Al2O3-MgO Supported Ni, Mo, and NiMo Mixed Phosphidic-Sulphidic Phase for Hydrotreating of Stearic and Oleic Acids Into Green Diesel

Esneyder Puello-Polo,Dana Arias,Edgar Márquez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.880051
2022-05-09
Abstract:The effect of the sulfur and metal-type content of MoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO, NiMoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO, and NiP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO phosphide on hydroprocessing (HDO, HDCx-HDCn, HCK, HYD, and HYG) of fatty acids was studied. The catalysts were characterized by XRF, XRD, textural properties, XPS, Raman, Py-TPD, and EDS elemental mapping. The chemical analyses by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), EDS elemental mapping, and CHNS-O elemental analysis showed stoichiometric values Al/Mg = 38-40, Mo:Ni:P ∼ 1, and S ≤ 4.5 wt % (this value means that the molar ratio Mo:S ∼ 1.0:1.6, i.e., MoS2); also EDS elemental mapping confirmed the presence of Mo, Ni, Al, O, P, Mg, and S with good distribution on Al2O3-MgO. The impregnation of metals leads to a decrease in the surface area and pore volume as follows NiMoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO < MoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO < NiP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO < Al2O3-MgO < Al2O3 (unimodal pore size distribution), propitiating a pseudo bimodal pore size distribution with Dp-BJH between ∼5-7 nm and 11.8-14.2 nm for the presence of MgO. XRD confirmed differences between metallic phosphates and phosphides, and XPS confirmed the presence at the surface of Moδ+(0 < δ+ < 2), Mo4+, Mo6+, Niδ+(0 < δ+ < 2), Ni2+, S2-, SO4 2-, Pδ+, and P5+ species. Raman revealed the presence of MoS2 only in MoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO and NiMoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO, while the NiMoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO catalyst had a more significant number of Brønsted and Lewis sites, although the increasing temperature decreased the Lewis sites. MoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO was more active at HDO showing the highest production rate for octadecane of 53 mol/(gcat·h), whereas NiP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO was more active at HDCx-HDCn [45 mol/(gcat·h)] and HCK [6 mol/(gcat·h)]; meanwhile, NiMoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO had a mix of HDO [47 mol/(gcat·h)] and HDCx-HDCn [41 mol/(gcat·h)]. This showed production towards octadecane, heptadecane, and light hydrocarbons, meaning that the fatty acids were deoxygenated through bifunctional sites for hydrogenation (HYD) and hydrogenolysis (HYG) as follows: MoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO (K1 = 0.08 and K2 = 0.03 L/mol) < NiMoP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO (K1 = 0.25 and K2 = 0.45 L/mol) < NiP-S/γ-Al2O3-MgO (K1 = 2.5 and K2 = 6.5 L/mol). For this reason, we considered that phosphide acts as a structural promoter with sulfur on its surface as a "mixed phosphidic-sulphidic species", allowing the largest generation of heptadecane and octadecane by the presence of BRIM sites for HYD and CUS sites for HYG.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?