Convulsions During Diabetic Ketosis: A Case Report

K. Gurling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.5.6.486

IF: 7.7

1956-11-01

Diabetes

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Contact behaviour before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: evidence from contact surveys, 2016 to 2017 and 2020 to 2023

Jantien A Backer,Eric R A Vos,Gerco den Hartog,Cheyenne C E van Hagen,Hester E de Melker,Fiona R M van der Klis and Jacco Wallinga

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2024.29.43.2400143

2024-10-25

Eurosurveillance

Abstract:Background The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 was largely mitigated by limiting contacts in the general population. In early 2022, most contact-reducing measures were lifted. Aim To assess whether the population has reverted to pre-pandemic contact behaviour and how this would affect transmission potential of a newly emerging pathogen. Methods We compared two studies on contact behaviour in the Netherlands: the PIENTER Corona study, conducted during and after the pandemic (held every 2–6 months from April 2020) and the PIENTER3 study (2016–17, as pre-pandemic baseline). In both, participants (ages 1–85 years) reported number and age group of all face-to-face persons contacted on the previous day in a survey. Transmission potential was examined using the next-generation matrix approach. Results We found an average of 15.4 (95% CI: 14.3–16.4) community contacts per person per day after the pandemic in May 2023, 13% lower than baseline (17.8; 95% CI: 17.0–18.5). Among all ages, children (5–9 years) had the highest number of contacts, both pre- and post-pandemic. Mainly adults aged 20–59 years had not reverted to pre-pandemic behaviours, possibly because they more often work from home. Although the number of contacts is lower compared to the pre-pandemic period, the effect on transmission potential of a newly emerging respiratory pathogen is limited if all age groups were equally susceptible. Conclusion Continuous monitoring of contacts can signal changes in contact patterns and can define a 'new normal' baseline. Both aspects are needed to prepare for a future pandemic.

infectious diseases
Measuring the frequency and determinants of COVID-19 prevention behaviours: a cross-sectional assessment of large-scale programmes in seven countries, late 2020

Sarah Bick,Sian White,Astrid Hasund Thorseth,Max N D Friedrich,Ian Gavin,Om Prasad Gautam,Robert Dreibelbis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082419

IF: 3.006

2024-08-19

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives This multicountry analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of key hygiene prevention behaviours and their determinants, associated with international non-governmental organisation (WaterAid) hygiene behaviour change programmes for COVID-19 prevention. The goal of this analysis is to inform future outbreak preparedness and pandemic response in low and middle-income countries. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Households in seven countries where WaterAid implemented a first-phase COVID-19 response programme in 2020 (Ethiopia, Ghana, Nepal, Nigeria, Rwanda, Tanzania and Zambia). Participants 3033 adults (1469 men and 1564 women, alternately sampled from one household to the next to maintain gender balance) in specific programme areas (211 villages) surveyed between October and November 2020. Primary outcome measures Self-reported primary outcomes were: a composite measure of HWWS for prevention of respiratory infection/COVID-19 (total of 5 key moments); respondent increased HWWS behaviour after the COVID-19 pandemic; respondent always wears a mask in public spaces; respondent always practices physical distancing in public spaces. Results Most respondents (80%) reported increasing their handwashing behaviour after the pandemic, but practice of HWWS at COVID-19-specific prevention moments was low. Mask wearing (58%) and physical distancing (29%) varied substantially between countries. Determinants of key behaviours were identified, including age and socioeconomic status, perceived norms, self-regulation and the motive of protecting others. Incidence rate ratios or odds ratios and 95% CIs for a range of psychosocial determinants for each of the four primary outcomes are reported. Conclusions These findings highlight that leveraging behaviour-specific emotional drivers and norms, reducing common barriers and promoting targeted messages about specific behaviours and actions individuals can take to reduce risk are necessary to support large-scale behaviour change. Learning from the COVID-19 response to more effectively integrate novel behaviours into existing health promotion will be vital for disease prevention and outbreak resilience.

medicine, general & internal
Mass behaviour change amid COVID-19: How public health information and social norms explain the transformation

Joan Carlini,Marie-Louise Fry,Debra Grace,Melissa Fox,Peta-Anne Zimmerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2022.2160854

Abstract:COVID-19 is a severe and ongoing threat globally, with the spread disrupting lives and society. Despite the developments of vaccines, the key measure to reduce the transmission of variants has stemmed from mass changes to personal behaviours. COVID-19 pandemic offers a unique context, where the protection behaviours enacted by an individual are necessary to keep the community safe. A social psychological perspective can be used to understand the reasons for adherence to policies and determine what other factors can shape preventive behaviours. To resolve this, in partnership with health consumers we use an online survey, with the findings substantiating preventive behaviours are positively related to COVID-19 information access and descriptive norms. Additionally, findings demonstrate the mediating role of injunctive norms on preventive behaviour suggesting that policy makers can influence decision-making by promoting health information that provides guidance on acceptable behaviours, but also demonstrates subsequent success. The integrity of the model is substantiated by partial least squares (PLS) testing.
Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Toby Wise,Tomislav D. Zbozinek,Giorgia Michelini,Cindy C. Hagan,Dean Mobbs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200742

IF: 3.5

2020-09-01

Royal Society Open Science

Abstract:Efforts to change behaviour are critical in minimizing the spread of highly transmissible pandemics such as COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether individuals are aware of disease risk and alter their behaviour early in the pandemic. We investigated risk perception and self-reported engagement in protective behaviours in 1591 United States-based individuals cross-sectionally and longitudinally over the first week of the pandemic. Subjects demonstrated growing awareness of risk and reported engaging in protective behaviours with increasing frequency but underestimated their risk of infection relative to the average person in the country. Social distancing and hand washing were most strongly predicted by the perceived probability of personally being infected. However, a subgroup of individuals perceived low risk and did not engage in these behaviours. Our results highlight the importance of risk perception in early interventions during large-scale pandemics.

multidisciplinary sciences
Changing Trends of Excess Self-Protective Behavior, and Association with Belief in Prevention Myths During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: A Panel Study

Sihui Peng,Tingzhong Yang,Ian R H Rockett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.18.20102434

IF: 5.556

2024-01-01

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

Abstract:Abstract Objective This prospective observational study examined changing trends of excess self-protective behavior (EPB), and its association with perceived risk, severity and belief in prevention myths during the Chinese COVID-19 epidemic. Methods The study employed a longitudinal design. Participants were recruited for an online panel survey from chat groups on social media platforms. Descriptive statistics and the CATMOD program were used for data analysis. Findings Participants numbered 150 for the linkable baseline survey and 102 for the final survey. There were 5 waves of interviews. The prevalence of participants perceiving a personal risk of contracting COVID-19, and severe consequences of the disease, was 18.6% and 25.5%, respectively. Their prevalence had declined to 4.9% and 17.6%, respectively, by the last observation point. The 5 selected EPBs also manifested a decreasing trend. Belief in COVID-19 prevention myths trended upwards. Perceived risk was positively associated with each EPB, and perceived severity with disinfection of clothes and hoarding of products. Myth adherence was positively associated with disinfection of clothes and both hand washing and sanitization. Conclusion This study yielded new information about EPB among the public during the COVID-19 epidemic. Policy and health education modifications are essential for minimizing the adverse health effects of subscribing to prevention myths.
Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Perceived Behavioral Control, Attitudes, and Subjective Norm

Damaris Aschwanden,Jason E. Strickhouser,Amanda A. Sesker,Ji Hyun Lee,Martina Luchetti,Antonio Terracciano,Angelina R. Sutin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.662835

IF: 5.2

2021-05-07

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious and potentially fatal infectious disease that has swept the globe. To reduce the spread, it is important to engage in preventive behaviors recommended by health authorities, such as washing your hands, wearing a face mask, and social distancing. Aim: In the present study, we draw from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to examine the associations between perceived behavioral control, attitudes, and subjective norm and whether people engage in eight different preventive behaviors. Methods: For each of the preventive behaviors (washing hands; using hand sanitizer; not touching your face; social distancing; wearing a face mask; disinfecting surfaces; coughing in your elbow; staying home if sick), we conducted separate logistic regressions predicting whether the participants ( N = 2,256; age range = 18–98 years) reported engaging in the behavior from their perceived behavioral control, attitudes, and subjective norm. Results: We found that perceived behavioral control, attitudes, and subjective norm had independent significant associations with each preventive behavior. Moderation analyses revealed that for most behaviors the associations with perceived behavioral control were stronger for older adults than for younger adults. Limitation: The present study was cross-sectional; future longitudinal studies and interventions are needed to disentangle directionality. Conclusion: Our findings suggest several ways to increase adherence to health behaviors that reduce the spread of coronavirus and other infectious diseases.

public, environmental & occupational health
Predicting health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study

Robin Wollast,Mathias Schmitz,Alix Bigot,Marie Brisbois,Olivier Luminet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299868

IF: 3.7

2024-03-16

PLoS ONE

Abstract:We investigated the social, emotional, and cognitive predictors of adherence to four health behaviors (handwashing, mask wearing, social contact limitations, and physical distancing) during one critical phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected data ( N = 5803, mean age = 53; 57% women) in Belgium at five time points between April and July 2021, a time during which infections evolved from high (third wave of the pandemic) to low numbers of COVID-19 cases. The results show that the social, emotional, and cognitive predictors achieved high levels of explained variance ( R 2 > .60). In particular, the central components of behavioral change (attitudes, intentions, control, habits, norms, and risk) were the strongest and most consistent predictors of health behaviors over time. Likewise, autonomous motivation and empathetic emotions (e.g., attentive, compassionate) had a positive impact on health behavior adherence, whereas it was the opposite for lively emotions (e.g., active, enthusiastic). These results offer policymakers actionable insights into the most potent and stable factors associated with health behaviors, equipping them with effective strategies to curtail the spread of future infectious diseases.

multidisciplinary sciences
Impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle-related behaviours- a cross-sectional audit of responses from nine hundred and ninety-five participants from India

Sakshi Chopra,Piyush Ranjan,Vishwajeet Singh,Suraj Kumar,Mehak Arora,Mohamed Shuaib Hasan,Rhytha Kasiraj,Suryansh,Divjyot Kaur,Naval K. Vikram,Anita Malhotra,Archana Kumari,Kamal Bandhu Klanidhi,Upendra Baitha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.09.034

2020-11-01

Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews

Abstract:Background and aimsThe impact of measures taken to contain COVID-19 on lifestyle-related behaviour is undefined in Indian population. The current study was undertaken to assess the impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle-related behaviours: eating, physical activity and sleep behaviour.MethodsThe study is a cross-sectional web-based survey. A validated questionnaire to assess the changes in lifestyle-related behaviour was administered on adults across India using a Google online survey platform.ResultsA total of 995 responses (58.5% male, mean age 33.3 years) were collected. An improvement in healthy meal consumption pattern and a restriction of unhealthy food items was observed, especially in the younger population (age <30 years). A reduction in physical activity coupled with an increase in daily screen time was found especially among men and in upper-socio-economic strata. Quarantine induced stress and anxiety showed an increase by a unit in nearly one-fourth of the participants.ConclusionsCOVID-19 marginally improved the eating behaviour, yet one-third of participants gained weight as physical activity declined significantly coupled with an increase in screen and sitting time. Mental health was also adversely affected. A detailed understanding of these factors can help to develop interventions to mitigate the negative lifestyle behaviours that have manifested during COVID-19.
Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission

Robert West,Susan Michie,G. James Rubin,Richard Amlôt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0887-9

IF: 24.252

2020-05-01

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:Human behaviour is central to transmission of SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and changing behaviour is crucial to preventing transmission in the absence of pharmaceutical interventions. Isolation and social distancing measures, including edicts to stay at home, have been brought into place across the globe to reduce transmission of the virus, but at a huge cost to individuals and society. In addition to these measures, we urgently need effective interventions to increase adherence to behaviours that individuals in communities can enact to protect themselves and others: use of tissues to catch expelled droplets from coughs or sneezes, use of face masks as appropriate, hand-washing on all occasions when required, disinfecting objects and surfaces, physical distancing, and not touching one's eyes, nose or mouth. There is an urgent need for direct evidence to inform development of such interventions, but it is possible to make a start by applying behavioural science methods and models.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
The potential stickiness of pandemic-induced behavior changes in the United States

Deborah Salon,Matthew Wigginton Conway,Denise Capasso da Silva,Rishabh Singh Chauhan,Sybil Derrible,Abolfazl Mohammadian,Sara Khoeini,Nathan Parker,Laura Mirtich,Ali Shamshiripour,Ehsan Rahimi,Ram M. Pendyala,Abolfazl (Kouros) Mohammadian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106499118

IF: 11.1

2021-06-17

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract:Human behavior is notoriously difficult to change, but a disruption of the magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to bring about long-term behavioral changes. During the pandemic, people have been forced to experience new ways of interacting, working, learning, shopping, traveling, and eating meals. A critical question going forward is how these experiences have actually changed preferences and habits in ways that might persist after the pandemic ends. Many observers have suggested theories about what the future will bring, but concrete evidence has been lacking. We present evidence on how much US adults expect their own postpandemic choices to differ from their prepandemic lifestyles in the areas of telecommuting, restaurant patronage, air travel, online shopping, transit use, car commuting, uptake of walking and biking, and home location. The analysis is based on a nationally representative survey dataset collected between July and October 2020. Key findings include that the “new normal” will feature a doubling of telecommuting, reduced air travel, and improved quality of life for some.

multidisciplinary sciences
Changes in risk perception and protective behavior during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Toby Wise,Tomislav Damir Zbozinek,Giorgia Michelini,Cindy C. Hagan,dean mobbs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dz428

2020-03-19

Abstract:By mid-March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic spread to over 100 countries and all 50 states in the US. Government efforts to minimize the spread of disease emphasized behavioral interventions, including raising awareness of the disease and encouraging protective behaviors such as social distancing and hand washing, and seeking medical attention if experiencing symptoms. However, it is unclear to what extent individuals are aware of the risks associated with the disease, how they are altering their behavior, factors which could influence the spread of the virus to vulnerable populations. We characterized risk perception and engagement in preventative measures in 1591 United States based individuals over the first week of the pandemic (March 11th-16th 2020) and examined the extent to which protective behaviors are predicted by individuals’ perception of risk. Over 5 days, subjects demonstrated growing awareness of the risk posed by the virus, and largely reported engaging in protective behaviors with increasing frequency. However, they underestimated their personal risk of infection relative to the average person in the country. We found that engagement in social distancing and handwashing was most strongly predicted by the perceived likelihood of personally being infected, rather than likelihood of transmission or severity of potential transmitted infections. However, substantial variability emerged among individuals, and using data-driven methods we found a subgroup of subjects who are largely disengaged, unaware, and not practicing protective behaviors. Our results have implications for our understanding of how risk perception and protective behaviors can facilitate early interventions during large-scale pandemics.
Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review

Nicola Perra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.15230

2020-12-30

Physics and Society

Abstract:Infectious diseases and human behavior are intertwined. On one side, our movements and interactions are the engines of transmission. On the other, the unfolding of viruses might induce changes to our daily activities. While intuitive, our understanding of such feedback loop is still limited. Before COVID-19 the literature on the subject was mainly theoretical and largely missed validation. The main issue was the lack of empirical data capturing behavioral change induced by diseases. Things have dramatically changed in 2020. Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been the key weapon against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and affected virtually any societal process. Travels bans, events cancellation, social distancing, curfews, and lockdowns have become unfortunately very familiar. The scale of the emergency, the ease of survey as well as crowdsourcing deployment guaranteed by the latest technology, several Data for Good programs developed by tech giants, major mobile phone providers, and other companies have allowed unprecedented access to data describing behavioral changes induced by the pandemic. Here, I aim to review some of the vast literature written on the subject of NPIs during the COVID-19 pandemic. In doing so, I analyze 347 articles written by more than 2518 of authors in the last $12$ months. While the large majority of the sample was obtained by querying PubMed, it includes also a hand-curated list. Considering the focus, and methodology I have classified the sample into seven main categories: epidemic models, surveys, comments/perspectives, papers aiming to quantify the effects of NPIs, reviews, articles using data proxies to measure NPIs, and publicly available datasets describing NPIs. I summarize the methodology, data used, findings of the articles in each category and provide an outlook highlighting future challenges as well as opportunities
Psychosocial determinants of handwashing and physical distancing behaviour during the COVID‐19 pandemic in the Netherlands: A longitudinal analysis

Carlijn Bussemakers,Nicole Stappers,Floor Kroese,Bas van den Putte,Marijn de Bruin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12755

2024-10-03

British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract:Objectives Physical distancing and handwashing can be important infection prevention measures during an infectious disease outbreak such as the COVID‐19 pandemic. To stimulate these behaviours, knowledge of psychosocial determinants as well as contextual factors is vital. We present longitudinal, within‐person analyses of the impact of contextual and psychosocial factors on handwashing and distancing behaviour. Design We used individual‐level data (186,490 participants completing 971,899 surveys) from the Corona Behavioural Unit COVID‐19 Cohort, a dynamic cohort study conducted during 26 months of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Methods Fixed‐effects models were employed to estimate within‐person associations between psychosocial factors and behaviour, combined with main and moderating effects of contextual factors. Results Pandemic severity was associated with more handwashing and distancing behaviour, while the duration of the pandemic had little effect. Within‐person changes in response efficacy were most relevant for changes in both handwashing and distancing behaviour, while self‐efficacy, descriptive norms and perceived severity of infecting others affected behaviour indirectly. These effects were stable over time. Associations were larger in cross‐sectional models, indicating that such models tend to overestimate effects. Conclusions Our study highlights the importance of longitudinal data and within‐person models to detect possible causal associations. The results suggest that during an outbreak, government and public health professionals should clearly communicate the severity of the pandemic (e.g., hospitalization rates) and the effectiveness of recommended prevention measures in reducing that risk; and seek to improve people's capabilities and opportunities to adhere to guidelines, for example, by modifying the environment.

psychology, clinical
The impact of behavioral interventions on respiratory viruses in a two-cohort study

Behnam Nikparvar,Cara Exten,Nita Bharti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.06.24306945

2024-05-07

Abstract:Behavioral interventions are a critical tool for managing novel and emerging pathogens. However, the dynamics of behavioral interventions have been difficult to measure and are poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the uptake, persistence, and waning, of behavioral interventions among two cohorts in Centre County, PA, focusing on the three years following the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. We detected clusters of behaviors that followed similar patterns of engagement and variations over time and identified some novel COVID-19 behavioral interventions that may have severely disrupted non-COVID-19 respiratory disease incidence. Additionally, we detected links between changes in risk perception and changes in behaviors over time. These findings can inform recommendations around behavioral interventions during outbreak management, including information dissemination and behavioral guidelines.

Epidemiology
Infection Control in the Home: a Qualitative Study Exploring Perceptions and Experiences of Adhering to Protective Behaviours in the Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Katherine Morton,Lauren Towler,Julia Groot,Sascha Miller,Ben Ainsworth,James Denison-Day,Cathy Rice,Jennifer Bostock,Merlin Willcox,Paul Little,Lucy Yardley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056161

IF: 3.006

2021-01-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:OBJECTIVES:We sought to explore people's experiences and perceptions of implementing infection control behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic, guided by an online behavioural intervention.DESIGN:Inductive qualitative study.SETTING:UK public during the COVID-19 pandemic.PARTICIPANTS:Thirteen people took part in telephone interviews, and 124 completed a qualitative open-text survey. All were recruited from the public. Most survey participants were aged over 60 years, while interview participants were more distributed in age. Most reported being at increased risk from COVID-19, and were white British.INTERVENTION:Online behavioural intervention to support infection control behaviours in the home during the COVID-19 pandemic.DATA COLLECTION:Telephone think-aloud interviews and qualitative survey data.DATA ANALYSIS:The think-aloud interview data and qualitative survey data were analysed independently using inductive thematic analysis. The findings were subsequently triangulated.RESULTS:Thematic analysis of the telephone interviews generated seven themes: perceived risk; belief in the effectiveness of protective behaviours; acceptability of distancing and isolation; having capacity to perform the behaviours; habit forming reduces effort; having the confidence to perform the behaviours; and social norms affect motivation to engage in the behaviours. The themes identified from the survey data mapped well onto the interview analysis. Isolating and social distancing at home were less acceptable than cleaning and handwashing, influenced by the need for intimacy with household members. This was especially true in the absence of symptoms and when perceived risk was low. People felt more empowered when they understood that even small changes, such as spending some time apart, were worthwhile to reduce exposure and lessen viral load.CONCLUSIONS:The current study provided valuable insight into the acceptability and feasibility of protective behaviours, and how public health guidance could be incorporated into a behaviour change intervention for the public during a pandemic.
Survey of public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding personal protection against COVID-19 in the post-pandemic era

Shixian Luo,Jing Xie,Jie Chen,Hongyu Li,Sining Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411055

IF: 3.8

2024-06-11

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:In the emerging post-pandemic era (the 'wavelet' era), humans must coexist with viruses for the foreseeable future, and personal protective behaviors will largely replace national-level preventive measures. In this new normal, encouraging the public to implement proper personal protective behaviors against the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is vital to the sustainable development of cities and communities. This knowledge–attitude–practice (KAP) survey conducted in Chengdu ( N = 900) narrowed the knowledge gap regarding post-pandemic public practices of protective behavior. Findings show that:(1) approximately 1/3 of the respondents are currently not concerned about COVID-19 at all; (2) respondents with different demographics and individual COVID-19-related factors showed significant differences in practice behaviors indoors and outdoors; (3) vulnerable groups performed better in practice behavior indoors/outdoors; (4) because the public may relax their vigilance outdoors, public places may become a transmission threat in the next outbreak; (5) attitudes are important, but limited incentives for practice; and (6) when knowledge increases beyond a threshold (68.75–75% in this study), protective behaviors decrease. Our results suggest that authorities must continue to educate and motivate the public, extending measures to cover personal protective practices, and have targeted policies for specific demographics to ensure equity in healthcare in the event of another pandemic (COVID-19 and alike crisis). Besides, comparing the results of the current study with similar studies conducted in other parts of the world can provide insights into how different populations respond to and adopt COVID-19 protective behaviors. The epidemiologists can use the data collected by this and other KAP surveys to refine epidemiologic models, which can help predict the spread of the virus and the impact of interventions in different settings.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Changes in COVID-19 Risk Perceptions: Methods of an Internet Survey Conducted in Six Countries.

Zhang Felicia,Shih Shu-Fang,Harapan,Rajamoorthy Yogambigai,National Taiwan University Hospital,Singh Awnish,Lu Yihan,Wagner Abram L.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05846-8

2021-01-01

BMC Research Notes

Abstract:OBJECTIVES:This study assessed changes in behaviors/attitudes related to the COVID-19. With the understanding that behaviors and vaccine decision-making could contribute to global spread of infectious diseases, this study collected several waves of internet-based surveys from individuals in the United States, mainland China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia, and India. The aims of this study were to (1) characterize the relationship between the epidemiology of disease and changes over time in risk perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes towards hygienic behaviors; (2) examine if risk perceptions affect acceptance of less-than-ideal vaccines; and (3) contrast adherence to public health recommendations across countries which have had different governmental responses to the outbreak.DATA DESCRIPTION:We conducted cross-sectional online surveys in six countries from March 2020 to April 2021. By the end of June 2021, there will be six waves of surveys for the United States and China, and four waves for the rest of countries. There are common sets of questions for all countries, however, some questions were adapted to reflect local situations and some questions were designed intentionally for specific countries to capture different COVID-19 mitigation actions. Participants were asked about their adherence towards countermeasures, risk perceptions, and acceptance of a hypothetical vaccine for COVID-19.
Optische Kohärenztomographie in der Gynäkologie

M. Löning,E. Lankenau,H. Diddens,M. Krokowski,K. Diedrich,G. Hüttmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-007-1976-9

2007-05-01

Der Gynäkologe

Abstract:
Adoption of Preventive Measures During the Very Early Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: National Cross-sectional Survey Study

Joseph Lau,Yanqiu Yu,Meiqi Xin,Rui She,Sitong Luo,Lijuan Li,Suhua Wang,Le Ma,Fangbiao Tao,Jianxin Zhang,Junfeng Zhao,Dongsheng Hu,Liping Li,Guohua Zhang,Jing Gu,Danhua Lin,Hongmei Wang,Yong Cai,Zhaofen Wang,Hua You,Guoqing Hu,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/26840

2021-10-07

JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Abstract:Background The outbreak of COVID-19 in China occurred around the Chinese New Year (January 25, 2020), and infections decreased continuously afterward. General adoption of preventive measures during the Chinese New Year period was crucial in driving the decline. It is imperative to investigate preventive behaviors among Chinese university students, who could have spread COVID-19 when travelling home during the Chinese New Year break. Objective In this study, we investigated levels of COVID-19–related personal measures undertaken during the 7-day Chinese New Year holidays by university students in China, and associated COVID-19–related cognitive factors. Methods A cross-sectional anonymous web-based survey was conducted during the period from February 1 to 10, 2020. Data from 23,863 students (from 26 universities, 16 cities, 13 provincial-level regions) about personal measures (frequent face-mask wearing, frequent handwashing, frequent home staying, and an indicator that combined the 3 behaviors) were analyzed (overall response rate 70%). Multilevel multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. Results Only 28.0% of respondents (6684/23,863) had left home for >4 hours, and 49.3% (11,757/23,863) had never left home during the 7-day Chinese New Year period; 79.7% (19,026/23,863) always used face-masks in public areas. The frequency of handwashing with soap was relatively low (6424/23,863, 26.9% for >5 times/day); 72.4% (17,282/23,863) had frequently undertaken ≥2 of these 3 measures. COVID-19–related cognitive factors (perceptions on modes of transmission, permanent bodily damage, efficacy of personal or governmental preventive measures, nonavailability of vaccines and treatments) were significantly associated with preventive measures. Associations with frequent face-mask wearing were stronger than those with frequent home staying. Conclusions University students had strong behavioral responses during the very early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak. Levels of personal prevention, especially frequent home staying and face-mask wearing, were high. Health promotion may modify cognitive factors. Some structural factors (eg, social distancing policy) might explain why the frequency of home staying was higher than that of handwashing. Other populations might have behaved similarly; however, such data were not available to us.

public, environmental & occupational health
Distribution of propafenone and its active metabolite, 5-hydroxypropafenone, in human tissues.

R. Latini,S. Marchi,E. Riva,A. Cavalli,M. Cazzaniga,A. Maggioni,A. Volpi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(87)90735-6

IF: 5.099

1987-03-01

American Heart Journal

Abstract:

Convulsions During Diabetic Ketosis: A Case Report

Contact behaviour before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: evidence from contact surveys, 2016 to 2017 and 2020 to 2023

Measuring the frequency and determinants of COVID-19 prevention behaviours: a cross-sectional assessment of large-scale programmes in seven countries, late 2020

Mass behaviour change amid COVID-19: How public health information and social norms explain the transformation

Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Changing Trends of Excess Self-Protective Behavior, and Association with Belief in Prevention Myths During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: A Panel Study

Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Associations With Perceived Behavioral Control, Attitudes, and Subjective Norm

Predicting health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study

Impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle-related behaviours- a cross-sectional audit of responses from nine hundred and ninety-five participants from India

Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission

The potential stickiness of pandemic-induced behavior changes in the United States

Changes in risk perception and protective behavior during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review

Psychosocial determinants of handwashing and physical distancing behaviour during the COVID‐19 pandemic in the Netherlands: A longitudinal analysis

The impact of behavioral interventions on respiratory viruses in a two-cohort study

Infection Control in the Home: a Qualitative Study Exploring Perceptions and Experiences of Adhering to Protective Behaviours in the Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Survey of public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding personal protection against COVID-19 in the post-pandemic era

Changes in COVID-19 Risk Perceptions: Methods of an Internet Survey Conducted in Six Countries.

Optische Kohärenztomographie in der Gynäkologie

Adoption of Preventive Measures During the Very Early Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: National Cross-sectional Survey Study

Distribution of propafenone and its active metabolite, 5-hydroxypropafenone, in human tissues.