Abstract:Background Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and/or myopic astigmatism still is one of primary surgeries.Femtosecond laser (FS)-LASIK offers several advantages over microkeratomes for flap creation including better safety,reproducibility,and predictability.However,the visual performance after FS-LASIK is of high clinical concern.Objective This study was to compare the visual performance between Intralase FS60 femtosecond laser flap and mechanical microkeratome Moria M2 flap in LASIK.Methods A prospective nonrandomized controlled study was performed.Two hundred and four myopic eyes of 102 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups according to patients’ opinion,with matched demography between the two groups.LASIK with FS60 femtosecond laser flap was performed on 100 eyes of 50 myopia and/or myopic astigmatism in the FS group,and Moria M2 flap LASIK was performed on 104 eyes of 52 patients in the microkeratomes group.Zernike coefficients and the root-mean-square (RMS) of higher order aberrations were measured by Wavescan wavefront aberrometer before and 3,6 and 12 months after surgery,and the contrast sensitivity (CS) in different spatial frequencies under the scotopia and scotopia + glare background was detected using Optec 6500 visual function instrument before and 3,6,12 months after surgery.This study protocol was approved by Ethic Committec of Beijing Tongren Hospital,and written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to surgery.Results The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) levels after surgery reached or was superior to the preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in 95.1％,94.2％ and 93.9％ patients in the FS group and in 94.2％,93.8％ and 93.2％ patients in the microkeratomes group 3,6,12 months after surgery,respectively.The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was (-6.37 ±2.06)D,(-0.26±0.45)D and (-0.45± 0.51)) in the FS group,(-6.25± 2.43) D,(-0.44± 0.64) D and (-0.35±0.59)D in the microkeratomes group before surgery and 3,12 months after surgery,respectively.There were no significant differences in the SE in various time points between the two groups (u =1.194,1.429;both at P＞ 0.05).The root means square high order (RMSh) and RMS3-6 in the FS group were significantly lower than those in the microkeratomes group 3,6 and 12 months after surgery (all at P＜0.05).Under the background of scotopia or scotopia+glare,the LogCS values under different spatial frequencies were significantly higher in the FS group than those in the microkeratomes group 3 and 6 months after surgery (all at P＜0.05).In 12 months after surgery,no significant difference was found in the LogCS under the 1.5 c/d in the background of scotopia between FS group and microkeratomes group (P＞0.05),and the LogCS values under the 12.0 c/d and 18.0 c/d in the background of scotopia or scotopia+glare in the FS group were better than those in the microkeratomes group (all at P＜0.05).Conclusions Femtosecond laser assistant LASIK has better visual performance and lower higher-order aberrations than microkeratomes assistant LASIK.

Clinical results of topography-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis using the anterior corneal astigmatism axis and manifest refractive astigmatism axis

A Comparative Study of the Effect of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery on Corneal Astigmatism in Post-LASIK Eyes and Virgin Eyes

Clinical outcomes after topography-guided FS-LASIK for myopia with nonastigmatic eyes

A Randomized Comparative Study of Topography-Guided Versus Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK for Correcting Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Topography-Guided FS-LASIK with PAE Algorithm and Sirius Tomography Data for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Comparison of Corneal Topography after Topography-Guided FS-LASIK and Wavefront-Optimized FS-LASIK

Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK

Comparative analysis of visual outcomes and ocular aberrations following wavefront optimized and topography-guided customized femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism: A contralateral eye study

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

Comparison of the effects of different side-cut angles on corneal biomechanical properties after femtosecond laser assisted-laser in situ keratomileusis

Corneal aberrations after femtosecond LASIK for myopia and myopia astigmatism with a wavefront optimized profile

Changes in the Higher Order Ocular Aberrations and Central Corneal Thickness After T-PRK and Fs-LASIK

Comparison of Corneal Optical Quality After SMILE, Wavefront-Optimized LASIK and Topography-Guided LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Refractive outcomes of high-magnitude astigmatism correction using femtosecond LASIK versus transepithelial PRK

Comparative Evaluation of Visual Outcomes and Corneal Asphericity after Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis with the Six-Dimension Amaris Excimer Laser System

Corneal aberrations and visual performance after flap creation of LASIK with a femtosecond laser and a mechanical microkeratome

Primary Topography-Guided LASIK: Refractive, Visual, and Subjective Quality of Vision Outcomes for Astigmatism ⩾2.00 Diopters

Comparison between the change in total corneal astigmatism and actual change in refractive astigmatism in transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FsLASIK)

Comparison of clinical outcomes of a corneal wavefront- and topography-guided platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis on virgin eyes: an expanded cohort study

Changes of corneal topography after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

Corneal Asphericity and Higher-Order Aberrations after FS-LASIK and Trans-PRK for Myopia