Abstract:Abstract Objectives We examined whether providing a quantitative report (QReport) of regional brain volumes improves radiologists’ accuracy and confidence in detecting volume loss, and in differentiating Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), compared with visual assessment alone. Methods Our forced-choice multi-rater clinical accuracy study used MRI from 16 AD patients, 14 FTD patients, and 15 healthy controls; age range 52–81. Our QReport was presented to raters with regional grey matter volumes plotted as percentiles against data from a normative population ( n = 461). Nine raters with varying radiological experience (3 each: consultants, registrars, ‘non-clinical image analysts’) assessed each case twice (with and without the QReport). Raters were blinded to clinical and demographic information; they classified scans as ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’ and if ‘abnormal’ as ‘AD’ or ‘FTD’. Results The QReport improved sensitivity for detecting volume loss and AD across all raters combined ( p = 0.015* and p = 0.002*, respectively). Only the consultant group’s accuracy increased significantly when using the QReport ( p = 0.02*) . Overall, raters’ agreement (Cohen’s κ ) with the ‘gold standard’ was not significantly affected by the QReport; only the consultant group improved significantly ( κ s 0.41➔0.55, p = 0.04*). Cronbach’s alpha for interrater agreement improved from 0.886 to 0.925, corresponding to an improvement from ‘good’ to ‘excellent’. Conclusion Our QReport referencing single-subject results to normative data alongside visual assessment improved sensitivity, accuracy, and interrater agreement for detecting volume loss. The QReport was most effective in the consultants, suggesting that experience is needed to fully benefit from the additional information provided by quantitative analyses. Key Points • The use of quantitative report alongside routine visual MRI assessment improves sensitivity and accuracy for detecting volume loss and AD vs visual assessment alone. • Consultant neuroradiologists’ assessment accuracy and agreement (kappa scores) significantly improved with the use of quantitative atrophy reports. • First multi-rater radiological clinical evaluation of visual quantitative MRI atrophy report for use as a diagnostic aid in dementia.

Agreement and Reliability between Clinically Available Software Programs in Measuring Volumes and Normative Percentiles of Segmented Brain Regions

Comparison of Inter-Method Agreement and Reliability for Automatic Brain Volumetry Using Three Different Clinically Available Software Packages

Reliability of automated brain volumetric analysis: A test by comparing NeuroQuant and volBrain software

Comparison of Automated Brain Volume Measures by NeuroQuant vs. Freesurfer in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Effect of Slice Thickness

Comparison of Automated Brain Volume Measures obtained with NeuroQuant® and FreeSurfer

SU-E-I-70: Comparison of Brain Volume Quantification with NeuroQuant & FreeSurfer

Comparing two artificial intelligence software packages for normative brain volumetry in memory clinic imaging

Evaluating brain volume segmentation accuracy and reliability of FreeSurfer and Neurophet AQUA at variations in MRI magnetic field strengths

Inter-Software Consistency on the Estimation of Subcortical Structure Volume in Different Age Groups

Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model for assessing intracranial volume: comparison with NeuroQuant, FreeSurfer, and SynthSeg

Brain regional volume estimations with NeuroQuant and FIRST: a study in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome

Automated brain volumetric program measuring regional brain atrophy in diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia

Automated quantitative MRI volumetry reports support diagnostic interpretation in dementia: a multi-rater, clinical accuracy study

Standardization of hippocampus volumetry using automated brain structure volumetry tool for an initial Alzheimer's disease imaging biomarker

Inter- and Intra-Scanner Variability of Automated Brain Volumetry on Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems in Alzheimer's Disease and Controls

Comparison of Manual and Automatic Methods of Hippocampus Segmentation

Quantifying numerical and spatial reliability of hippocampal and amygdala subdivisions in FreeSurfer

SU‐E‐T‐40: Exploring the Reproducibility of Tumor Volumes Measured by Radiologist, Computer‐Aided Radiologist and Computer Alone

Reproducibility of volume and asymmetry measurements of hippocampus, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex on traveling volunteers: a multisite MP2RAGE prospective study

Comparing Automated Subcortical Volume Estimation Methods; Amygdala Volumes Estimated by FSL and FreeSurfer Have Poor Consistency

Improving segmentation reliability of multi-scanner brain images using a generative adversarial network