Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin and Treated With First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Alone or With Pembrolizumab

Matthew I. Milowsky,Peter H. O'Donnell,Christopher J. Hoimes,Daniel P. Petrylak,Thomas W. Flaig,Helen H. Moon,Terence W. Friedlander,Nataliya Mar,Rana R. McKay,Sandy Srinivas,Gwenaelle Gravis,Chethan Ramamurthy,Manojkumar Bupathi,Sergio Bracarda,Phoebe Wright,Zsolt Hepp,Anne-Sophie Carret,Yao Yu,Ryan Dillon,Ritesh Kataria,Jennifer L. Beaumont,Intan Purnajo,Jonathan E. Rosenberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.23.01547
IF: 45.3
2024-01-14
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:PURPOSE Locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) affects patients' quality of life (QOL) and functioning. We describe the impact of first-line (1L) enfortumab vedotin (EV) alone or with pembrolizumab (P) on QOL/functioning/symptoms in patients with la/mUC who were cisplatin-ineligible from EV-103 Cohort K. METHODS In this phase Ib/II trial, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to EV + P or EV monotherapy (mono). Exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire–Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) at baseline, once per week for cycles 1-3, and then in every cycle through the end of treatment. Changes in scores from baseline to week 24, reported as least squares mean (standard error), were assessed by mixed models for repeated measures. There were no formal statistical comparisons between treatment arms. RESULTS Of 149 patients treated, 65 (EV + P) and 63 (EV mono) comprised the PRO analysis set. For EV + P, EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL was maintained through week 24 with improvements in emotional functioning, pain, and insomnia. Clinically meaningful improvements were seen in EORTC QLQ-C30 pain after EV + P at weeks 12 (–14.41 [3.14]) and 24 (–14.99 [3.56]) and BPI-SF worst pain at week 24 (–2.07 [0.37]). For EV mono, EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL remained stable with clinically meaningful improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 pain (–12.55 [4.27]), insomnia (–14.46 [4.69]), and constipation (–10.09 [4.35]) at week 24. There were small-to-moderate improvements in BPI-SF worst pain at week 24. CONCLUSION EV + P in patients with la/mUC who were cisplatin-ineligible was associated with preservation or improvement of QOL/functioning/symptoms. Improvement in pain was seen in both PRO instruments and treatment arms. These data complement clinical outcomes of 1L EV + P.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?