The surgical pathology of ulcerative colitis.

C. Dukes

1954-06-01

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Abstract:A RECENT ARTICLE in the Lancet (Brooke 1954) entitled "What is Ulcerative Colitis ? " was followed by a protracted and animated correspondence which proved at any rate that this simple question has more than one answer! " Ulcerative colitis " to some includes almost any inflammatory process of uncertain aetiology in the colon whether localized or diffuse, mild or severe: whereas others restrict it to a severe non-specific inflammation of the whole colon accompanied by varying degrees of ulceration. Wells (1952) has suggested that for the present it is best to group cases simply on a basis of descriptive pathology. I agree with this but find it difficult to follow his example of including as idiopathic ulcerative colitis only those cases in which the inflammatory process affects the whole colon in continuity, because often some portion of the large bowel remains unaffected. Ulcerative colitis seems to start most commonly in the rectum and pelvic colon, spreading back gradually towards the caecum. In operation specimens removed by total colectomy it is not unusual to find severe ulceration of the left half of the colon and relatively little if any inflammation of the ascending colon or caecum. Sometimes indeed ulceration ceases abruptly at some point in the transverse or descending colon. Proximal to this sharp line of demarcation the bowel appears healthy whereas distally it is obviously diseased. When only a short region of the colon is affected this is sometimes described as regional or segmental colitis, but it has yet to be proved that this is any more than a localized manifestation of a pathological process which more commonly affects a larger area. The modern surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis by colectomy has provided a new opportunity for the study of the lesions present in severe cases and during the last four years I have examined colectomy specimens from 120 patients. These were all patients in whom medical treatment had failed to arrest the progress of the disease, so that colectomy was eventually resorted to as a life-saving operation. In a sense colectomy must always be regarded as a " confession of failure" but in the type of case to which I am referring it was the only known way of saving life and restoring health. Before describing the lesions found in these severe cases I shouldlike first to recall the very clear description given by Corbett (1945) of the earlier stages of the disease as seen by a surgeon through the sigmoidoscope. I quote from his Presidential Address to the Section of Proctology of the Royal Society of Medicine. " First the bowel is seen to be hyperaemic and later there is oedema and thickening of the mucous membrane