Abstract:87 Background: While LuPSMA has a proven overall survival (OS) benefit in patients (pts) with mCRPC who have received prior taxane chemotherapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, there is limited data on outcomes and efficacy of subsequent therapy in pts who have received LuPSMA. This study aimed to assess the clinical and treatment courses of pts with mCRPC after LuPSMA. Methods: We queried an IRB-approved prospectively maintained registry to evaluate all pts with mCRPC who received standard-of-care LuPSMA at our institution between June 2022 and July 2023. Clinical data pertaining to LuPSMA therapy as well as subsequent treatments were extracted from the medical record, including type and number of subsequent systemic therapies, reason for treatment cessation, hematologic support, and PSA response to subsequent therapy. PSA-50 was defined as a ≥50% decrease in PSA on therapy. Hematologic adverse events to therapies after LuPSMA were recorded and graded per CTCAEv5.0. Results: A total of 96 patients were evaluated; median age was 72 years (range 52-87), and median follow-up was 10 months. 18 pts completed all 6 cycles, 35 discontinued prior to cycle 6 of LuPSMA due to progressive disease, 10 died mid-treatment, and 33 were midway through treatment; median number of cycles received for all pts was 4 (range 1-6). None of the 18 who completed all 6 cycles had yet transitioned to a next line therapy. Of the 35 who discontinued LuPSMA, 17 transitioned to hospice due to disease progression, 15 initiated a subsequent line of therapy, and 3 had a treatment break. Median overall survival was 13 months in the entire cohort. Of the 15 receiving another line of therapy, 11 received cabazitaxel ± carboplatin/cisplatin, 1 received carboplatin with cisplatin substituted during carboplatin shortage, and 4 received other non-chemotherapy regimens; a PSA-50 response to subsequent therapy was seen in 4 patients (27%), all of whom received cabazitaxel ± carboplatin/cisplatin. Of the 12 pts who received chemotherapy, the median number of cycles received was 3 (range 1-7); 4 pts (33%) had grade ≥3 anemia, 2 (17%) had grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia and 7 pts (47%) required platelet growth factor support or transfusion of blood products. Conclusions: 47% of pts discontinuing LuPSMA transitioned to hospice due to disease progression while 44% proceeded to a subsequent line of therapy, the majority of whom received cabazitaxel. Outcomes to subsequent therapy were generally poor, with a 27% PSA-50 response rate. This initial experience may be biased by number of patients with limited standard of care options at the time of FDA approval of LuPSMA and could improve with better patient selection. However, this also highlights the continued need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for CRPC pts post-LuPSMA.

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Following Discontinuation of PD-1/L1 Inhibitor Therapy

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma by Eligibility for Maintenance Avelumab

Evolving treatment landscape in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) post-avelumab maintenance approval: Real-world insights from The US Oncology Network.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Sequencing, and Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Avelumab First-Line Maintenance in the United States

Real-world treatment (tx) patterns and clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) in Germany: Results of a retrospective observational study (CONVINCE).

Real-world (rw) treatment (tx) patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) treated with avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM): Updated results from the SPEAR Bladder II study.

Real-world (rw) treatment patterns, sequencing, and outcomes in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) receiving avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM) in the US.

Patient outcomes after therapy with 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A tertiary center experience.

Subgroup analyses from READY: Real-world data from an Italian compassionate use program (CUP) of avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM) treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC).

Real-World Outcomes of First-Line Treatment With Anti-PD(L)1-Based Combination Therapy for Nonsquamous Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multiregional Chart Review in Europe, Japan, and the United States

Avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Results from the real-world US PATRIOT-II study.

Treatment (Rx) trends and attrition with lines of therapy in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC).

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin and Treated With First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Alone or With Pembrolizumab

Clinical efficacy of enfortumab-pembrolizumab combination therapy in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): A real-world experience.

Efficacy and Adverse Events of PD-1 Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma from a Real-World Experience

Analysis of therapy attrition and changes in outcomes over time for patients (pts) with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) treated at an academic center.

Frontline pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression ≥50%: real-world outcomes in a US community oncology setting

The Vanishing Clinical Value of PD-L1 Status as a Predictive Biomarker in the First-Line Treatment of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder

Impact of Prior Chemotherapy on Response to Second-line Pembrolizumab in Urothelial Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial

Role of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI).

Avelumab First-Line Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial After ≥2 Years of Follow-Up