The conflicting meaning of transparency.

N. Blow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2144/000113726

2011-09-01

BioTechniques

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Transparency: a two‐way mirror?

Dominique Bessire

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290510591272

2005-05-01

International Journal of Social Economics

Abstract:Purpose Transparency is assumed to improve markets' efficiency, to enhance better corporate governance and finally, to ensure moralisation of business life. The paper aims to the realities that prevailing discourses on transparency dissimulate. Design/methodology/approach First, a genealogical method is used to explore the theoretical roots, which underpin claims for a greater transparency (reduction of information asymmetry in academic discourses). Second, the analogies between mainstream theories on corporate governance (which legitimate the demand for transparency) and the Panopticon, the famous architecture conceived by Bentham are pinpointed. Finally, the reflections developed by philosophers such as Ricoeur and Henriot on ethics are exploited to explain why transparency is unable to produce the expected effects. Findings First, discourses on transparency often conceal reinsurance manœuvres and power struggles. Second, transparency appears as a modernised manifestation of panopticism: a common base (the concept of utility), the same fundamental assumption (the opportunistic nature of man) and a similar answer (discipline). More generally, panopticism and discourses on transparency are embedded in the same utilitarian philosophy which does not grant any space either for responsibility or for ethics and therefore, favours generalised amorality. Research limitations/implications As a consequence it is suggested that one should explore the possibility of elaborating an economics theory, which would get rid of the concept of utility and a theory of the enterprise, which would take as key concepts creativity and trust, instead of opportunism. Originality/value Through the deconstruction of prevailing discourses on transparency, the paper points to the intrinsic anti‐humanistic character of mainstream economics and organisation theories and suggests alternative issues. It therefore may contribute to both enlightenment and emancipatory aims (in the Habermasian sense).
The Multi-Faceted Concept of Transparency

Jens Forssbbck,Lars Oxelheim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2405951

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Transparency has become a catchword and in the economic-political debate is often seen as a universal remedy for all sorts of problems. In this paper, we analyze and discuss the meaning and use of the concept of transparency in economic research. We look for common denominators across different areas where the concept is used, and find that transparency in essence is about reductions in information asymmetries, and therefore entails the transfer of information from a sender to a receiver. Transparency goes beyond mere information disclosure in that it has a demand-side dimension: the information transferred should be trustworthy and have a value to the receiver. We emphasize the distinction between ex ante transparency – related to predictability – and ex post transparency – related to accountability. In economics, increased transparency is mostly rationalized on grounds of improving efficiency, but sometimes transparency is properly viewed simply as a right to know. Complementarities between different types of transparency are pervasive, and its causes and effects typically co-determined – i.e. transparency is endogenous. As a means to improve competitiveness and economic growth, transparency of economic policy and corporate as well as institutional transparency interact. We challenge the view that more transparency is always better and argue for concave net benefits and the existence of optimal transparency, but optimality varies across policy areas, institutional settings, industries and individual firms.
The transparency trap

Ethan Bernstein

Abstract:To promote accountability, productivity, and shared learning, many organizations create open work environments and gather reams of data on how individuals spend their time. A few years ago, HBS professor Ethan Bernstein set out to find empirical evidence that such approaches improve organizational performance. What he discovered is that this kind of transparency often has an unintended consequence: It can leave employees feeling vulnerable and exposed. When that happens, they conceal any conduct that deviates from the norm so that they won't have to explain it. Unrehearsed, experimental behaviors sometimes stop altogether. But Bernstein also discovered organizations that had established zones of privacy within open environments by setting four types of boundaries: around teams, between feedback and evaluation, between decision rights and improvement rights, and around periods of experimentation. Moreover, across several studies, the companies that had done all this were the ones that consistently got the most creative, efficient, and thoughtful work from their employees. Bernstein's conclusion? By balancing transparency and privacy, organizations can capture the benefits of both, and encourage just the right amount of "positive deviance" needed to increase innovation and productivity.
Transparency as Ideology, Ideology as Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony

Jorge I. Valdovinos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0059

2018-12-01

Open Cultural Studies

Abstract:Abstract Along with the increasing commodification of all aspects of culture and the persistent aestheticisation of everyday life under late capitalism, there is an equally increasing longing for objectivity, immediacy, and trust. As the mediation of our everyday experiences augments, a generalised feeling of mistrust in institutions reigns; the sense of a need to bypass them increases, and the call for more “transparency” intensifies. As transparency manages to bypass critical examination, the term becomes a source of tacit social consensus. This paper argues that the proliferation of contemporary discourses favouring transparency has become one of the fundamental vehicles for the legitimation of neoliberal hegemony, due to transparency's own conceptual structure-a formula with a particularly sharp capacity for translating structures of power into structures of feeling. While the ideology of transparency promises a movement towards the abolition of unequal flows of information at the basis of relations of power and exploitation, it simultaneously sustains a regime of hyper-visibility based on asymmetrical mechanisms of accountability for the sake of profit. The solution is not “more” transparency or “better” information, but to critically examine the emancipatory potential of transparency at the conceptual level, inspecting the architecture that supports its parasitic logic.
Unmanaged Transparency in a Digital Society: Swiss army knife or double-edged sword?

Georg Reischauer,Leopold Ringel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221106329

2022-06-23

Organization Studies

Abstract:Organization Studies, Ahead of Print. Facing increasing demands for transparency, more and more organizations have embraced managed forms of information disclosure that rely on digital technologies. However, when doing so, they tend to create an idealized self-presentation for their audiences. Aggravated by these attempts to undermine 'true openness', calls for a 'hands-off' approach to information disclosure – also known as unmanaged transsparency – have grown louder. Following this development, the paper conceptualizes organizations as sites of managed and unmanaged transparency practices and asks how these practices shape audience support and are affected by audiences. Empirically, we study a German political party from 2011 to 2017. Audiences initially supported the party's commitment to unmanaged transparency but soon withdrew their support. Members in executive positions reacted by enacting multiple managed transparency practices to change the party's negative public image. These efforts, however, were futile, and the party could not regain audience support. We theorize this dynamic in a framework that draws attention to the impact of (un)managed transparency and the organizational environment on audience support. Overall, our study suggests that unmanaged transparency in a digital society is more like a double-edged sword rather than a Swiss army knife: organizations might profit from its positive effects on the audience's support, but they also make themselves vulnerable by the high level of dissonance they put on display.

management
Varieties of transparency: exploring agency within AI systems

Gloria Andrada,Robert W. Clowes,Paul R. Smart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01326-6

2022-01-10

Abstract:AI systems play an increasingly important role in shaping and regulating the lives of millions of human beings across the world. Calls for greater transparency from such systems have been widespread. However, there is considerable ambiguity concerning what “transparency” actually means, and therefore, what greater transparency might entail. While, according to some debates, transparency requires seeing through the artefact or device, widespread calls for transparency imply seeing into different aspects of AI systems. These two notions are in apparent tension with each other, and they are present in two lively but largely disconnected debates. In this paper, we aim to further analyse what these calls for transparency entail, and in so doing, clarify the sorts of transparency that we should want from AI systems. We do so by offering a taxonomy that classifies different notions of transparency. After a careful exploration of the different varieties of transparency, we show how this taxonomy can help us to navigate various domains of human–technology interactions, and more usefully discuss the relationship between technological transparency and human agency. We conclude by arguing that all of these different notions of transparency should be taken into account when designing more ethically adequate AI systems.
"I had a solid theory before but it's falling apart": Polarizing Effects of Algorithmic Transparency

Aaron Springer,Steve Whittaker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.02163

2018-11-06

Abstract:The rise of machine learning has brought closer scrutiny to intelligent systems, leading to calls for greater transparency and explainable algorithms. We explore the effects of transparency on user perceptions of a working intelligent system for emotion detection. In exploratory Study 1, we observed paradoxical effects of transparency which improves perceptions of system accuracy for some participants while reducing accuracy perceptions for others. In Study 2, we test this observation using mixed methods, showing that the apparent transparency paradox can be explained by a mismatch between participant expectations and system predictions. We qualitatively examine this process, indicating that transparency can undermine user confidence by causing users to fixate on flaws when they already have a model of system operation. In contrast transparency helps if users lack such a model. Finally, we revisit the notion of transparency and suggest design considerations for building safe and successful machine learning systems based on our insights.

Human-Computer Interaction
Capturing and Articulating Transparency

Hamish Coates

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2873-1_3

2017-01-01

Abstract:With its growing economic and social role, higher education is the focus of increasingly broader public interest. Taking a position outside sector-specific contingencies offers fresh angles and perspectives for investigation and development. In this chapter I contend that transparency offers a very useful lens through which to take a better view of how higher education presents itself to society. I define and clarify the concept of transparency, examine why transparency matters, and examine the kind of indicators which might support effective external disclosures.
What Are You Hiding? Algorithmic Transparency and User Perceptions

Aaron Springer,Steve Whittaker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.03220

2018-12-08

Abstract:Extensive recent media focus has been directed towards the dark side of intelligent systems, how algorithms can influence society negatively. Often, transparency is proposed as a solution or step in the right direction. Unfortunately, research is mixed on the impact of transparency on the user experience. We examine transparency in the context an interactive system that predicts positive/negative emotion from a users' written text. We unify seemingly this contradictory research under a single model. We show that transparency can negatively affect accuracy perceptions for users whose expectations were not violated by the system's prediction; however, transparency also limits the damage done when users' expectations are violated by system predictions.

Human-Computer Interaction
Power distance belief and preference for transparency

Shalini Sarin Jain,Shailendra Pratap Jain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.016

IF: 11.3

2018-08-01

Journal of Business Research

Abstract:Transparency is a significant topic of debate in virtually every domain of human existence today. However, an understanding of conditions when it is preferred and when it is not is ambiguous. In this paper, we show that preference for transparency may be driven by people's power distance belief (PDB; Hofstede, 2001). Six studies in different domains—corporate transgressions, job interview settings, and corporate policy—reveal that people low in PDB express greater preference for transparency than those high in PDB. Findings are discussed from the perspective of the need for a clearer definition of transparency and a better understanding of the moderators of its preference.

business
Exploring transparency: a new framework for responsible business management

Denise Linda Parris,Jennifer L. Dapko,Richard Wade Arnold,Danny Arnold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-07-2015-0279

IF: 5.589

2016-02-08

Management Decision

Abstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically review the relevant literature on transparency, provide a comprehensive definition of transparency, and present a new framework for facilitating the adoption of transparency as an ethical cornerstone and pragmatic strategy for organizational responsible business management. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic literature review – a methodology adopted from medical sciences to eliminate research bias – was conducted. In doing so, the definitions, antecedents, and consequences of transparency are accessed and synthesized. Findings – Based upon this process transparency is defined as the extent to which a stakeholder perceives an organization provides learning opportunities about itself. A conceptual framework emerged from the data. It describes when transparency is especially important, what organizations can do to be more transparent, and the potential benefits of transparency. Practical implications – The transparency framework can be used as a guide for organizations attempting to change their behavior, image, and performance by adopting transparency as a value in their organization. In addition, the framework can be used to create and adopt a universal (i.e. industry-wide or even societal-wide) code of conduct. Furthermore, this review, definition, and framework provide a template for academics to advance transparency theory, and empirically test the construct’s application. Originality/value – As a new research field, transparency has lacked a concise definition as well as a conceptual framework. This is the first comprehensive summary of transparency. In addition, this study contributes to the methodology of evaluating construct definitions to advance empirical research.

management,business
From Universalizing Transparency to the Interplay of Transparency Matrices: Critical insights from the emerging social credit system in China

Hans Krause Hansen,Richard Weiskopf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619878474

2019-10-30

Organization Studies

Abstract:Building on research on organizational transparency and surveillance, mediated visibility and Foucauldian dispositional analytics, we develop the concept of transparency matrices for studying the interplay of mediating technologies and normative arrangements in the formation of transparency as a heterogeneous regime of visibility. Using the emerging and controversial social credit system in China as a critical case, we make two contributions. First, we enrich the conceptual vocabulary for the study of transparency as a dynamic multiplicity with varying power effects in different contexts, challenging in this way universalizing and otherwise reductive notions of transparency. Second, by emphasizing the operation of several coexisting matrices we provide a novel way of approaching the ‘post panoptic’ condition which can account not only for the power effects of different modalities of transparency, but also for the instabilities and potential openings that are generated by their interplay. Transparency is heterogeneous, irreducible to a single reality and open to future becoming.

management
Government transparency: paradoxes and dilemmas

Olumide Adeoye,Bing Ran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2181981

IF: 6.004

2023-03-02

Public Management Review

Abstract:Over the last three decades, the concept of government transparency has remained at the forefront of ongoing public debate. Using a systematic literature review of 470 articles on government transparency, this article identifies eight paradoxes and dilemmas related to government transparency including regulation, public safety, media interpretation, collaborative governance, functional ability, risk-taking, privacy, and personal interpretation. We then propose a comprehensive framework on how to reconcile these paradoxes and dilemmas towards achieving better transparency outcomes and ultimately effective public administration.

management,public administration
Progressive Disclosure

Aaron Springer,Steve Whittaker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3374218

IF: 3.4

2020-12-03

ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

Abstract:It is essential that users understand how algorithmic decisions are made, as we increasingly delegate important decisions to intelligent systems. Prior work has often taken a techno-centric approach, focusing on new computational techniques to support transparency. In contrast, this article employs empirical methods to better understand user reactions to transparent systems to motivate user-centric designs for transparent systems. We assess user reactions to transparency feedback in four studies of an emotional analytics system. In Study 1, users anticipated that a transparent system would perform better but unexpectedly retracted this evaluation after experience with the system. Study 2 offers an explanation for this paradox by showing that the benefits of transparency are context dependent. On the one hand, transparency can help users form a model of the underlying algorithm's operation. On the other hand, positive accuracy perceptions may be undermined when transparency reveals algorithmic errors. Study 3 explored real-time reactions to transparency. Results confirmed Study 2, in showing that users are both more likely to consult transparency information and to experience greater system insights when formulating a model of system operation. Study 4 used qualitative methods to explore real-time user reactions to motivate transparency design principles. Results again suggest that users may benefit from initially simplified feedback that hides potential system errors and assists users in building working heuristics about system operation. We use these findings to motivate new progressive disclosure principles for transparency in intelligent systems and discuss theoretical implications.

computer science, artificial intelligence
Should transparency be (in-)transparent? On monitoring aversion and cooperation in teams

Michalis Drouvelis,Johannes Jarke-Neuert,Johannes Lohse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.12621

2021-12-23

Abstract:Many modern organisations employ methods which involve monitoring of employees' actions in order to encourage teamwork in the workplace. While monitoring promotes a transparent working environment, the effects of making monitoring itself transparent may be ambiguous and have received surprisingly little attention in the literature. Using a novel laboratory experiment, we create a working environment in which first movers can (or cannot) observe second mover's monitoring at the end of a round. Our framework consists of a standard repeated sequential Prisoner's Dilemma, where the second mover can observe the choices made by first movers either exogenously or endogenously. We show that mutual cooperation occurs significantly more frequently when monitoring is made transparent. Additionally, our results highlight the key role of conditional cooperators (who are more likely to monitor) in promoting teamwork. Overall, the observed cooperation enhancing effects are due to monitoring actions that carry information about first movers who use it to better screen the type of their co-player and thereby reduce the risk of being exploited.

General Economics,Applications
Modeling Disclosive Transparency in NLP Application Descriptions

Michael Saxon,Sharon Levy,Xinyi Wang,Alon Albalak,William Yang Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.153

2021-09-11

Abstract:Broader disclosive transparency$-$truth and clarity in communication regarding the function of AI systems$-$is widely considered desirable. Unfortunately, it is a nebulous concept, difficult to both define and quantify. This is problematic, as previous work has demonstrated possible trade-offs and negative consequences to disclosive transparency, such as a confusion effect, where "too much information" clouds a reader's understanding of what a system description means. Disclosive transparency's subjective nature has rendered deep study into these problems and their remedies difficult. To improve this state of affairs, We introduce neural language model-based probabilistic metrics to directly model disclosive transparency, and demonstrate that they correlate with user and expert opinions of system transparency, making them a valid objective proxy. Finally, we demonstrate the use of these metrics in a pilot study quantifying the relationships between transparency, confusion, and user perceptions in a corpus of real NLP system descriptions.

Computation and Language,Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction
How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface

René F. Kizilcec

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858402

2016-05-07

Abstract:The rising prevalence of algorithmic interfaces, such as curated feeds in online news, raises new questions for designers, scholars, and critics of media. This work focuses on how transparent design of algorithmic interfaces can promote awareness and foster trust. A two-stage process of how transparency affects trust was hypothesized drawing on theories of information processing and procedural justice. In an online field experiment, three levels of system transparency were tested in the high-stakes context of peer assessment. Individuals whose expectations were violated (by receiving a lower grade than expected) trusted the system less, unless the grading algorithm was made more transparent through explanation. However, providing too much information eroded this trust. Attitudes of individuals whose expectations were met did not vary with transparency. Results are discussed in terms of a dual process model of attitude change and the depth of justification of perceived inconsistency. Designing for trust requires balanced interface transparency - not too little and not too much.

Computer Science,Psychology
Pay Transparency: Advancing Theory and Empirical Knowledge

Alexandra Arnold,Ingrid Fulmer,Jason D. Shaw,Valeria Alterman,Peter Bamberger,Elena Belogolovsky,Tamara Montag-Smit,Tae-Youn Park,Junqi Shi,Brandon Smit,Meredith Lauren Woehler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.10346symposium

2018-01-01

Abstract:Organizational pay transparency is a hot topic widely discussed among scholars, compensation professionals, employees, politicians and the broader public, and for good reason. Transparency (and its opposite, pay secrecy) affects many important employee judgments and perceptions, including awareness of whether one is are over- or underpaid relative to coworkers, understanding of how merit raise or incentive systems work, perceptions of being fairly paid relative to the external market, and attributions made about the organization itself (e.g., whether it is procedurally fair or not). Despite the growing interest, the pay transparency literature is still in its infancy and additional theorizing and empirical tests are needed. Overall, our symposium showcases a complementary set of papers that (1) contribute to a shared understanding of pay transparency, (2) highlight not only outcomes but also potential antecedents of pay transparency, (3) explore the boundary conditions under which pay transparency has a positive versus negative effect, (4) provide insight on individual differences in pay transparency preferences, and (5) use different research methods (e.g., field study, survey) at different levels of analysis (individual, organizational and multilevel). In bringing these studies and scholars together, we hope to contribute to community building, foster the dialog among researchers and practitioners attending the session, and contribute both theoretically and practically to the advancement of compensation research. Drivers and outcomes of different pay transparency aspects: An organization-level perspective Presenter: Alexandra Arnold; U. of Lucerne Presenter: Ingrid Fulmer; U. of South Australia Presenter: Anna Sender; U. of Lucerne Presenter: Bruno Staffelbach; U. of Zurich The impact of pay secrecy on employee turnover: A multi-level field study Presenter: Valeria Alterman; U. of Florida Presenter: Elena Belogolovsky; Cornell U. Presenter: Peter Bamberger; Tel Aviv U. Presenter: Junqi Shi; Lingnan U. / Sun Yat-sen U. Dulling the double-edged sword: Effects of pay structure transparency on commitment and performanc Presenter: Tae-Youn Park; Vanderbilt U. Presenter: Meredith Lauren Woehler; Vanderbilt U. A social comparison theory perspective on employee pay secrecy preferences Presenter: Brandon Smit; Bentley U. Presenter: Tamara Montag-Smit; Ball State U.
Ambiguity, Invisibility, and Negativity

Frank Wilczek

2023-09-10

Abstract:Many widely different problems have a common mathematical structure wherein limited knowledge lead to ambiguity that can be captured conveniently using a concept of invisibility that requires the introduction of negative values for quantities that are inherently positive. Here I analyze three examples taken from perception theory, rigid body mechanics, and quantum measurement.

Quantum Physics,Classical Physics,Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
Progressive Disclosure: Designing for Effective Transparency

Aaron Springer,Steve Whittaker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.02164

2018-11-06

Abstract:As we increasingly delegate important decisions to intelligent systems, it is essential that users understand how algorithmic decisions are made. Prior work has often taken a technocentric approach to transparency. In contrast, we explore empirical user-centric methods to better understand user reactions to transparent systems. We assess user reactions to global and incremental feedback in two studies. In Study 1, users anticipated that the more transparent incremental system would perform better, but retracted this evaluation after experience with the system. Qualitative data suggest this may arise because incremental feedback is distracting and undermines simple heuristics users form about system operation. Study 2 explored these effects in depth, suggesting that users may benefit from initially simplified feedback that hides potential system errors and assists users in building working heuristics about system operation. We use these findings to motivate new progressive disclosure principles for transparency in intelligent systems.

Human-Computer Interaction

The conflicting meaning of transparency.

Transparency: a two‐way mirror?

The Multi-Faceted Concept of Transparency

The transparency trap

Transparency as Ideology, Ideology as Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony

Unmanaged Transparency in a Digital Society: Swiss army knife or double-edged sword?

Varieties of transparency: exploring agency within AI systems

"I had a solid theory before but it's falling apart": Polarizing Effects of Algorithmic Transparency

Capturing and Articulating Transparency

What Are You Hiding? Algorithmic Transparency and User Perceptions

Power distance belief and preference for transparency

Exploring transparency: a new framework for responsible business management

From Universalizing Transparency to the Interplay of Transparency Matrices: Critical insights from the emerging social credit system in China

Government transparency: paradoxes and dilemmas

Progressive Disclosure

Should transparency be (in-)transparent? On monitoring aversion and cooperation in teams

Modeling Disclosive Transparency in NLP Application Descriptions

How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface

Pay Transparency: Advancing Theory and Empirical Knowledge

Ambiguity, Invisibility, and Negativity

Progressive Disclosure: Designing for Effective Transparency