our teaching programme of airway skills from within. What defines a ‘difficult airway’, ‘difficult laryngoscopy’, ‘difficult intubation’ and ‘difficult mask ventilation’ is frequently ill-defined in the literature [2] and inconsistent between individuals with the same level of anaesthetic experience [3]. Similar to Frerk and Lee we are concerned with the plethora of airway devices. It is our department’s approach not to accept any new device unless it is loaned for a period of evaluation (usually at least 4 weeks). This allows the device to be assessed over period of time with and without company representatives being present. During this period, anaesthetic staff with a difficult airway management portfolio assess the device in a number of clinical scenarios. These scenarios usually include morbidly obese patients, simulated manual in-line stabilisation of the neck and patients presenting for airway surveillance following neck irradiation for laryngeal carcinoma. One of the important aspects of this assessment is whether the device may be used with minimal training. This stage of the evaluation is subjective and focuses on the length of the device’s learning curve and whether frequent usage is required to maintain proficiency. Also the ability of staff to successfully trouble-shoot device problems is an important feature. If the device proves to be easy to use then it is recommended for further evaluation focusing on other issues such as cost, reliability and success rate. Our department aims for a limited number of devices to be introduced based on their user-friendliness and versatility within the scope of various difficult airway scenarios. There is a diminishing skill base amongst trainees due to reductions in working hours and the growing use of supraglottic devices as an alternative to tracheal intubation [4–6]. Training difficulties are compounded by the use of manikins which replicate a ‘normal’ airway. Some commercially available manikins may simulate some conditions such as tongue and pharyngeal swelling, limited neck movement and laryngospasm. However, there is an lack of manikins specifically designed to replicate some of the common causes of the difficult airway such as morbid obesity, short neck, prominent upper incisors or retrognathia. This is an issue we would like to see addressed with the help of the manikin manufacturers. Our department is instituting a priority list for airway teaching based on practical airway skills, with regular assessment and proficiency demonstration. This starts with simple mask ventilation, direct laryngoscopy (with the Macintosh blade), supraglottic airway insertion and emergency surgical airway for the new trainees. As the trainee progresses they are introduced to more advanced techniques in a step-wise process including the intubating laryngeal mask, fibreoptic bronchoscopy ⁄ Aintree catheter technique, awake and asleep fibreoptic bronchsocopy as well as the use of alternative laryngoscope blades (straight and McCoy). We have also introduced the following goals for our department. • Furthering difficult airway management through research and product assessment. • Providing a sound teaching curriculum based on a difficult airway diagnosis [7] followed by a clinically relevant algorithm using a limited number of user-friendly airway devices or manoeuvres. • Standarisation of all difficult airway trolleys both in the operating theatres and in off-site anaesthetic areas with a clear understanding of both the strengths and weaknesses of this equipment in various difficult airway scenarios [8, 9]. This action reflects an attempt by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthesists, with support from the Airway Management Special Interest Group, to standardise difficult airway trolley equipment in this region.

What to Measure When Determining Orthotic Needs in Children With Down Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Heterogeneity and predictors of the effects of AI assistance on radiologists

Reporting radiographers' interaction with Artificial Intelligence-How do different forms of AI feedback impact trust and decision switching?

The impact of AI suggestions on radiologists’ decisions: a pilot study of explainability and attitudinal priming interventions in mammography examination

The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms

An experimental machine learning study investigating the decision-making process of students and qualified radiographers when interpreting radiographic images

Prospective study of AI-assisted prediction of breast malignancies in physical health examinations: role of off-the-shelf AI software and comparison to radiologist performance

The radiologist as a physician - artificial intelligence as a way to overcome tension between the patient, technology, and referring physicians - a narrative review

Artificial intelligence as diagnostic aiding tool in cases of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3: the results of retrospective multi-center cohort study

Difficult airway management – a glass half empty

Familiarity, confidence and preference of artificial intelligence feedback and prompts by Australian breast cancer screening readers

The virtual reference radiologist: comprehensive AI assistance for clinical image reading and interpretation

Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms

The Impact of Expectation Management and Model Transparency on Radiologists' Trust and Utilization of AI Recommendations for Lung Nodule Assessment on Computed Tomography: Simulated Use Study

Canavan disease: CT and MR imaging of the brain.

Engaging with artificial intelligence in mammography screening: Swedish breast radiologists' views on trust, information and expertise

Assessing the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Assistance for Prostate MRI: A Two‐Center Study Involving Radiologists With Different Experience Levels

Radiology Residents’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Effect of AI Explanations on Human Perceptions of Patient-Facing AI-Powered Healthcare Systems

Patient Characteristics Impact Performance of AI Algorithm in Interpreting Negative Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Studies

Interactive Explainable Deep Learning Model Informs Prostate Cancer Diagnosis at MRI