Toward an Ultimate Solution for Peptide Retention Time Prediction: The Effect of Column Temperature on Separation Selectivity
Carina Villacrés,Benilde Mizero,Victor Spicer,Rosa Viner,Julian Saba,Bhavinkumar Patel,Sergei Snovida,Penny Jensen,Andreas Huhmer,Oleg V. Krokhin,Carina Villacrés
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00018
2024-03-26
Journal of Proteome Research
Abstract:We studied the effect of the column temperature on the selectivity of reversed-phase peptide separation in bottom-up proteomics. The number of peptide identifications from 2 h liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) acquisitions reaches a plateau at 45-55 °C, driven simultaneously by improved separation efficiency, a gradual decrease in peptide retention, and possible on-column degradation of peptides at elevated temperatures. Performing 2D LC-MS/MS acquisitions at 25, 35, 45, and 55 °C resulted in the identification of ∼100,000 and ∼120,000 unique peptides for nonmodified and tandem mass tags (TMT)-labeled samples, respectively. These peptide collections were used to investigate the temperature-driven retention features. The latter is governed by the specific temperature response of individual residues, peptide hydrophobicity and length, and amphipathic helicity. On average, peptide retention decreased by 0.56 and 0.5% acetonitrile for each 10 °C increase for label-free and TMT-labeled peptides, respectively. This generally linear response of retention shifts allowed the extrapolation of predictive models beyond the studied temperature range. Thus, (trap) column cooling from room temperature to 0 °C will allow the retention of an additional 3% of detectable tryptic peptides. Meanwhile, the application of 90 °C would result in the loss of ∼20% of tryptic peptides that were amenable to MS/MS-based identification.
biochemical research methods