Noninvasive Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Infections
Ghaida Jabri,Farah Alotaibi,Amjad M Ahmed,Jesna Jose,Farhan Z Alenezi,Musharaf Sadat,Felwa Bin Humaid,Fahad Al-Hameed,Javed Memon,Kasim Al Khatib,Abdullah M Alsuayb,Mohammed AlObaidi,Mohammed Al Mutairi,Ahmad A Alanaizi,Fuad Alghamdi,Yaseen M Arabi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11286
2024-08-26
Respiratory Care
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared with invasive ventilation and mortality in subjects with severe acute respiratory infection.METHODS:This was a retrospective multi-center study of subjects with severe acute respiratory infection treated with ventilatory support between September 2012 and June 2018. We compared the 90-d mortality of subjects managed initially with NIV (NIV group) with those managed with invasive ventilation only (invasive ventilation group), adjusting by propensity score.RESULTS:Of 383 subjects, 189 (49%) were in the NIV group and 194 (51%) were in the invasive ventilation group. Of the subjects initially treated with NIV, 117 (62%) were eventually intubated. Crude 90-d mortality was lower in the NIV group versus the invasive ventilation group (42 [22.2%] vs 77 [39.7%]; P < .001). After propensity score adjustment, NIV was associated with lower 90-d mortality than invasive ventilation (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76; P < .001). The association of NIV with mortality compared with invasive ventilation was not different across the studied subgroups.CONCLUSIONS:In subjects with severe acute respiratory infection and acute respiratory failure, NIV was commonly used. NIV was associated with a lower 90-d mortality. The observed high failure rate suggests the need for further research to optimize patient selection and facilitate early recognition of NIV failure.
respiratory system,critical care medicine