Abstract:Statement of problem Three-dimensional (3D) printing of cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) removable partial dentures (RPDs)by selective laser melting (SLM) has been claimed to be less challenging than by conventional casting and provides significant improvements. However, the adaptation and fit of the SLM framework and the optimum build orientation are still unclear. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro and clinical study was to evaluate the effect of different build orientations on the adaptation of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by SLM technology in vitro and to compare the adaptation of the SLM and conventional RPD frameworks clinically. Material and methods A master model simulating a maxillary arch of Kennedy class III modification 1 was scanned and duplicated to create a virtual 3D cast and reference cast. Four groups (n=40) of Co-Cr RPD frameworks were fabricated. For the SLM groups, the Co-Cr framework was virtually designed and exported for SLM printing. The SLM printing was done in 3 different build orientations: 0-degree (n=10), 45-degree (n=10), and 90-degree (n=10) groups. Other Co-Cr frameworks were conventionally cast (n=10). All Co-Cr frameworks were scanned and virtually superimposed with the master model using a surface-matching software program. The gap under 9 selected points in the palatal major connectors was analyzed and calculated. A smaller gap indicates more surface adaptation and close contact between the palatal major connector and the master model. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunnett T3 tests (α=.05). Three patients with a partially dentate maxillary arch were enrolled in the clinical part based on inclusion criteria. Two RPD frameworks were provided for each patient (conventional casting and SLM printing). The adaptation of each framework was assessed by measuring the gap between the palatal major connector of the framework and the palate with light-body silicone. The differences in adaptation between the conventional and SLM frameworks were compared by using independent t tests (α=.05). Results The in vitro study identified significant differences in the adaptation of the palatal major connector among the 4 groups ( P <.001), except for conventional and 0-degree SLM printing ( P =.999). The conventional and 0-degree SLM frameworks exhibited the best adaptation, with the lowest gap underneath the palatal major connector of the RPD framework (0.01 ±0.02 mm and 0.01 ±0.01 mm, respectively). In the clinical part of the study, no significant difference was found between the adaptation of SLM and the conventional framework ( P =.430) Conclusions The adaptation of SLM printing can be maximized with less gap under the palatal major connector of the RPD framework when using the 0-degree build orientation. Co-Cr frameworks produced with SLM printing technology were comparable with conventionally produced frameworks; hence, SLM printed frameworks can be an alternative for clinical applications when optimum SLM parameters are applied.

Fit of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated from 3D printed patterns versus the conventional method: An in vitro comparison

Accuracy of metal 3D printed frameworks for removable partial dentures evaluated by digital superimposition

Evaluation of two printing techniques for maxillary removable partial denture frameworks

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Effect of finishing and polishing techniques on the fit accuracy and dimensions of conventional and CAD‐CAM removable partial denture frameworks

Accuracy of Mandibular Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated by 3D Printing and Conventional Techniques

Preliminary Clinical Application of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design and Rapid Prototyping Techniques.

Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser sintering

Adaptation of cobalt chromium frameworks fabricated by conventional versus selective laser melting techniques: An in vitro and clinical assessment

Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks: build orientations and support structure density parameters

Fit and Retention of Cobalt-Chromium Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated with Selective Laser Melting

Surface roughness and marginal adaptation of stereolithography versus digital light processing three-dimensional printed resins: An in-vitro study

Marginal fit of 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: Influence of pattern fabrication method and repeated porcelain firings

Fit comparison of interim crowns manufactured with open and proprietary 3D printing modes versus milling technology: An in vitro study

Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials

Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures

Adaptation of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting.

The Accuracy of a Novel 3D Digital Evaluation Method of Intraoral Fitness for Removable Partial Dentures.

Evaluating the Marginal and Internal Discrepancy of Nickel-Chrome Copings Made on Fixed Partial Denture Implants with Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques

Framework's marginal adaptation evaluation of fixed partial denture using conventional and digital impression techniques

Trial fitting of a removable partial denture framework made using computer-aided design and rapid prototyping techniques