How to avoid mistakes in treating adsorption isotherm data (liquid and solid phases): Some comments about correctly using Radke-Prausnitz nonlinear model and Langmuir equilibrium constant

Hai Nguyen Tran,Jean-Claude Bollinger,Eder C Lima,Ruey-Shin Juang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116475
2023-01-01
Abstract:Two flaws in concepts were identified and discussed in the paper ("Removal of Pb(II) from contaminated waters using cellulose sulfate/chitosan aerogel: Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies". J. Environ. Manag. 286, 112167; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112167). In the literature, the Radke-Prausnitz model is expressed in different forms, but some of them are incorrect. The first flaw is related to the nonlinear form of the Radke-Prausnitz model. The nonlinear form of this three parameters model is expressed correctly as [Formula: see text] . The units of two parameters are ARP (L/kg) and BRP [(mol/kg)/(mol/L)β] by considering qe (mol/kg) and Ce (mol/L). The limitation for its exponent is 0≤ β ≤ 1. This model is developed by two authors (Radke and Prausnitz). The correct paper (DOI: 10.1021/i160044a003) cited as reference of this model is "Radke, C.J., Prausnitz, J.M., 1972. Adsorption of organic solutes from dilute aqueous solution of activated carbon. Ind. Eng. Chem. 11, 445-451". The second is the misconception about the unit of the Langmuir constant (KL; L/mg). The correct unit of KL is litre per milligram of adsorbate (i.e., Pb ions), not litre per milligram of adsorbent (the cellulose sulfate/chitosan aerogel material as reported by Najaflou and co-workers. They proposed a new equation [KL (L/mg) × m/V (mg/L)] to convert the Langmuir constant and then applied it to calculate the thermodynamic parameters of the adsorption process. The m/V is a solid/liquid ratio (g/L or kg/L). However, this conversion and application are mistakes that were thoroughly discussed in this paper. The correction is KEqo=1γAdsorbate×KLLmol×ComolL, with C° (1 mol/L by definition) being the standard state of solute and γAdsorbate (dimensionless) being the activity coefficient of adsorbate in solution. To avoid unexpected mistakes, the present authors suggest that researchers should have a correct citation (citing the original reference instead of using secondary references) and check the consistency of units (i.e., the constants of adsorption models) carefully.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?